| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-03 17:37:27 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22060290 |
| | 1001 WINDSOR AVE |
| | |
| | 7- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | A) NEED TO COMPLETE THE "INSTALLED" INFORMATION ON PAGE |
| | 1 AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ON SAME |
| | SHEET. SEC. R101.5.1.1.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | NOTE: IF ALL OF THE VALUES LISTED UNDER CLIMATE ZONE 1 |
| | ARE NOT INSTALLED, THEN THIS PRESCRIPTIVE FORM CANNOT |
| | BE USED. SEE SCOPE INFORMATION ON TOP OF GENERAL |
| | INSTRUCTIONS OF FORM 402-2020 SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | B)NEED TO COMPLETE THE "INSTALLED EFFICIENCY LEVEL" |
| | INFORMATION ON PAGE 2 AS REQUIRED BY THE NOTE ON TOP OF |
| | SAME SHEET. SPECIFY THE DUCT R-VALUE. SEC. R101.5.1.1.1 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | R-VALUE SPECIFIED IS INCORRECT. DUCTS R-VALUE IN |
| | UNCONDITIONED ATTICS IS R-8 NOT R-6. |
| | ALSO, SPECIFY LOCATION OF AIR HANDLER. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 8- ALL RESUBMITTED PLANS ARE NOT LEGIBLE. NEED TO |
| | UPLOAD CLEAR AND LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PLANS NEED TO BE CLEAR TO BE REVIEWED AND STAMPED. |
| | THOSE WILL BE THE OFFICIAL APPROVED PLANS. IF THE |
| | ORIGINALS RE NOT CLEAR, THEN THE PLANS WILL NOT BE |
| | LEGIBLE WHEN PRINTING FOR THE JOB SITE EITHER. |
| | MECHANICAL REVIEWER HAS COMMENTS REGARDING THIS ISSUE |
| | ALSO. |
| | WE NEED LEGIBLE COPIES FOR RECORDS MANAGEMENT. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 9- ENGINEER TO REVISE SITE DRAINAGE PLAN ON SHEET 8. |
| | THE PROPOSED GRADE AT THE SWALE AREA IS HIGHER THAN THE |
| | ADJACENT GRADE. ALSO, IT DOESN'T MATCH SECTION DETAILS |
| | A-A, B-B AND C-C. |
| | ACCORDING TO SECTION DETAILS A-A, B-B AND C-C THE GRADE |
| | IS HIGHER AT THE PERIMETER OF THE LOT. ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD TO PROVIDE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING |
| | HOW THE RAISED GRADE IS SUPPORTED. IF RETAINING WALLS |
| | ARE REQUIRED, THEN SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS, SEC. 105.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. R401.3 FC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DRAINAGE PLAN IS NOT LEGIBLE. UNABLE TO REVIEW. |
| | ALSO, ENGINEER DOESN'T SHOW HOW RAISING THE GRADE AT |
| | THE PERIMETER OF THE LOT. RETAINING WALL REQUIRED? |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
