| 2009-11-13 06:36:19 | |
| | NOV 12, 2009 KELLY FREEMAN REVIEWED - NO COMMENTS |
| | |
| | NOV. 13, 2009 ESD MANNY GONZALEZ, STILL REVIEWING |
| | |
| | NOV. 23, 2009 MJG / JEFF RENAULT |
| | MJG |
| | 1) RIGHT TURN LANE SIGN AND TRAFFIC PATTERN TO BE |
| | APPLIED WITH PBC TRAFFIC AS BELVEDERE IS PBC ROADWAY |
| | 2) IMPROVEMENTS IN ROW AND OFF-SITE DESIGN PLAN NEEDED |
| | FOR REVIEW. |
| | 3) PROVIDE CONDUITS FOR IRRIGATION IN THE ROW FROM SITE |
| | TO PLANTERS 3" MIN. SDR-26 |
| | 4) HC RAMP COMING FROM SIDEWALK WILL REQUIRE A LANDING |
| | AREA. |
| | 5) DRIVEWAY MUST BE PER FDOT INDEX 515 PAGE 2 OF 6 TO |
| | ACHIEVE THE 2% CROSS-SLOPE UNTO BELVEDERE. |
| | 6) DUMPSTER MUST BE 12'-6" MIN. DEPTH. |
| | 7) SITE NEXT TO TACO BELL REVIEW IS SUBJECT TO THE TACO |
| | BELL LEASE PROPERTY. IMPROVEMENT TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES |
| | REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS. |
| | 8) ENG COST ESTIMATE IS ACCURATE HOWEVER IF DRAINAGE |
| | ELEMENTS CHANGE THEN IT MUST BE REVISED. SUBMIT CHECK |
| | FOR 5.5% OF THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS DOCUMENT. |
| | |
| | JR |
| | 1) SHT C-2 , CB - 4 , PLAN SHOWS GRATE ELEV OF 17.2 AND |
| | 17.5 ? |
| | 2) SHT C-2 , DRAINAGE SCHEDULE , CALL FOR 1 PRB FOR |
| | CB-1 ; |
| | 2 PRB FOR CB-2 ; 2 PRB FOR CB-3 AND 1 PRB FOR CB-4 |
| | 3) SHT C-2 , DRAINAGE SCHEDULE , WHY ARE EXFILTRATION |
| | PIPE |
| | INVERTS SO LOW (11.5) ? WILL 12.5 WORK ? |
| | 4) SHT C-6 , EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL - WHY IS EXFIL |
| | TRENCH SO DEEP ? CONSIDER A TRENCH THAT IS 4' DEEP X 5' |
| | WIDE WITH |
| | PERFORATED PIPE INVERT = |
| | 12.5 , 12" OF WASHED ROCK ABOVE THE PIPE AND THE REST |
| | OF THE ROCK BELOW. |
| | - INSTALL FABRIC ON ALL SIDES OF TRENCH WITH 2' OVERLAP |
| | ON TOP. |
| | - FOR EACH CB ADD A 12" DIA WEEP HOLE . UNDER WEEP HOLE |
| | INSTALL HARDWARE |
| | CLOTH (SS) ON 2'X2'X6" OF |
| | WASHED ROCK WRAPED ALL AROUND WITH FABRIC |
| | 5) IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO RETAIN THE 100 YR - 3 DAY |
| | STORM |
| | RUNOFF ON SITE. WHAT THE CITY IS LOOKING FOR ARE CALCS |
| | FOR WATER QUALITY ( |
| | GREATER OF 1" OVER |
| | ENTIRE SITE OR 2.5 X % IMPERVIOUS) AND CALCS SHOWING |
| | THAT THE POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF DOES NOT EXCEED THE |
| | PRE DEVELOPMENT |
| | RUNOFF. |
| | |
| | SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS , PLEASE CONTACT ME. |
| | |
| | |
| | |