| Plan Review Notes For Permit 22060301 |
| Permit Number |
22060301 |
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2022-06-21 10:43:07 | SIGNATURE REVIEW FAILED | | | 1) SUBMITTED PAPER DOCUMENTS LABELED WIND LOAD | | | CERTIFICATION APPEARS TO BE A COPY OF AN ELECTRINICALLY | | | SIGNED DOCUMENT, AIR SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY APPEARS TO | | | BE A COPY OF A WET SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENT AND | | | DOCUMENT E6.1 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SIGNED AS REQUIRED. | | | PLEASE CORRECT THESE ISSUES AS OUTLINED BELOW. | | | | | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND | | | SIGNED. | | | | | | UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN TO THE | | | SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF APPLICABLE) | | | AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX.. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. | | | | | | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO | | | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | | | | | PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO | | | [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS | | | | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6746 | | | |
|