| 2016-06-13 14:32:27 | PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS IN WRITING: |
| | |
| | COMMENTS ON THE URBAN YOUTH IMPACT SITE IMPROVEMENTS |
| | PROJECT SUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | THE APPLICATION PACKAGE IS MISSING THE FOLLOWING: |
| | 1- PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST |
| | 2- INFRASTRUCTURE REPORTS PARTS 1 AND 2 |
| | 3- COMPLETED CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES |
| | 4- SITE PLAN APPROVED DRAWINGS (PLANNING DEPT.) |
| | 5- OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION (IF ANY) SUCH AS |
| | REGULATORY PERMIT APPROVALS, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, |
| | LEGAL AGREEMENTS IMPACTING THE PROJECT, OR ANY OTHER |
| | RELEVANT DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS ON THE PLANS (ENGINEERING DRAWINGS): |
| | 1- SHEET 1: LOCATION MAP IS SHOWING 45TH STREET IN TWO |
| | DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. PLEASE CHECK/REVISE. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET 2: |
| | A. R/W LINES SHOULD BE CLEARLY LABELED ON THE PLAN AND |
| | INCLUDED IN THE LEGEND ALSO. |
| | B. OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | LEGEND, FOR EXAMPLE THE WALKWAYS, THE HATCHING SHOWN ON |
| | THE NORTHERN EXISTING BUILDINGS, ETC. |
| | C. NOTE #6 IS REFERRING TO A SITE PLAN PREPARED BY |
| | ANOTHER CONSULTANT BUT IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE |
| | DRAWINGS. |
| | D. SURFACE FLOW ARROW IS SHOWN IN THE LEGEND BUT NOT ON |
| | THE PLAN. FOR EXAMPLE, WITH THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE |
| | SYSTEM DOES THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE FROM THE NORTHERN |
| | PARKING LOT STILL FLOWS DIRECTLY TO AUSTRALIAN AVE OR |
| | IS IT PICKED UP IN THE PVC PIPES AND ROUTED TO THE |
| | RETENTION AREA? SIMILARLY, DOES THE RE-WORKED ASPHALT |
| | PARKING AREA SHEET FLOW TO THE SOUTHERN RETENTION AREA? |
| | E. INVERT/RIM ELEVATIONS OF PIPES/STRUCTURES UPSTREAM |
| | OF THE BUBBLE-UP YD'S SHOULD ALSO BE INDICATED. |
| | F. YD-3 IS SHOWN IN TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS, THE |
| | NUMBERING MAY NEED TO BE REVISED. |
| | G. FOR CONFLICT POINT #2, PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK THE |
| | INVERT OF THE 8" RWL PIPE TO CONFIRM SUFFICIENT |
| | CLEARANCE FROM THE EXISTING WTR LINE. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET 3: |
| | A. OTHER ELEMENTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE LEGEND; FOR |
| | EXAMPLE THE WALKWAY, THE HATCHING SHOWN ON THE NORTHERN |
| | EXISTING BUILDINGS, ETC. |
| | B. WHAT DO THE NUMBERS SHOWN ON SOME OF THE PARKING |
| | SPACES DESIGNATE? FOR EXAMPLE NUMBERS 3, 4, 6, 8, ETC. |
| | WHAT DO THEY DESIGNATE? |
| | |
| | 4- SHEET 5: |
| | A. IT IS ADVISABLE TO INCLUDE A LEGEND THAT SHOWS THE |
| | RELEVANT ELEMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION AND EROSION CONTROL, |
| | SUCH AS R/W LINES, PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED, SILT FENCE, |
| | ETC. |
| | B. PLEASE CHECK IF THE SILT FENCE SHOULD BE EXTENDED |
| | FURTHER TO THE SOUTH AND WEST THAN THE LIMITS SHOWN ON |
| | THE PLAN. |
| | C. LOCATIONS OF DRAINAGE INLETS (IF ANY) IN WHICH INLET |
| | PROTECTION WILL BE PROVIDED SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | STORM WATER CALCULATIONS: |
| | 1- THE SOIL STORAGE TABLE SHOWN IN THE CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOULD ALSO SHOW THE COLUMN FOR THE 25% COMPACTED SOIL |
| | WHICH CONTAINS THE 8.18" USED IN THE CALCULATIONS. THE |
| | CURRENT SHOWN TABLE DOES NOT CONTAIN THE 8.18" SOIL |
| | STORAGE AMOUNT. |
| | 2- THE WET SEASON WATER TABLE (WSWT) ELEVATION MAY ALSO |
| | NEED TO BE DETERMINED AND COMPARED TO THE CONTROL |
| | ELEVATION. THE SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS USE THE CONTROL |
| | ELEVATION AS THE BASIS FOR CALCULATING THE SOIL |
| | STORAGE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | BASSAM SAMARA, P.E |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 |
| | PHONE: (561) 494-1040 |
| | FAX: (561) 494-1116 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING |
| | |
