| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-01 17:51:20 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE(R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22060290 |
| | 1001 WINDSOR AVE |
| | |
| | PROVISO NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO ONCE |
| | CLEAR/LEGIBLE PLANS ARE UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES APPLY (EXCEPT FOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL). |
| | |
| | ***IMPORTANT |
| | ****CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED |
| | AT THIS TIME OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION |
| | BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7- NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A)FORM 401-10 WAS SUBMITTED. NEED TO SUBMIT CURRENT |
| | 405-2020 FORM. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B)ITEM #5 ON PAGE 1 SPECIFIES WORST CASE SCENARIO. |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SITE SPECIFIC AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 (4) FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C)CONCRETE BLOCK INSULATION R-VALUE DOESN???T MATCH |
| | R-VALUE SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)REVISE SPACE INFORMATION ON PAGE 2. NUMBER OF |
| | OCCUPANTS CAN NOT BE 3.5. NEED TO ROUND UP THE NUMBER. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E)REVISE DOOR ORIENTIN ON PAGE 3. ENTRY DOO IS ON THE |
| | EAST SIDE. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | F)REVISE WINDOWS INFORMATION TO MATCH PLANS. REVISE |
| | WINDOWS ORIENTATION, WINDOWS FRAME TYPE (ALUMINUM, NOT |
| | VINYL), WINDOWS AREA AND WINDOWS OVERHANG DEPTH AND |
| | SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS. ALSO, THERE IS NOT GLASS |
| | BLOCK ON PLANS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 8- ALL RESUBMITTED PLANS ARE NOT LEGIBLE. NEED TO |
| | UPLOAD CLEAR AND LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PLANS ARE STILL NOT LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | 9- ENGINEER TO REVISE SITE DRAINAGE PLAN ON SHEET 8. |
| | THE PROPOSED GRADE AT THE SWALE AREA IS HIGHER THAN THE |
| | ADJACENT GRADE. ALSO, IT DOESN'T MATCH SECTION DETAILS |
| | A-A, B-B AND C-C. |
| | ACCORDING TO SECTION DETAILS A-A, B-B AND C-C THE GRADE |
| | IS HIGHER AT THE PERIMETER OF THE LOT. ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD TO PROVIDE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING |
| | HOW THE RAISED GRADE IS SUPPORTED. IF RETAINING WALLS |
| | ARE REQUIRED, THEN SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS, SEC. 105.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. R401.3 FC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | UNABLE TO READ THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
