| Date |
Text |
| 2023-02-21 14:40:57 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY THAT WAS UPLOADED WITH |
| | THE PERMIT DOES NOT COVER THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED |
| | FENCE. IT APPEARS TO BE THE SHEET NORTH OF THE AREA OF |
| | WORK. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SURVEY FOR THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | PROPOSED FENCE. STAFF NEEDS THIS TO VERIFY THE LOCATION |
| | OF THE EXISTING ENCLOSURE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE |
| | EXISTING ENCLOSURE AND SPECIFICALLY THAT THE REQUIRED |
| | 50-FOOT LONG LOADING SPACE IS MAINTAINED AT THE FRONT |
| | OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE OPENING. IT APPEARS FROM THE |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED THAT THE BELLSOUTH EASEMENT IS NOT |
| | WITHIN THE LIMITS OF WORK. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PROPOSED FENCE IS TO ENCLOSE BOTH A PROPOSED |
| | GENERATOR AND AN EXISTING DUMPSTER. THE CITY'S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE |
| | CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY |
| | DURABLE WOOD AND STEEL (NOTE: A FREESTANDING PVC FENCE |
| | IS PERMITTED). IT APPEARS THE ENTIRE FENCE IS PROPOSED |
| | TO USE A WINDSCREEN, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED FOR |
| | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES. ADDITIONALLY, THE SIZE OF THE |
| | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOES NOT CONFORM TO MINIMUM CITY |
| | STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE RECENTLY UPLOADED PLANS ARE POOR QUALITY AND |
| | STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY MANY OF THE DETAILS, TO |
| | INCLUDE HOW THE GENERATOR SCREENING IS BEING ADDRESSED. |
| | PROVIDE CLEAR PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4) THE GENERATOR IS REQUIRED TO BE SCREENED BUT IS NOT |
| | SUBJECT TO THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS THE DUMPSTER, OTHER |
| | THAN SLATS IN THE CHAIN LINK ARE NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE MATERIAL AND |
| | DIMENSIONS FOR EACH SECTION OF FENCE. ANY CHANGE IN THE |
| | VALUE OF THE PERMIT TO COMPLY WITH THE CHANGE IN |
| | MATERIAL FOR THE CODE COMPLIANT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MUST |
| | BE UPDATED ON THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |