| Date |
Text |
| 2023-07-12 15:23:34 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #23021045 |
| | 348 POTTER RD |
| | |
| | 1- LOT DRAINAGE. PROPOSED WORK AFFECTS THE LOT |
| | DRAINAGE. PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING HOW THE SURFACE |
| | DRAINAGE IS KEPT WITHIN THE LOT AND NOT DIVERTED TO |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTIES. PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS: R401.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS AND SEC. |
| | 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PROPOSED SITE DRAINAGE: |
| | (A)IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE PROPOSED SITE DRAINAGE PLAN |
| | IS GOING TO KEEP THE WATER WITHIN THIS PROPERTY AND NOT |
| | GOING TOWARDS THE NEIGHBORS. THE PROPOSED RETAINING |
| | WALL DOESN'T ENCLOSE THE LOT TO KEEP THE WATER WITHING |
| | THE LOT. ALSO, THE GRADE ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED YARD |
| | DRAINS ON THE SOUTH EAST AND SOUTH WEST CORNERS IS |
| | HIGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING AREAS. IT LOOKS LIKE THE |
| | FLOW ARROWS WILL CONCENTRATE ALL THE WATER IN THE SOUTH |
| | EAST CORNER. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO SHOW HOW KEEPING THE |
| | WATER WITHIN THE LOT. |
| | SEC.107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (B) A SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | RETAINING WALL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. NOTE: CLARIFY |
| | WHAT IS "WALL TRANSITION BY OTHERS". SEC |
| | SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (C) PROPOSED RETAINING WALL: CLARIFY WHAT IS "WALL |
| | TRANSITION BY OTHERS". SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (D) DRAWINGS C-1 AND C-2 HAVE AN ENGINEER'S |
| | SELF-CERTIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE. ENGINEER CANNOT |
| | SELF-CERTIFY THE DIGITAL SIGNATURE. THIRD PARTY |
| | CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G15-23.004. |
| | (NOTE: ENGINEER TO CONTACT THE BOARD OF ENGINEER'S FOR |
| | SELF-CERTIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE QUESTIONS). |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | STAIRWAY CONSTRUCTION: DIMENSIONS, RISERS, TREADS, |
| | NOSING, HANDRAILS, GUARDRAILS, ETC. SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. R311.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | MISSING DIMENSION FOR STAIR LANDING. 10 INCH TREADS |
| | REQUIRE NOSING. PROVIDE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | NOSING. SEC. R311.7.5.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH MIN. TREAD DIMENSION SEC. |
| | R311.7.5.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR STAIRWAY |
| | FIREBLOCKING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R302.11 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DETAIL 5 ON SHEET DT-6 DON'T SHOW FIREBLOCKING IN THE |
| | REQUIRED AREAS OF SEE SEC. R302.11 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7- DEFERRED SUBMITTAL PER RESPONSE LETTER: PROVIDE |
| | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DECORATIVE SHUTTERS |
| | CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION. SPECIFY FASTENING. SEC. |
| | R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 13- PRODUCT APPROVALS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL PER RESPONSE |
| | LETTER (REVIEWED/APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD): |
| | A)ENTRY DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | B)GARAGE EXTERIOR SWING DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | C)SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | D)CASEMENT WINDOW SIZE SPECIFIED FOR THE OFFICE. |
| | E)HURRICANE SHUTTERS IF DOORS AND WINDOWS DON'T HAVE |
| | IMPACT GLAZING. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE CITY SAMPLE. |
| | F) SUBMIT ALL ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH ROOFING |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION. ROOF TILE. AND, CLEARLY MARK |
| | ADHESIVE PADDY SIZE. ROOF TILE ADHESIVE. AND, CLEARLY |
| | MARK ADHESIVE PADDY SIZE. |
| | ROOF TILE UNDERLAYMENT. AND CLEARLY MARK WHICH |
| | POLYGLASS POLYSTICK UNDERLAYMENT IS GOING TO BE USED. |
| | HIP & RIDGE METAL SUPPORT TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | 16- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME (IF AVAILABLE), |
| | CORRECT PERMIT OFFICE (CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH NOT PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY), JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION |
| | IS 604700). SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OWNER'S NAME IS INCORRECT. IT CANNOT BE "TBD". PROVIDE |
| | OWNER'S NAME. |
| | CONTRACTOR'S NAME IS INCORRECT. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)ITEM #10(B) ON PAGE 1 IS INCORRECT. THERE IS NOT WOOD |
| | FRAME WALL BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND THE MAIN HOUSE. SEE |
| | PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT BASED ON CEILING INSULATION SPECIFIED BY |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY R103.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION AND REQUESTED ON ITEM #9 ON PREVIOUS |
| | CHECKLLIST. |
| | I)R-VALUE INSULATION SPECIFIED ON ITEM #11 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH THE R-VALUE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | 17- ENGINEER OF RECORD DIGITAL SIGNATURE COMMENTS: |
| | ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF FBPE: |
| | A)THE TEXT BOX LANGUAGE MUST NOT BE A PART OF THE |
| | DIGITAL SIGNATURE ITSELF. |
| | SEE FBPE.ORG/LEGAL/SIGNING-AND-SEALING-ENGINEERING-DOCU |
| | MENTS/ AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) ALSO, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE DOCUMENT IS DIGITALLY |
| | SIGNED OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED. SEE TEXT BOX LANGUAGE |
| | FOR DIGITALLY SIGNED ITEMS AND THE TEXT BOX LANGUAGE |
| | FOR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED ITEMS. SEE FBPE.ORG/LEGAL/SIG |
| | NING-AND-SEALING-ENGINEERING-DOCUMENTS/ AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | THESE COMMENTS WERE VERIFIED WITH THE FBPE |
| | INVESTIGATOR. THE TEXT BOX REQUIREMENTS APPLY. |
| | |
| | 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND |
| | SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 61G15-23.005 PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNING AND |
| | SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
