| Date |
Text |
| 2001-02-20 00:00:00 | PERMIT # 99110196 |
| | 6107 S. DIXIE HWY. |
| | CINQUE PROPERTIES |
| | |
| | 1)- THE SURVEY & TAX RECORDS DECLARE |
| | THESE TO BE SEPERATE LOTS. A UNITY OF |
| | TITLE NEEDS TO BE RECORDED TO BUILD THE |
| | PROPOSED STRUCTURE ON THESE LOTS. THE |
| | CONTACT PERSON TO SEE WOULD BE |
| | ANGELLA JONES (SENIOR PLANNER) IN THE |
| | ZONING DEPARTMENT.659-8031. |
| | 2)- THE NEW SURVEY DOESN'T DEPICT THE |
| | NEW BUILDING LOCATION. THE SITE PLAN |
| | DOESN'T GIVE THE DIMENSION FROM THE REAR |
| | OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | THIS INFORMATION IS CRITICAL IN DETER- |
| | MINING THE RATING ON THE EXTERIOR WALLS |
| | AS WELL AS THE % OF OPENINGS ALLOWED. |
| | STANDARD BUILDING CODE TABLE 600 |
| | (HORIZONTAL SEPERATION) REQUIRES 0-3' |
| | 3 HR. WALLS/ 0 OPENINGS. 3' TO 10' ALLOW |
| | FOR A 2 HR. WALL & 10 % OPENINGS. SEE |
| | NOTE "B" PARAPETS 704.5 THIS IS THE WALL |
| | DEPICTED WITH "NO PARAPET SO THE ROOF |
| | DRAINAGE WAS TO CASCADE OVER THIS WALL. |
| | ROOF DRAINAGE WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED |
| | WITH SCUPPERS AND OVERFLOWS. |
| | 3)- TABLE 600 THE SOUTHELEVATION OF |
| | THE PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION VS THE |
| | EXISTING BUILDING 1,421 SQ. FT. AN |
| | ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE NEEDS TO BE ESTAB- |
| | LISHED BETWEEN THE 2 STRUCTURES. THEN WE |
| | LOOK AT WHAT WALL RATINGS AND % OF OPEN- |
| | INGS, AND OPENING PROTECTIVES WOULD MEET |
| | THE TABLE 600 REQUIRMENTS. ATTACHED IS A |
| | EXAMPLE FROM THE COMMENTARIES SHOWING A |
| | BUILDING 45% TO THE PROPERTY LINE, THIS |
| | SHOULD HELP IN DETERMINING WALL RATINGS |
| | AND OPENING PROTECTIVES.REMEMBER TABLE |
| | 600 NOTE "B" ON PARAPETS, 3'-0" ABOVE |
| | THE ROOF LINE. |
| | 4)_ SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT: A COPY |
| | OF THE COUNTYWIDE AMENDMENTS IS ATTACHED |
| | THE STUCTURAL PLANS FOUNDATION NOTES |
| | DESCRIBE A TESTING REPORT THAT THEIR |
| | DESIGN WAS BASED ON, (DUNKLEBERGER ENG & |
| | TESTING, DATED NOV.30, 2000). THIS IS |
| | THE REPORT CONTAINING THE INFORMATION |
| | THAT THE CITY HAS BEEN ASKING FOR. |
| | 5)- TRAVEL DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE |
| | MOST REMOTE POINT TO THE EXIT, INCLUDING |
| | THE 2ND FLOOR STORAGE. THE USAGE OR |
| | OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING WILL BE RETAIL |
| | OR BY OCCUPANCY: MERCANTILE. THE MAXIMUM |
| | DISTANCE THAT APERSON COULD TRAVEL |
| | WITH THE SINGLE EXIT ON THE SECOND FLOOR |
| | IS 50'-0". THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE PRO- |
| | TECTION OF THE EXIT STAIRWAY.SBC1006.1.1 |
| | EXIT STAIRWAYS BETWEEN FLOORS SHALL BE |
| | ENCLOSED IN OR SEPERATED BY FIRE RESIS- |
| | TANT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | 705.2 & TABLE 705.1.2. SBC 705.2.1.1 |
| | PROTECTION OF FLOOR OPENINGS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PRO- |
| | VISIONS TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF FIRE |
| | FROM STORY TO STORY. THE EXIT SHALL BE |
| | RATED TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. |
| | THE THIRD ISSUE IS THE OCCUPANCY SEPERA- |
| | TION BETWEEN THE FIRST FLOOR (MERCAN- |
| | TILE- 1 HR) AND THE (STORAGE OCCUPANCY |
| | 2 HR) ON THE SECOND FLOOR. |
| | 6)- FIRE DISTRICT: 102.2.5 IN BUILDINGS |
| | 2 STORIES OR MORE IN HEIGTH ALL WALLS, |
| | FLOORS, ROOFS AND THEIR SUPPORTING |
| | STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SHALL PROVIDE NOT |
| | LESS THAN 1 HR. FIRE RESISTANCE. SHOW |
| | UL LISTINGS FOR THESE COMPONENTS. |
| | 7)- SECOND FLOOR LIVE LOAD NOTED ON |
| | A-5.0 AS "60 LBS. LIVE".SBC TABLE 1604.1 |
| | FOR THE LIVE LOADS FOR THE SECOND FLOOR |
| | ARE 125 LBS FOR LIGHT STORAGE.PLEASE |
| | HAVE THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER REVISIT HIS |
| | CALCULATIONS FORTHIS ADDITIONAL LOADING. |
| | 8)- GUARDRAIL DETAILS: A5.1 THE STAIR |
| | HANDRAIL/ GUARDRAIL DETAIL NEEDS TO |
| | COMPLY WITH SBC 1015.3, A 4" SPHERE TO N |
| | OT BE ABLE TO PASS THROUGH THE UPRIGHTS. |
| | 9)- FL ACCESSIBILITY CODE 4.9.4.1 A CON- |
| | TINIOUS HANDRAIL ON BOTH SIDES OF THE |
| | STAIRS, EXTEND 12" BEYOND THE TOP RISER |
| | & 12" PLUS THE WIDTH OF ONE TREAD BEYOND |
| | THE BOTTOM RISER. |
| | 10)- VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY: NOTE: |
| | WHENEVER THE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY ON THE |
| | SECOND FLOOR (STORAGE) IS CHANGED TO A |
| | HABITABLE OCCUPANCY,VERTICAL ACCESSIBIL- |
| | ITY WILL BE REQUIRED. THERE IS NO 20% |
| | DISPROPORTIONATE COST INVOLED.THIS NOTE |
| | WILL APEAR ON THE PLANS. |
| | 11)- SBC 1606.2.6.2 COMPONENENTS & CLAD- |
| | DING, THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON THE |
| | FRONT DOOR IS FOR SMALL MISSLE IMPACT |
| | TESTING ONLY. A COPY OF THE CITY'S |
| | POLICY FOR GLAZED OPENINGS IS INCLUDED |
| | FOR TESTING REPORTS THAT HAVE NOT |
| | RECEIVED SBCCI APPROVAL OR DADE COUNTY |
| | APPROVAL, THE REPORT HAS TO BE SITE |
| | SPECIFIC AND THE SEALED BY THE MANUFAC- |
| | TURES ENGINEER AS WELL AS THE ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT. THE CITY WILL |
| | ALSO REQUIRE SEPERATE REPORTS FOR THE |
| | OTHER DOORS ,WINDOWS, SHUTTERS& ROOFING. |
| | 12 )- SBC-F102.2.4: FIRE DISTRICT THE |
| | ROOF COVERINGS IN THE FIRE DISTRICT |
| | SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF A |
| | CLASS "A" OR "B" ROOF COVERINGS. THE |
| | SPECS SUBMITTED ARE NOT HIGH LIGHTED OR |
| | SPECED OUT WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO USE? |
| | 13).1997 FL ENERGY CODE 400 ENERGY CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SHELL OF THE BUILD- |
| | ING. |
| | 14)- DISCREPANCIES: THE ARCH. PLANS VS. |
| | THE STRUC. PLANS THE STRUCTTUTRAL |
| | DETAILS DO NOT MATCH,FRAMING, TRUSSES, |
| | BAR JOIST ETC. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | (561) 659-8096 EX 8412. |
