| Plan Review Notes For Permit 22060558 |
| Permit Number |
22060558 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
3 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-02 12:58:14 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) | | | FBC B = FBC BUILDING | | | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY | | | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | | | | | FROM PREVIOUS LIST, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1. SUPERSIM 90 WAS PROPOSED AND PASSED PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | NOW WHISPERMAT CS DATA SHEET WAS UPLOADED. WHICH | | | PRODUCT IS PROPOSED? | | | | | | FBC B 1207, WE HAVE TEST REPORTS ON FILE FOR BOTH | | | PRODUCTS. | | | | | | TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO MISUNDERSTANDING, REVISE THE | | | FLOOR PLAN TO STATE THE UNDERLAYMENT PROPOSED. | | | | | | 2. NEW COMMENT - THE FLOOR PLAN IS ILLEGIBLE AND DOES | | | NOT INDICATE WHICH UNDERLAYMENT IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | IS THE PROPOSED UNDERLAYMENT SUPERSIM 90 OR WHISPERMAT | | | CS? ONLY ONE SHOULD BE PROPOSED UNLESS EACH IS BEING | | | INSTALLED IN DIFFERENT AREAS. | | | | | | |
|
