| Date |
Text |
| 2023-07-06 09:37:24 | SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3)SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #23021503 |
| | 3408 WASHINGTON RD |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD |
| | ZONE WITH THE BASE FLOOD BFE: 6 FEET BASED ON NAVD |
| | 1988. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE REQUIRES A TWO (2) |
| | FOOT FREE BOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (SEC. |
| | 18-284 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17). |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH |
| | ELEVATIONS, INCLUDING ALL EQUIPMENT SERVING THE TWO |
| | BUILDINGS. |
| | DURING THE PERMITTING/CONSTRUCTION OF THIS STRUCTURE |
| | THREE DIFFERENT FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED (SEC. 107.3.5.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS): |
| | A) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. B) BUILDING UNDER |
| | CONSTRUCTION. C) FINISHED CONSTRUCTION. |
| | NOTE: |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATE NOW FOR REVIEW. |
| | ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE SURVEY TO VERIFY ELEVATIONS |
| | SPECIFIED ON ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (1)CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WAS NOT |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | (2)PROPOSED 3408 WASHINGTON RD SURVEY DOESN'T SHOW THE |
| | PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS AND DOESN'T SHOW THE |
| | PROPOSED GRADE ELEVATIONS ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING IN |
| | ORDER TO VERIFY INFORMATION ON ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. |
| | (3)DRAWING LABELED "70400 PLOT PLN 11X17 LANDSCAPE |
| | 05-25-2023 SIGNED" IS A SURVEY SHOWING THE PROPOSED |
| | FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS OF THE MAIN HOUSE AND THE |
| | GARAGE. THE MAIN HOUSE FINISH FLOOR DOESN'T MATCH PLANS |
| | AND IS MISSING THE PROPOSED GRADE ELEVATIONS ADJACENT |
| | TO THE BUILDINGS ALSO. THIS DRAWING WAS BLOCKED BECAUSE |
| | IT WAS MISLABELED AS LANDSCAPE INSTEAD OF PROPOSED |
| | SURVEY. LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT. PLEASE PROVIDE ONLY ONE PROPOSED SURVEY WITHE |
| | THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | 3-FUTURE ELEVATOR: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) FUTURE ELEVATOR LOCATION IS NOT CLEAR. INFORMATION |
| | ON GROUND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN AND SECOND FLOOR FRAMING |
| | PLAN INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION ON PROPOSED |
| | FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED STRUCTURAL PLANS AS SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S |
| | RESPONSE LETTER WERE NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | FUTURE ELEVATOR CHASE. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED STRUCTURAL PLANS AS SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S |
| | RESPONSE LETTER WERE NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)BASED ON BUILDING SECTION 1 ON SHEET A-7.1 THE |
| | ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT WILL BE BELOW THE REQUIRED 2 FEET |
| | FREEBOARD. COORDINATE WITH SEC. R322 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | FOR EQUIPMENT PROTECTION AND ENCLOSURE CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ELEVATOR INSTALLATION. PROVIDE COMPLETE ELEVATOR |
| | INFORMATION UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT WHEN READY TO |
| | INSTALL THE ELEVATOR. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 10- EGRESS WINDOWS NOTE ON SHEET A-4.1 IS INCORRECT. |
| | SEE SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOTE WAS NOT REVISED. NEED TO REVISE |
| | THIS NOTE. IT IS INCORRECT AND IS MISLEADING. SEE SEC. |
| | R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 11- DOOR & WINDOW WIND PRESSURES TABLE ON SHEET S-5 |
| | SPECIFY EXPOSURE C-180MPH WIND SPEED. ACCORDING TO SEC. |
| | R301.2.1.4.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED |
| | IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT "C". REVISE ALL WIND DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED STRUCTURAL PLANS AS SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S |
| | RESPONSE LETTER WERE NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 12-PLYWOOD SHEATHING NAILING SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-5 : |
| | REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPECIFICATIONS TO COMPLY |
| | WITH NEW 2020 FBC-RESIDENTIAL SPECIFICATIONS. REVISE |
| | TYPE, SIZE AND SPACING. NOTE: NEED TO USE RING SHANK |
| | NAILS. ROOF SHEATHING NEEDS TO BE NAILED AT 4 INCHES |
| | O.C. IN THE FIELD AND EDGES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R803.2.3.1 AND TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: REVISE SPECIFICATIONS OR PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOWING THAT SPECIFIED NAIL TYPE AND SPACING MATCHES OR |
| | EXCEEDS TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED STRUCTURAL PLANS AS SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S |
| | RESPONSE LETTER WERE NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 13- ENERGY CALCULATIONS (MAIN HOUSE): |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)THE BUILDING'S OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT, OR OTHER |
| | AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER SHALL |
| | CERTIFY AT THE OWNER/AGENT LINE AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM |
| | THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE, AS |
| | PER SECTION 553.907, FLORIDA STATUTES, PRIOR TO |
| | RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OR |
| | RENOVATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME, BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OWNER'S NAME IS INCORRECT. PROVIDE CORRECT NAME. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 14- ENERGY CALCULATIONS (GUEST HOUSE): |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)THE BUILDING'S OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT, OR OTHER |
| | AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER SHALL |
| | CERTIFY AT THE OWNER/AGENT LINE AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM |
| | THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE, AS |
| | PER SECTION 553.907, FLORIDA STATUTES, PRIOR TO |
| | RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OR |
| | RENOVATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKEN THE CEILING FAN CREDIT. |
| | PLANS DON'T SHOW CEILING FANS FOR ALL REQUIRED ROOMS. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH PLANS. IF TAKING THE |
| | CEILING FAN CREDIT, THEN PLANS NEED TO SHOW CEILING FAN |
| | AND SIZE IN ALL THE ROOMS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R405.7.6 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | NOTE: SEE SIZE AND NUMBER OF FANS REQUIRED BASED ON |
| | ROOM SIZE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 15- PRODUCT APPROVALS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: AS REQUESTED |
| | BY THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER THE PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL |
| | BE SUBMITTED LATER. |
| | NOTE: SUBMIT FOR REVIEW AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT |
| | BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | A)EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. (NOTE: PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL. FOR EXAMPLE ENTRY DOOR, |
| | GARAGE SWING DOOR, ETC.) |
| | B)WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | C)WINDOWS AND DOORS MULLIONS (NOTE: NEED TO SPECIFY |
| | MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY PRESSURES. SEC. R301.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL). |
| | D)HURRICANE SHUTTERS IF DOORS AND WINDOWS DON'T HAVE |
| | IMPACT GLAZING. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE CITY SAMPLE. |
| | E)ROOF TILE AND CLEARLY MARK ADHESIVE PADDY SIZE TO BE |
| | USED AS REQUIRED BY CITY POLICY FOR ALL ROOFING PERMITS |
| | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC |
| | R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | F)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | G)ROOF TILE ADHESIVE ( IF USED) LISTED IN ROOF TILE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | H)HIP & RIDGE METAL SUPPORT TO BE USED. |
| | L)BALCONY UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS TO RECEIVE |
| | TILE. |
| | M)FLOOD VENTS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | N)OVERHEAD GARAGE DOORS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 17- HOUSE IS DESIGNED WITH UNVENTED ATTIC. ARCHITECT IS |
| | SPECIFYING R-30 ICYNENE SPRAY INSULATION. PROVIDE ICC |
| | EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | NOTE: THIS COULD BE A DEFERRED SUBMITAL ALSO. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ICC EVALUATION REPORT ESR-1826 SUBMITTED IS EXPIRED. IT |
| | WAS SUBJECT TO RENEWAL ON FEBRUARY 2022. SEE TOP RIGHT |
| | CORNER OF REPORT. PROVIDE CURRENT REPORT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 20- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | PERGOLAS OR TRELLIS SHOWN ON THE MAIN HOUSE AND |
| | SEPARATE GUEST HOUSE. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND |
| | CONNECTORS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED STRUCTURAL PLANS AS SPECIFIED ON ARCHITECT'S |
| | RESPONSE LETTER WERE NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 23- SHEET C-1: ENGINEER DIGITAL SIGNATURE DOESN'T SEEM |
| | TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 61G15-23.004. |
| | IT DOESN'T HAVE A TITLE BLOCK, THE REQUIRED TEXT BOX |
| | LANGUAGE. IT ONLY SHOWS DIGITALLY SIGNED BY RICHARD V |
| | REIKENIS AND THE DATE. IT DOESN'T IDENTIFY THE |
| | ENGINEER'S LICENSE NUMBER. |
| | SEE SEC. 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING |
| | AND SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS AND RESUBMIT |
| | DRAWING WITH VERIFIABLE DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF FBPE. NEED A SEPARATE TEXT BOX WITH THE |
| | TEXT BOX LANGUAGE IDENTICAL TO THE SAMPLES SHOWN BY |
| | FBPE. |
| | SEE FBPE.ORG/LEGAL/SIGNING-AND-SEALING-ENGINEERING-DOCU |
| | MENTS/ AND REVISE DIGITAL SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: THIS WAS CONFIRMED WITH THE FBPE INVESTIGATOR. |
| | |
| | SEC. 61G15-23.004 F.A.C. PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT BASED ON COMMENTS FROM ADDRESSING REVIEW |
| | REGARDING THE APPROVAL OF THE GARAGE/APARTMENT BY |
| | ZONING. |
| | 24- A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION (INCLUDING ALL |
| | SUB-PERMITS) IS REQUIRED SINCE THE GARAGE/APARTMENT WAS |
| | ASSIGNED A DIFFERENT ADDRESS (3406 WASHINGTON RD). |
| | THIS NEW BUILDING WILL REQUIRE A CERTIFICATE OF |
| | OCCUPANCY. SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION WILL FACILITATE |
| | RECORDS MANAGEMENT. SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: SAME SET OF PLANS CAN BE USED. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
