| Date |
Text |
| 2022-11-02 16:09:01 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) THERE IS AN INDICATION OF EXTERIOR WORK ON A HIGH |
| | RISE BUILDING; HOWEVER, THE IS NO INDICATION OF |
| | PROTECTION FROM FALLING DEBRIS AROUND THE BUILDING(S) |
| | AND/OR PROTECTION OF EXIT TRAVEL PATHS. |
| | |
| | WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WORK THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF |
| | SCAFFOLDING, BOOM LIFTS, ETC... |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 1 |
| | |
| | 1.7.12 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1.7.12.1 THE AHJ SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE |
| | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 1.7.12.6 PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE AHJ PRIOR TO |
| | THE ALTERATION OF THE MEANS OF EGRESS OR FIRE |
| | PROTECTION SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | |
| | FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORD, PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE A |
| | LIFE SAFETY SHEET THAT INCLUDES PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION |
| | AROUND THE BUILDING AND SPECIFICALLY THE EXIT TRAVEL |
| | PATHS OR BLOCKED EXITS FROM THE BUILDING AND PROPOSED |
| | ALTERNATE ROUTING. |
| | |
| | SHOULD NO PROTECTION BE REQUIRED PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | DETAILED NARRATIVE AND/OR PLAN SHEETS EXPLAINING WHY |
| | PROTECTION IS NOT REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
