Plan Review Details - Project E22120042
Plan Review Stops For Project E22120042
Review Stop ENG-A ENGINEERING FORMAL REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-24-2023 Cont ID  
Sent By lquinone Date 03-24-2023 Time 07:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lquinone Date 03-24-2023 Time 07:48 Sent To  
Notes
2023-03-24 07:51:02E22120042 - NORTHWOOD SQUARE INIT SUBMITTAL
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098
 [email protected] :
  
 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE
 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF
 CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
 2. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM
 AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER.
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND
 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED
 AREAS.
 4. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING
 PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT
 HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]
 5. PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND
 DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND
 SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, GREASE TRAPS, ETC. INCLUDING
 STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY
 SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND
 IRRIGATION METERS, BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS,
 AND OTHER DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH
 BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES
 SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS,
 CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND
 MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. GATE
 VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR SIDEWALK.
 ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE
 VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON
 PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. PLEASE
 SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT
 MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT,
 INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION &
 TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPES SIZES AND
 MATERIALS, LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 6. PLEASE CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE
 ANY ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM
 CITY RIGHT OF WAY.
 7. PLEASE SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS,
 INCLUDING THOSE PROPOSED TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY
 PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS.
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED
 LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION, AND
 EXISTING METER AND BACKFLOW (TO BE REMOVED?). BACKFLOWS
 SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF
 EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER METERS
 SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO PROPERTY
 LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED
 ABOVE-GROUND ONLY.
 9. PLEASE CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA
 AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE
 DESIGN ON ALL BACKFLOWS.
 10. ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL INCLUDE PIGGING, FLUSHING
 AND SAMPLE POINTS ON ANY WATER RUNS 60 FT. IN LENGTH OR
 GREATER.
 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND
 NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED.
 - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT:
 - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS
 THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OR SALE;
 - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE
 STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A
 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4).
 - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF
 CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION
 THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL
 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION.
 12. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER
 AND STORM LINES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS WITHIN ROW PER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL GN-2 SERIES.
 PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
 UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS,
 AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES WITH
 PIPE MATERIAL AND SIZE, LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 13. WHEN SUBMITTING APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE
 PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW
 DEVICES SHOWING SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING
 USC APPROVED LEAD-FREE DESIGN.
 14. PLEASE CLEARLY SHOW ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.
 15. PLEASE PROVIDE SANITARY ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE
 TIE-IN.
 16. IF SANITARY LINES ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW
 ADJACENT SANITARY LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES
 OF ADJACENT PARCELS.
 17. IF WATER LINES ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW
 ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES.
 18. IF TRENCHING IN IN CITY-MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS
 ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION
 TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH PER CITY OF
 WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-4.
 19. PLEASE PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE
 STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC.
 20. ERIC SCHNEIDER IN PLANNING ADVISES THAT BUILDING A
 ON THE CURRENT PLANS IN FOR ENGINEERING REVIEW DO NOT
 MATCH THE ???FINAL??? SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADVISE.
 21. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND
 INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER
 (E-XXXXXXXX).
  
 COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE
 SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 OR
 [email protected]:
  
 -ON DEMOLITION PLANS, FOR ANY METER THAT IS GOING TO BE
 REMOVED, THE METER BOX AND WATER SERVICE LINE SHOULD BE
 REMOVED ALSO.
 -CONFIRM WPB CRA APPROVES OF REMOVAL OF OLD CRA WATER
 SERVICES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA.
 -SHOW ALL FRANCHISE UTILITIES NEAR WORK AREAS.
 -PVC PIPE MATERIAL MAY NOT BE USED ON SMALL DIAMETER
 WATER SERVICES. CAN ONLY USE K COPPER OR POLY. SEE WPB
 STANDARD DETAILS AND APPROVED MATERIAL LIST.
 -SHEET C3.01: RELOCATE 8 INCH DDCA 50-60 FEET NORTH OF
 PROPOSED LOCATION.
 -PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR 8
 INCH DDCA ON SHEET C3.01 AS DIRECTED IN SD WS 5 NOTE 9.
 -VERIFY NO ADDED CHEMICALS IN PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM AS
 WELL AS NO AUXILIARY WATER SOURCES SUCH AS WELLS
 ATTACHED.
 - SHEET C3.01: ATTEMPT TO RELOCATE 2 INCH METER TO
 GRASS NEAR TAP. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHOULD BE ABLE TO BE
 INSTALLED NEAR IT ALONG THE BUILDING.
 -PVC CANNOT BE USED BETWEEN METER AND BACKFLOW
 ASSEMBLY.
 -ENSURE FDCS ARE ACCEPTABLE DISTANCE FROM FIRE
 HYDRANTS.
 -SHEET C3.01: 8 INCH FIRELINE CANNOT BE FED FROM 8 X 2
 TAP.
 -SHEET C3.02: FIX LABEL FOR 8 INCH FIRELINE. IT SAYS 2
 INCH PRIVATE WATER SERVICE.
 -PROVIDE FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR 8 INCH DDCA ON
 SHEET C3.02 AS DIRECTED IN SD WS 5 NOTE 9.
 -PROVIDE PROFILES FOR ALL PROPOSED FIRELINES, WATER
 SERVICES, AND FIRE HYDRANTS LINES.
 -SHEET C3.02: CALLOUT CROSSING OF FIRE HYDRANT PIPE AND
 STORM PIPE.
 -ADD RP TO DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY LABELS.
 -SHEET C3.03: PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED FLOW
 CALCULATIONS FOR 6 INCH WATER METER AS DIRECTED IN SD
 WS 3 NOTE 2.
 -ADD MARKUP NOTE TO SD WS1 THAT DUAL CHECK IS NOT USED
 WHEN THERE IS A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
 -SHEET C3.03: CALLOUT MINIMUM 18 INCHES BETWEEN TAPS.
 -PROVIDE FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR 8 INCH DDCA ON
 SHEET C3.03 AS DIRECTED IN SD WS 5 NOTE 9.
 -ON DEMO PLAN, SHOW EXISTING SEWER LATERAL FOR PARCEL
 12 BUILDING BETWEEN 23RD ST. AND NORTHWOOD RD. ALSO
 SHOW ANY EXISTING SEWER LATERALS ATTACHED TO THE
 SANITARY MAIN PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED ON 23RD ST.
 -SHOW ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICES COMING OFF WATER MAIN
 TO BE REMOVED ON 23RD ST. ON DEMO PLAN AS WELL AS ON
 UTILITY PLAN. THERE MAY BE SOME FOR NEIGHBORING
 PROPERTIES.
 -SHOW AND LABEL SAMPLE POINTS IF ANY ARE NEEDED OR
 REQUIRED.
 -FLOW TESTS ARE REQUIRED ON FIRE HYDRANTS AFTER
 INSTALLATION. CONSIDER ADDED NOTE TO PLAN SET.
 -IS A HEALTH PERMIT NEEDED OR REQUIRED?
 -ADD WPB STANDARD DETAIL GS5 TO PLAN SET.
 -PROVIDE FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR 8 INCH DDCA ON
 SHEET C3.04 AS DIRECTED IN SD WS 5 NOTE 9.
 -C3.04: TRANSFORMER SLIGHTLY ENCROACHES INTO SIDEWALK.
 CAN IT BE ADJUSTED OUT OF SIDEWALK?
 -SHEET C3.04: CANNOT USE PVC FOR 4 INCH WATER MAIN.
 WOULD HAVE TO BE DIP. ALSO CHECK WITH RICKY ELIZONDO IF
 SHOULD BE 4 INCH OR UPSIZED LARGER. LASTLY, CLEARLY
 SHOW AND LABEL PIPE CONTINUATION WEST OF THE 77 LF OF
 WM.
 -DID NOT SEE METERED WATER SERVICE FOR BUILDING C
 NORTH. IS ONE MISSING?
  
 COMMENTS FROM TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENG.,
 ENGINEERING SERVICES, [email protected] 561-494-1120:
  
 1. ON ALL PLAN SHEETS, SHOW AND LABEL PROPOSED RIGHT OF
 WAY/PROPERTY LINES AT THE LIMITS OF RIGHT-OF-WAYS TO BE
 ABANDONED.
  
 2. REVISE EXISTING DRAINAGE LAYOUT AT THE SOUTHEAST
 CORNER OF 24TH STREET AND BROADWAY AVE. THE P-6 INLET
 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET IS CONNECTED TO A
 MANHOLE STRUCTURE IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA BEHIND THE
 INLET. THE MANHOLE IS CONNECTED TO THE MANHOLE IN THE
 NORTHBOUND LANE OF BROADWAY AVE. REMOVE THE PIPE SHOWN
 BETWEEN THE WEST MANHOLE AND THE INLET. SHOW EXISTING
 PIPING AND CURB INLET (STRUCTURE #S-2A IN THE SNIPPET
 BELOW) LOCATED AT THE WEST END OF THE ON-STREET PARKING
 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH ST. KHA WAS THE EOR FOR THE
 24TH ST AND 25TH ST PROJECT IN 2008. FOR DRAWINGS,
 PLEASE SEE REVIEW COMMENTS FROM EMAIL 3/24/23.
  
  
  
  
 3. REVIEW EXISTING DRAINAGE LAYOUT ON NORTHWOOD ROAD
 EAST OF BROADWAY AVE. FOR DRAWINGS, PLEASE SEE REVIEW
 COMMENTS FROM EMAIL 3/24/23.
  
  
 4. SHEET C0.01
 A. PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES #1
 - CHANGE OR PROVIDE SIMILAR NOTE FOR CITY???S
 RIGHT-OF-WAY
  
 5. SHEETS C1.03, C1.04
 A. CALLOUT/HATCH THE REMOVAL OF THE STORM PIPES AND
 STRUCTURES ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF NORTHWOOD
 ROAD.
  
 6. SHEET C1.53
 A. SHOW EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
 23RD ST. ADJUST CURB RAMP.
 B. CAN THE TWO PARKING SPACES ON EACH SIDE OF PINEWOOD
 AVE BE SHIFTED NORTH SO THAT THE STOP SIGN CAN BE
 INSTALLED CLOSER TO THE ROAD?
 C. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF CURBING AT THE ENDS OF THE
 TWO-PARKING SPACE AREA ON THE EAST SIDE OF PINEWOOD
 AVE.
 D. CONFIRM STOP SIGN IS NEEDED FOR WESTBOUND 23RD ST AT
 THE START OF THE RAILROAD PAVEMENT MARKING.
  
 7. SHEET C1.54
 A. ADD LEFT ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING AND LEFT TURN ONLY
 SIGN TO THE STOP SIGN FOR EAST BOUND TRAFFIC ON 23RD
 ST. AT BROADWAY AVE. WILL ADVANCED WARNING SIGN BE
 NEEDED?
 B. CONSIDER MOVING THE WESTBOUND STOP BAR CLOSER TO THE
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK AND EXTENDING THE LANDSCAPE
 BULBOUT TO THE WEST.
 C. ADD STOP SIGN FOR WESTBOUND 23RD STREET TRAFFIC AT
 BROADWAY AVE.
 D. CALLOUT THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS BETWEEN NORTHBOUND AND
 SOUTHBOUND TRAVEL LANES OF BROADWAY AVE. NORTH OF
 NORTHWOOD ROAD.
  
 8. CALLOUT STRIPING FOR PARKING SPACES.
  
 9. PAVING ANG DRAINAGE PLANS
  
 A. INDICATE DIRECTION OF INVERT ELEVATIONS AT DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURES INSTEAD OF IN AND OUT CALLOUTS. IT WILL MAKE
 LABELING THE AS-BUILT ELEVATIONS EASIER. THE IN AND OUT
 DIRECTIONS ARE NOT DEFINED.
  
 10. SHEET C2.01
 A. ADD SECTIONS I-I AND J-J TO THE SHEET.
  
 11. SHEET C2.02
 A. NUMBER THE DRAINAGE MANHOLE EAST OF STRUCTURE EX. 7.
 THE RIM ELEVATION FOR THE STRUCTURE WILL NEED TO BE
 ADJUSTED BECAUSE THE GRADING PLAN SHOW ELEVATION 15.48
 EIGHT FEET FROM THE STRUCTURE.
 B. STRUCTURE ST-15A IS SHOWN AS A MANHOLE. THE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE DETAIL ON SHEET C2.12 IS DRAWN WITH A GRATE
 INSTEAD OF MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER.
  
 12. SHEET C2.03
 A. REVIEW RIM ELEVATION OF 15.90 FOR STRUCTURE EX. 5.
 IT IS HIGHER THAN THE PROPOSED EP GRADE OF 15.63 AT THE
 CORNER CURB RAMP.
  
 13. SHEET C2.04
 A. SECTION G-G IS SHOWNSOUTH OF THE ALLEY. THE SECTION
 DETAIL ON SHEET C2.09 CALLS OUT THE ALLEY AND DOES NOT
 SHOW THE TYPE D-CURB ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SECTION.
 B. THE PIPE BETWEEN STRUCTURES ST-33 AND ST-27 IS SHOWN
 WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCH BUT THE TRENCH LENGTH IS NOT
 CALLED OUT.
  
 14. SHEET C2.05
 A. STEEP LONGITUDINAL SLOPE (UP TO 3.2%) NORTH OF
 STRUCTURES ST-1 AND ST-3. CAN THESE STRUCTURES BE
 LOWERED AND THE PARKING SPACE CROSS SLOPE INCREASED IN
 ORDER TO FLATTEN THE EP SLOPE NORTH OF THE STRUCTURES?
  
 15. SHEET C2.06
 A. CONFIRM SPOT GRADE OF 15.83 SOUTH OF STRUCTURE EX.2.
 THERE IS A SPOT GRADE OF 16.64 31 FEET TO THE WEST AND
 A SPOT GRADE OF 16.80 11 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST.
 B. CURB LINE MISSING ALONG THE BACK OF THE ON-STREET
 PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF BROADWAY AVE.
 C. CONFIRM THE (EP?) SPOT GRADE OF 15.57 EAST OF
 STRUCTURE ST-38 (WITH RIM ELEVATION 15.65). THE TRAVEL
 LANE IS SLOPED AWAY FROM THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE.
 D. CONFIRM PROPOSED RIM ELEVATION OF 14.94 FOR
 STRUCTURE EX. 3. THE PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPE WILL EXCEED
 5% DOWN TO THE SPOT GRADE OF 14.35 AT THE EP.
  
 16. SHEET C2.08
 A. REVIEW DROP CURB LONGITUDINAL SLOPES ARE MINIMUM
 0.15%, 0.30% PREFERRED MINIMUM.
  
 17. SHEET C2.09
 A. SECTION D-D SHOWS DROP CURB LOWER THAN THE EXISTING
 GRADE. THE GRADING PLAN SHOWS THE PROPOSED DROP CURB
 ABOUT 1 FOOT HIGHER THAN EXISTING GRADES. ALTHOUGH THE
 SECTION IS NOTED AS NTS, THESE ARE ELEVATION GRID LINES
 PROVIDED AND THE DROP CURB APPEARS TO BE DRAWN AT
 ELEVATION 14.6 AND THE TOP OF D-CURB AT ELEVATION 15.0.
 THE GRADING PLAN SHOWS APPROX. ELEVATIONS OF 15.65 AND
 16.35 RESPECTIVELY. THE EXISTING GRADE AT THE DROP CURB
 LOCATION IS APPROXIMATELY 14.65.
 B. HOW WILL BROADWAY AVE BE GRADED/SLOPED?
 C. THE GRADING PLAN SHOWS PROPOSED SPOT GRADES AT THE
 PROPOSED DROP CURBS ABOUT 1 FOOT HIGHER THAN EXISTING
 GRADES AT THE SECTION E-E LOCATION.
 D. EXTEND THE WEST SIDE OF SECTION F-F TO 5 FEET BEYOND
 THE HARDSCAPE AREA.
 E. SECTION H-H CALLS OUT MAX. 2% SLOPE FOR PARKING ON
 RIGHT SIDE OF SECTION. THE GRADING PLAN MAY CREATE
 SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2%.
  
 18. SHEET C2.11
 A. SPECIFY SUPERPAVE INSTEAD OF S-III ASPHALT MIXTURE.
  
 19. SHEET C2.12
 A. CONTROL STRUCTURE ST-34 DETAIL
 I. OUTFLOW PIPE LABELED AS 18???. SHEET C2.04 CALLS OUT
 15??? RCP.
 B. WEIR PLATE IS DIMENSIONED AS 4 FEET WIDE BUT THE
 STRUCTURES ARE 4??? 10??? WIDE.
 C. WEIR PLATE IS SHOWN WITH A 2-FT DIAMETER HOLE AT
 INVERT ELEVATION 14.00 FT NAVD, PUTTING THE TOP OF THE
 PLATE ABOVE ELEVATION 16.0 FT NAVD. ADVISE HOW THIS
 WEIR PLATE WILL FIT IN STRUCTURES ST-28 (GRATE ELEV. =
 15.41 FT NAVD) AND ST-37 (GRATE ELEV. = 15.97 FT NAVD).
  
 20. SHEET C3.07
 A. CONFLICT #45 INFORMATION NOT LISTED. IT IS SHOWN ON
 SHEET C3.01.
  
 21. SHEET C2.10
 A. PROVIDE TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS AND WIDTH ON THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL ST-8.
  
 22. PROVIDE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW.
  
  
 COMMENTS FROM RICKY ELIZONDO, PUB. UTILITIES PLANS
 EXAMINER, [email protected] , 561-494-1101:
  
 SHEET C1.01
 -DENOTE WHETHER EXISTING MANHOLE IS TO REMAIN ON
 INTERSECTION OF 25TH STREET AND PINEWOOD.
 -SHOW LATERALS/SERVICE LINES BEING REMOVED AS PART OF
 DEMOLITION
 -BOLDED POTION OF WATER MAIN NOT CROSSED OFF ON 25TH
 STREET IS LABELED AS EXISTING 8??? DIP, ACTUALLY
 6???CICL
  
 SHEET C1.02
 -BOLDED PORTION OF WATER MAIN ON 25TH STREET SHOULD BE
 CROSSED OFF
 -CONFIGURATION OF EXISTING WATER MAIN SHOWN ON 24TH
 STREET DOES NOT MATCH RECORDS. (16??? IS CONNECTED VIA
 VALVE TO SOUTH, NOT ON THE CROSS)
  
 SHEET C1.04
 -SPECIFY EXTENTS WATER MAIN REMOVAL IN THE ALLEY
 -IS THE SEWER MAIN REMOVAL ON 23RD STREET UP TO THE
 MANHOLE? PLEASE SPECIFY
 -SHOW SERVICE LINES AND LATERALS BEING REMOVED
 (SERVICES APPEAR TO BE MISSING ON 23RD STREET)
  
 SHEET C3.01
 -DEFINE MEANS OF CONNECTION FOR PROPOSED FORCE MAIN TO
 EXISTING SYSTEM
 -FORCE MAIN WAS AGREED TO BE UPSIZED TO 20??? PER PRIOR
 CONVERSATION
 -LOOK TO CITY DETAIL P-6 FOR VALVE CONFIGURATIONS
 NEEDED FOR CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM IN ORDER
 TO CONDUCT TESTING
 -DETAIL FOR PROPOSED FIRE LINE TAPPING OFF OF 25TH
 STREET IS LABELED INCORRECTLY
 -DEFINE PRIVATE SEWER SYSTEM (AND DENOTE ALL
 APPURTENANCES TO IT AS PRIVATE AS WELL)
 -DENOTE DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR 2??? LINE AS
 ???RPPA (USC APPROVED)
 -A ???DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY??? CALL OUT IS
 POINTING TO FIRE LINE
  
 SHEET C3.02
 -FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION WILL REQUIRE AN ANCHOR TEE
 (25TH STREET)
 -A SECOND GATE VALVE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED
 HYDRANT
 -MORE DESCRIPTION NEEDED FOR FIRE LINE CONNECTION TO
 MAIN RUNNING EAST/WEST ON 25TH STREET
 -MANHOLE SS-5???S SOUTHERN INVERT WILL REQUIRE A DROP.
 ADD THIS NOTE TO PLANS AND DROP DETAIL FROM CITY
 STANDARDS TO PLANS.
 -CAP/PLUG FOR WATER MAIN RUNNING EAST/WEST ON
 PASEO/24TH NOT CALLED OUT.
 -PLEASE ADD A CLEANOUT ALONG PROPERTY LINE FOR RUN OF
 SEWER ON PASEO/24TH STREET
 -PER FDOH, PLEASE ADD NOTES ON ALL SHEETS VTO REFLECT
 THE FOLLOWING:
 1. CONTRACTOR WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH AWWA C651
 4.6.2 SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR
 CONNECTIONS GREATER THAN 18FT
 2. DEADENDS GREATER THAN 20FT WILL REQUIRE A SAMPLE
 POINT
 -EXISITING GATE VALVES ARE NOT REFLECTED ON CROSS AT
 INTERSECTION OF 25TH STREET AND BROADWAY
  
 SHEET C3.03
 -LABEL SEWER AS PRIVATE AS NECESSARY
 -ELABORATE ON MEANS OF CONNECTION BETWEEN EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED FORCE MAIN.
 -SEE DETAIL P-6 FOR MEANS OF CONNECTION BETWEEN
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED WATER SYSTEMS FOR TESTING
  
 SHEET C3.04
 -PROPOSED 4??? LINE CANNOT BE PVC
 -LABEL DOMESTIC BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES AS RPPA (USC
 APPROVED)
 -PROPOSED TEE ON BROADWAY AND PASEO/24TH NOT LABELED
 -SHOW MORE CLARITY WITH SEWER RUN ON 23RD STREET.
 EXISTING LINE WAS SHOWN FOR REMOVAL ON THE DEMOLITION
 PLAN
  
 SHEET C3.05
 -23RD STREET PROFILE NEEDS TO BE SHOW UP TO THE GATE
 VALVE
 -PROPOSED 8??? TAP IS NOT CALLED OUT
 -PROPOSED 2??? TAP NOT SHOWN
 -BROADWAY PROFILE DOES NOT HAVE VERTICAL BENDS CALLED
 OUT. DO SO FOR BOTH PLANS AND PROFILE
 -CALL OUT BOTH ENDS OF PROFILE AS 24???X24??? TEE
 -PROVIDE SCALE FOR PROFILES
 -NEED A PROFILE VIEW FOR 25TH STREET AND ALLEY WATER
 MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
 -PROFILE VIEW FOR FORCE MAIN IS NEEDED
  
 SHEET C3.06
 -PIPE MISSING BETWEEN MANHOLES ON PINEWOOD AVENUE SEWER
 PROFILE
 -SHOW PROPERTY LINE ON 24TH STREET/PASEO PROFILE VIEW
 -CALL OUT MANHOLE DROP FOR MANHOLE SS-5 ON BROADWAY
 SEWER PROFILE
 -PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM MAY NEED TO BE REASSESSED AS IT
 APPEARS TOO LOW TO CONNECT TO EXISTING MASTER SYSTEM
 PROPERLY
  
 SHEET C3.07
 -DOUBLE CHECK THE LISTED PIPES FOR EACH OF THE
 UTILITIES CROSSINGS. (FOR EXAMPLE, CROSSING 12
 MISLABELS A 6??? SEWER LATERAL AS A 14??? SEWER PIPE)
  
 SHEET C3.11
 -DETAIL P-3 NEEDS TO BE ADDED (JUMPER ASSEMBLY FOR
 TESTING)
  
 SHEET C3.12
 -ADD DETAIL GS-4 FOR DROP MANHOLE
 -ADD DETAIL GS-5 FOR CONSTRUCTION GUIDANCE FOR LATERAL
 INSTALLATION
  
  
  
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR
 CONCERNS, THANKS.
 RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT (561) 494-1098 [email protected]
  

Review Stop ENG-D ENGINEERING DEFICIENCY REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop ENG-E ENGINEERING ENVR. MIT. REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop ENG-F ENGINEERING FINAL DRAWING REV
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop ENG-M ENGINEERING MODIFICATION REV
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop ENG-T ENGINEERING TRAFFIC STUDY REV
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved