| Plan Review Notes For Permit 22091136 |
| Permit Number |
22091136 |
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
| Sequence Number |
2 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-03 14:21:15 | 2ND SIGNATURE REVIEW | | | RESULTS: CORRECTIONS NEEDED | | | | | | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, CBO, BN, PX, CFM | | | PLANS EXAMINER II | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | (561) 805-6726 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | CODES IN EFFECT: | | | 2020 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION W/2017 WEST | | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | | CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION | | | NFPA 70 2017 EDITION NEC 2017 | | | | | | COMMENTS FROM THE 1ST REVIEW HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | SEE BELOW: | | | | | | ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS AND RE-SUBMIT: | | | | | | NOTICE: THE COPY OF THE SURVEY DOES NOT REQUIRE A VALID | | | DIGITAL SIGNATURE. | | | THE SITE PLAN DOES REQUIRE A VALID DIGITAL SIGNATURE. | | | | | | 1. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER AND | | | SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE A | | | VALID DIGITAL SIGNATURE. A SCAN OF A WET SEAL AND | | | SIGNATURE OR DIGITAL SIGNATURE IS NOT CONSIDERED A | | | VALID DIGITAL SIGNATURE. | | | ALL ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY ARCHITECTS OR | | | ENGINEERS MUST BE DIGITALLY SIGNED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | 61G1-16 AND 61G15, F.A.C. | | | | | | 2.SUBMIT PLANS WITH A VALID DIGITAL SIGNATURE. | | | FBC 107.2.1 ALL INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS | | | AND ACCOMPANYING DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE | | | OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. (SEE ALSO | | | SECTION 107.3.5), CHPT. 471, F.S. & 61G15 AND CHPT. | | | 481, F.S. & 61G1. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | |
|