Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 23040449
Permit Number 23040449
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2023-04-21 17:25:30BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
 CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS.
 PERMIT #23040449
 5904 N FLAGLER DR
  
 1-THIS STRUCTURE IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD
 ZONE WITH THE BASE FLOOD BFE: 6 FEET BASED ON NAVD
 1988.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE REQUIRES A TWO (2)
 FOOT FREE BOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (SEC.
 18-284 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17).
 NOTE: DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO SPECIFY THE PROPOSED
 FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION IN ALL FLOOR PLANS. (NOTE:
 COORDINATE WITH CIVIL DRAWING C-1 AND ELECTRICAL AND
 PLANS).
 DURING THE PERMITTING/CONSTRUCTION OF THIS STRUCTURE
 THREE DIFFERENT FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE
 REQUIRED (SEC. 107.3.5.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS):
 A) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
 B) BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
 C) FINISHED CONSTRUCTION.
  
 NOTE:
 NEED TO PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE AND SURVEY SHOWING THE ELEVATIONS NOW FOR
 REVIEW.
  
 2- IF THE PROPOSED FINISHED ELEVATION SPECIFIED ON ITEM
 #1 ABOVE IS BELOW THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION OF 8 FT AS
 REQUIRED BY ITEM #1, THEN DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO
 PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE DESIGN OF THE
 FLOOD VENT OPENINGS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 2.7
 ASCE 24-14.
  
 3- DESIGN CRITERIA ON SHEET 1 OF 1:
 A)ENGINEER TO REVISE THE BUILDING EXPOSURE. ACCORDING
 TO SEC. 1609.4 FBC-BUILDING, THIS BUILDING-IS LOCATED
 IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT "C".
  
 B)ENGINEER TO SPECIFY THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. SEC.
 1609.1 FBC-BUILDING.
 MEAN ROOF HEIGHT: N/A IS INCORRECT. OR ENGINEER TO
 PROVIDE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING WHY THE HEIGHT IS
 NOT REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 C)ENGINEER TO SPECIFY THE DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES
 (COMPONENTS & CLADDING).
 SEC. 1609.1 FBC-BUILDING. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 4- PRODUCT APPROVALS. F.A.C. 61G20.3.001:
 A)DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE. NEED
 TO PROVIDE COMPLETE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORT,
 INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT
 CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. FAC 61G20.3.001.
 NOTE: THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE
 IT SHOWS IF PRODUCT IS APPROVED AND CURRENT CODE IN
 EFFECT. CHAPTER 553 F.S.
 NOTE: THERE ARE MANY DOORS IN THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL.
 CLERLY MARK WHICH DOOR IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. SEC.
 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 B)PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR FLOOD VENTS IS THEY ARE
 SPECIFIED AS "ENGINEERED OPENINGS" ON ITEM #2 ABOVE.
  
 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 6-DIGITAL SIGNATURE:
 A) STRUCTURAL SHEET 1 OF 1 HAVE A COPY OF THE
 ENGINEER'S SEAL AND SIGNATURE.
 DRAWING NEEDS TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL/SIGNATURE OF
 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.001
 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING
 PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS.
 NOTE: THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL. SUBMIT
 PLANS/DOCUMENTS WITH ENGINEER'S VERIFIABLE DIGITAL
 SIGNATURE.
  
 ENGINEERS
 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND
 SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 B) CIVIL SHEET C-1:
 ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF FBPE. THE "TEXT BOX LANGUAGE" MUST BE
 IDENTICAL TO THE EXAMPLES PUBLISHED BY FBPE. SEE FBPE.O
 RG/LEGAL/SIGNING-AND-SEALING-ENGINEERING-DOCUMENTS/ AND
 REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH WHEN A DIGITALLY CREATED
 SEAL IS NOT USED.
 NOTE: BASED ON THE TEXT LOCATED WITHIN THE TEXT BOX IT
 IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY
 SIGNED DOCUMENT. THE TEXT READS "THIS ITEM HAS BEEN
 DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED USING A SHA-1
 AUTHENTICATION CODE. IF USING SHA-1 AUTHENTICATION
 CODE, THEN IT IS ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED NOT DIGITALLY.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 SEE FBPE.ORG/LEGAL/SIGNING-AND-SEALING-ENGINEERING-DOCU
 MENTS/ AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND
 SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 61G15-23.005 PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNING AND
 SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 C) ELECTRICAL SHEET E1: (SIGNATURE REVIEW ONLY):
 ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF FBPE. THE "TEXT BOX LANGUAGE" MUST BE
 IDENTICAL TO THE EXAMPLES PUBLISHED BY FBPE. SEE FBPE
 .ORG/LEGAL/SIGNING-AND-SEALING-ENGINEERING-DOCUMENTS/
 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 NOTE: BASED ON THE TEXT LOCATED WITHIN THE TEXT BOX IT
 IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY
 SIGNED DOCUMENT. THE TEXT READS "THIS ITEM HAS BEEN
 DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED USING A SHA-1
 AUTHENTICATION CODE. IF USING SHA-1 AUTHENTICATION
 CODE, THEN IT IS ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED NOT DIGITALLY.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, THE TEXT BOX CANNOT BE A PART
 OF THE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE ITSELF. SEE FBPE
 .ORG/LEGAL/SIGNING-AND-SEALING-ENGINEERING-DOCUMENTS/
 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
  
 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND
 SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 61G15-23.005 PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNING AND
 SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS,
 SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND
 HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE
 REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY
 QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS,
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved