| Date |
Text |
| 2022-11-28 16:13:43 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE A SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE APPROVED FDOT DRIVEWAY/ROW |
| | PERMIT FOR THE CONNECTION TO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PAVING PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE APPROVED SITE AND |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE NEW SOUTHERN |
| | PARKING LOT. THE NEW PARKING, DUMPSTER AND CHILLER |
| | LAYOUT ALSO DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS INCLUDED WITH THE |
| | PERMIT PLANS FOR THE NEW BUILDING. ALL THE PLANS MUST |
| | SHOW ACCURATE, CONSISTENT, CODE COMPLIANT CONDITIONS. A |
| | MINOR SITE PLAN AMENDMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| | PLANNING DIVISION AND APPROVED, PRIOR TO ZONING |
| | APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT. THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW |
| | WILL INCLUDE REVIEWS BY THE CITY'S SANITATION, |
| | STORMWATER AND LANDSCAPE REVIEWERS TO VERIFY THAT ALL |
| | CODE PROVISIONS STILL COMPLY. |
| | |
| | 4) THE FLUMES, THE RETENTION AREA AND THE PERIMETER |
| | BERM AT THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE PARKING AREA ARE NOT |
| | SHOWN ON OR MATCH THE APPROVED SITE OR LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 5) THE CHANGES LISTED IN COMMENTS 3 AND 4 SHOW DIRECT |
| | CONFLICT WITH TREES THAT ARE SHOWN AS REMAINING IN |
| | PLACE AND THE EXISTING PERIMETER BUFFER AS WELL AS THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF RELOCATED TREES ON THE APPROVED |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. THE CIVIL PLANS MUST MATCH WHAT |
| | WAS APPROVED ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE |
| | EXISTING LANDSCAPE ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE IS |
| | NOT PERMITTED TO BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 6) THERE APPEARS TO BE A FIRE HYDRANT AND RELATED BACK |
| | FLOW EQUIPMENT THAT IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH TREES |
| | SHOWN ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN ON THE EAST SIDE |
| | OF THE NEW PARKING LOT. |
| | |
| | 7) THERE IS AN "EX 1 STORY BUILDING" AND A SHED THAT |
| | ARE SHOWN AS REMAINING ON THE CIVIL PLANS THAT ARE |
| | SHOWN REMOVED ON THE SITE PLAN. THESE BUILDINGS MUST BE |
| | REMOVED, OR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | SITE PLAN TOTALS ON A MINOR SITE PLAN AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 8) THE PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN MUST INCLUDE THE TWO-FOOT |
| | OVERHANG AREA FOR THE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE 16 FEET |
| | DEEP WITH THE D-CURB AT THEIR HEAD. ADDITIONALLY, THE |
| | CITY DOES NOT PERMIT SINGLE STRIPPING FOR PARKING |
| | SPACES SO THE NOTES SHALL ACCURATELY REFLECT THIS. |
| | |
| | 9) THE PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN MUST CLEARLY SHOW THAT ALL |
| | OF THE PARKING SPACES ALONG THE CURVE ON THE WESTERN |
| | DRIVE HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 8.5 FEET. IF ANY SPACES |
| | DO NOT MEET THIS WIDTH AND ARE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET IN |
| | WIDTH, THEY MAY BE DESIGNATED AS A COMPACT SPACE. |
| | |
| | 10) THE PARKING STALL DETAIL ON SHEET C-8 DOES NOT MEET |
| | CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY REQUIRES DOUBLE LINES. |
| | PLEASE CONTACT STAFF IF THE STANDARD DETAIL IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 11) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
