| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-15 12:05:57 | 9/15/22 ??? FAILED |
| | |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED: |
| | 1. PLEASE CONFIRM IF THE |
| | IDENTIFIED/INDICATED/DEMONSTRATED ???DSC SITE OFFICE??? |
| | ON THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN IS THE PROPOSED |
| | ???CONSTRUCTION JOBSITE TRAILER???. IF NOT, PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED |
| | ???CONSTRUCTION JOBSITE TRAILER??? ON A REVISED SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | 2. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE SETBACK |
| | DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED ???CONSTRUCTION JOBSITE |
| | TRAILER??? ON A REVISED SITE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK DESIGN |
| | STANDARDS OF THE CURRENT COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT |
| | ZONING DISTRICT PER ORDINANCE NO. 4146-08. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS (THAT REQUIRE SEPARATE |
| | PERMITS) TO BE ADDRESSED: |
| | 3. THE SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED FENCE WITHIN THE |
| | REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT |
| | ALLOWANCE OF 48 INCHES (4 FEET) ACCORDING TO THE |
| | CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | SUBSECTION 94-302(C)(1). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | SITE PLAN DEMONSTRATING THIS SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | FENCE NOT EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED. |
| | 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS |
| | OF THE PROPOSED ???PROJECT SIGN??? AND ???SITE SAFETY |
| | SIGNS??? ON A REVISED SITE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SIGNS MAXIMUM SIGN |
| | FACE SIZE DESIGN STANDARD OF THE CURRENT COMMERCIAL |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT PER ORDINANCE NO. |
| | 4146-08. |
| | |
| | |
| | KEVIE DEFRANC |
| | PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-822-1449 |
| | |
