| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-03 07:58:59 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | 2. FBC 107, SHOW THE PROPOSED SITE WALL AND FOUNDATION |
| | RELATIVE TO THE PROPERTY LINES. - 5TH REVIEW, THERE ARE |
| | THREE DETAILS - ECCENTRIC FOOTER FOR SITE WALL, FOOTER |
| | FOR SITE WALL, FOOTER FOR "ENTRY PIER DETAIL". THE SITE |
| | PLAN GRAPHICALLY APPEARS TO DEPICT PIERS AT THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. SINCE IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT THE FOOTINGS |
| | WILL NOT ENCROACH THE PROPERTY LINE AS DRAWING, REVISE |
| | THE SITE PLAN TO SHOW DETAILS PROPOSED. IT APPEARS THAT |
| | AN ECCENTRIC FOOTER PIER DETAIL IS REQUIRED, OR THE |
| | PIER SHOULD BE SET BACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE IN SOME |
| | LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3. FBC R 301, PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED WALL. THIS SHOULD INCLUDE WIND DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA. - 5TH REVIEW, PLAN WAS REVISED TO INCLUDE |
| | LANGUAGE CITING FBC 1616 FOR FENCES. NOTE THAT A WALL |
| | AND COLUMNS ARE PROPOSED (A STRUCTURE), NOT A FENCE. |
| | ALSO NOTE THAT THE SECTION CITED IS FOR HIGH VELOCITY |
| | HURRICANE ZONE WHICH INCLUDES BROWARD AND DADE COUNTIES |
| | ONLY. THERE ARE NO WIND REQUIREMENTS IN PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY (NON-HVHZ) FOR FENCES. THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION |
| | IS NOT A FENCE, IT IS CONSIDERED A STRUCTURE, SO |
| | RESISTANCE TO WIND IS REQUIRED. REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY |
| | WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE SITE WALL AND PIERS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
