| Date |
Text |
| 2023-02-02 15:19:18 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT |
| | PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY (21120234) MUST BE APPROVED |
| | PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. THE PLANS ON THIS |
| | ELECTRIC PERMIT AND THE ONES ULTIMATELY RESUBMITTED |
| | WITH THE WCF ROW PERMIT NEED TO MATCH. THESE COMMENTS |
| | MIRROR THOSE PROVIDED FOR THE WCF ROW PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THIS LOCATION IS WITHIN A HISTORIC |
| | DISTRICT. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE STATE HISTORIC |
| | PRESERVATION OFFICE APPROVAL OF THIS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 3) REPEAT UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY ONLY PROVIDES THE |
| | HEIGHT OF A CAMERA POLE AT 10 FEET IN HEIGHT IN THE |
| | VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY POLE. THE |
| | ENGINEERING SITE PLAN CALLS OUT A LIGHT POLE THAT IS 14 |
| | FEET IN HEIGHT. PER CITY CODE, NEITHER WILL PERMIT THE |
| | PROPOSED 24-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS FACILITY POLE SHOWN ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN AND THE RAYCAP POLE SPECIFICATION PAGES, |
| | NOR THE 28-FOOT TALL POLE SHOWN ON SHEETS C-3, E-2 AND |
| | E-3. |
| | |
| | A. THERE APPEAR TO BE NEARBY POLES THAT ARE TALLER THAN |
| | THE LABELED POLES. PROVIDE THIS HEIGHT DIMENSION SO |
| | THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PROPOSED WIRELESS FACILITY |
| | POLE DOES NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT ALLOWANCE. |
| | B. ALL SHEETS NEED TO SHOW CONSISTENT, CODE COMPLIANT |
| | POLE HEIGHTS. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS THE |
| | PROPOSED POLE AT 16.7 FEET FROM THE SPRUCE AVENUE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY. STAFF LOCATED A SURVEY FOR THE HOUSE ON |
| | THE SOUTH SIDE OF 28TH STREET, WHICH SHOWS A 15.6-FOOT |
| | SETBACK FROM SPRUCE AVENUE. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 78-411(B)(2) OF THE CITY CODE |
| | WHICH REQUIRES THAT THE POLE BE NOT DIRECTLY IN FRONT |
| | OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE, THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE |
| | POLE MUST BE SHOWN NO FURTHER THAN 15.6 FEET FROM THE |
| | SPRUCE AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE POLE NEEDS TO BE |
| | SHIFTED APPROXIMATELY TWO AND A HALF FEET TO THE EAST. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PLANS SHOW THE HANDHOLE EXCAVATION AND THE BORE |
| | PIT EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO A COM LINE AND AN |
| | UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE, RESPECTIVELY. IN ORDER TO |
| | VERIFY THAT THE INSTALLATION WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH |
| | THE EXISTING FACILITIES, PROVIDE A PUBLIC UTILITY |
| | LETTER OF NO OBJECTION FROM THE COM PROVIDER(S), MOST |
| | LIKELY AT&T OR COMCAST AND FPL. |
| | |
| | 6) THE POLE STYLE MEETS CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE POLE |
| | COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP 7042 TRAFFIC |
| | GREY A. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
