| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-21 16:33:44 | RESIDENTIAL (R3)ADDITION/ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22061666 |
| | 6205 WASHINGTON RD |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. |
| | ***IMPORTANT****CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION |
| | IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- UNABLE TO PERFORM REVIEW. MISSING |
| | STRUCTURAL/ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF |
| | PROPOSED ADDITION/ALTERATION. SEC. 107.5.5.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET 8.0: PROVIDE SECTION |
| | DETAIL FOR NEW (2)1-3/4"X16" LVL BEAM SHOWING HOW THE |
| | SIMPSON HANGER HU314-2 IS INSTALLED AT EACH END OF |
| | BEAM. NOTE: ACCORDING TO WALL SECTION S1/5.0 THIS BEAM |
| | IS SITTING ON TOP OF THE MASONRY WALL. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B)ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET 8.0: THERE IS NOT BEAM |
| | SCHEDULE PROVIDING SPECIFICATIONS FOR BEAM ML2 SHOWN ON |
| | THE FRONT AND REAR ADDITIONS. PROVIDE BEAM SCHEDULE. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | C)ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING |
| | SPECIFICATIONS TO COMPLY WITH NEW 2020 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. NAIL SPACING TO COMPLY TABLE R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NAIL SPACING TO BE 4" 0.C. |
| | NOTE: REVISE SPECIFICATIONS OR PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOWING THAT SPECIFIED NAIL TYPE AND SPACING MATCHES OR |
| | EXCEEDS TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENTS |
| | |
| | D)ENGINEER TO PROVIDE DETAIL OF NEW BEARING KNEE WALL |
| | OVER EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE AS SPECIFIED ON WALL |
| | SECTION S3/5.1. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND |
| | CONNECTORS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | E) ENGINEER TO SPECIFY ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY VENT |
| | SIZE AND LOCATION. |
| | |
| | F)PROVIDE DOOR AND WINDOW STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL |
| | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R609.7.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY STRUCTURAL BUCK SIZE AND |
| | FASTENING. |
| | NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | THE DOOR/WINDOW FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | G)SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION DETAIL ON WALL SECTIONS: ENGINEER |
| | TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE OF METAL PLASTER |
| | BASE FOR CEILINGS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 3 OF |
| | ASTM C1063. |
| | NOTE: ALSO, PROVIDE DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR CEILING |
| | CONSTRUCTION AT NEW MASTER LANAI. |
| | |
| | H)SHEET 6.1: ENGINEER TO REVISE END ZONE DISTANCE. THE |
| | MINIMUM DIMENSION IS 4'-0" NOT 3'-0" AS REQUIRED BY |
| | NOTE "A" ON FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | I)TRUSS PACKAGE NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| | NOTE: PLEASE DON'T RESUBMIT THE TRUSS PACKAGE AFTER IT |
| | IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE APPROVED |
| | TRUSS PACKAGE NEEDS TO BE HANDLED TO THE BUILDING |
| | INSPECTOR DURING THE FRAMING INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | J) INTERIOR DESIGN DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED. IF CONTRACTOR WANT TO SUBMIT THEM, THEN THEY |
| | NEED TO BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE INTERIOR |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY CHAPER 481 F.S. WHEN |
| | SUBMITTING THEM FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2- PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 |
| | FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | JELD-WEN FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16708-R13 IS |
| | INCOMPLETE. NEED INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | B)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)WINDOW MULLIONS (NOTE: NEED TO SPECIFY MULLION SIZE |
| | TO VERIFY PRESSURES. SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | D)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E)ROOF TILE AND CLEARLY MARK ADHESIVE PADDY SIZE TO BE |
| | USED AS REQUIRED BY CITY POLICY FOR ALL ROOFING PERMITS |
| | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC |
| | R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL17330-R4 IS INCOMPLETE. |
| | MISSING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. ALSO, NEED TO |
| | SPECIFY PADDY SIZE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F)ROOF TILE ADHESIVE LISTED IN ROOF TILE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | G)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SINGLE PLY ROOF SYSTEMS FL14318-R18 SUBMITTED IS NOT A |
| | ROOF TILE UNDERLAYMENT. THIS IS ROOFING ASSEMBLY FOR |
| | FLAT ROOFS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | H)HIP & RIDGE METAL SUPPORT TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOTE: ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT INFO ON PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SCHEDULE ON SHEET 3.1 IS INCORRECT. SINGLE PLY ROOF |
| | SYSTEMS FL14318-R18 SUBMITTED IS NOT A ROOF TILE |
| | UNDERLAYMENT. THIS IS ROOFING ASSEMBLY FOR FLAT ROOFS. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED AND INCLUDE MISSING PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A)OK. |
| | B)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ON PAGE 1 IS INCORRECT. SEE PLANS |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SECTION R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NUMBER OF BEDROOMS IS INCORRECT AGAIN. SEE PLANS AND |
| | REVISE. |
| | |
| | D)OK. |
| | E)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F)CEILING TYPE INFORMATION ON PAGE 1 IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | CLARIFY WHY ENTERING TILE, SLATE, CONC.?. THIS IS NOT A |
| | CEILING TYPE. ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY IF THE CEILING IS |
| | VENTED OR NOT. THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SECTION |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR |
| | REVIEW. THIS INFORMATION WILL BE REVIEWED WHEN PLANS |
| | ARE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CEILING R-VALUE DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | SPECIFIES R20 NOT R25. |
| | |
| | G)OK. |
| | H)OK. |
| | I)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | J)DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 CAN NOT BE REVIEWED AT |
| | THIS TIME. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. THIS INFORMATION WILL BE |
| | REVIEWED WHEN PLANS ARE SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THAT DOORS WITH GLAZING NEED TO BE |
| | ENTERED IN THE GLAZING SECTION NOT IN DOORS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DOORS ORIENTATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | K)WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 4 CAN NOT BE REVIEWED AT |
| | THIS TIME. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. THIS INFORMATION WILL BE |
| | REVIEWED WHEN PLANS ARE SUBMITTED: WINDOWS AREA, AND |
| | OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | WINDOWS ORIENTATION, MATERIAL, AND OVERHANG SEPARATIOON |
| | DON'T MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | L)BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | M)TYPICALLY THE ATTIC VENT RATIO IS 1/150. ENGINEER |
| | CERTIFYING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SPECIFIES 1/300 |
| | ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 4. PLANS DON'T SHOW THIS |
| | VENTILATION RATIO. |
| | ENGINEER CERTIFYING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL WHEN |
| | SPECIFYING A VENT RATIO OF 1/300. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
