| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-07 17:06:56 | RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION FIFTH BUILDING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22050916 |
| | 372 FOREST HILL BLVD |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECT TO PAY $3775.00 FOR FOUR TIMES THE PLAN |
| | REVIEW PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 9-RESPONSE LETTER STATES "EXISTING ROOF IS VENTED, |
| | PLEASE SEE SHEET A1-4.4 FOR VENT LOCATION, CALCULATION |
| | AND SIZES. ALSO, PLEASE SEE MEPS ENERGY CALC SHEET |
| | CORRECTIONS. ICYNENE INSULATION REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NEW FLAT ROOF IS UNVENTED |
| | BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE AN ATTIC." |
| | |
| | ARCHITECT AND MEP ENGINEER NEED TO COORDINATE PLANS AND |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND DELAYS |
| | AND AVOID THE PLAN REVIEW FEE PER FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | 553.80(2)(B). |
| | CROSS SECTIONS AND DETAILS SHOWN ON REVISED SHEET |
| | A1-4.2 SHOW ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION ON THE ROOF THERMAL |
| | ENVELOPE (BELOW ROOF SHEATHING) FOR EXISTING PITCHED |
| | ROOF. ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION IS TYPICALLY USED WHEN |
| | THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS DESIGNING AN UNVENTED ATTIC. |
| | IF SPECIFYING UNVENTED ATTIC THEN CLARIFY WHY |
| | SPECIFYING ROOF ATTIC VENTILATION ON PROPOSED ROOF PLAN |
| | ON SHEET A1-4.4?. SEE SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR |
| | VENTED AND UNVENTED ATTICS INFORMATION AND REVISE PLANS |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | FLAT ROOF IS OK AS AN UNVENTED ATTIC WITH THE ICYNENE |
| | R-30 INSULATION. |
| | |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE REVISED TO REFLECT THE |
| | CORRECT INFORMATION. FIRST, NEED TO COORDINATE WITH |
| | ARCHITECT IF EXISTING ROOF IS GOING TO BE VENTED OR NOT |
| | AND NEED TO ADD THE UNVENTED FLAT ROOF AREAS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (A)RESPONSE LETTER SAYS "ALL ROOFS WILL BE VENTED. |
| | ICYNENE HAS BEEN REMOVED AS INSULATION TYPE". |
| | EXISTING-SECTION 02/A1-4.2 STILL SHOWS ICYNENE R-30 |
| | INSULATION. STILL NO CLEAR IF DESIGNING VENTED OR |
| | UNVENTED ATTIC. ALSO, CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE OF R-30 |
| | INSULATION (BATT INSULATION???).SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: ALSO. LOCATION OF INSULATION IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | SECTION SHOWS INSULATION BELOW THE ROOF RAFTER. THIS |
| | LOCATION DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EITHER A VENTED OR |
| | UNVENTED ATTIC. VENTED ATTIC HAVE THE INSULATION ABOVE |
| | THE CEILING. UNVENTED ATTICS HAVE THE INSULATION JUST |
| | BELOW THE ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE ALL SECTIONS AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEE SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR OPTIONS FOR |
| | VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #12 |
| | BELOW REGARDING ATTIC VENTILATION AND REVISE ALL |
| | SECTIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (B)PROPOSED-SECTION 01/A1-4.2 SHOWS ICYNENE R-30 |
| | INSULATION IN THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE FLAT ROOF AND |
| | R-30 INSULATION ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE SAME FLAT |
| | ROOF. STILL NO CLEAR IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED |
| | ATTIC. |
| | NEW ROOF DETAIL 04/A1-4.2 FOR THE FLAT ROOF SPECIFIES |
| | R-30 INSULATION BUT IT DOESN'T SHOW ANY VENTILATION. |
| | ALSO, PROPOSED-ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A1-4.1 |
| | STATES "NOTE: NO VENTILATION" ON FRONT AND REAR FLAT |
| | ROOFS. REVISE ALL PLANS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID |
| | MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE OF R-30 INSULATION. IF USING |
| | R-30 BATT INSULATION, THEN ROOF CROSS VENTILATION IS |
| | REQUIRED. ALSO, R-30 INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON 2X6 ROOF |
| | RAFTERS SPECIFIED ON FOR FRONT FLAT ROOF. |
| | |
| | (C)PROPOSED-SECTION 01/A1-4.2 SHOWS ICYNENE R-30 |
| | INSULATION ON THE PITCHED ROOF ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE. |
| | NOTE: ALSO. LOCATION OF INSULATION IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | SECTION SHOWS INSULATION BELOW THE ROOF RAFTER. THIS |
| | LOCATION DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EITHER A VENTED OR |
| | UNVENTED ATTIC. VENTED ATTIC HAVE THE INSULATION ABOVE |
| | THE CEILING. UNVENTED ATTICS HAVE THE INSULATION JUST |
| | BELOW THE ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE ALL SECTIONS AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEE SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR OPTIONS FOR |
| | VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #12 |
| | BELOW REGARDING ATTIC VENTILATION AND REVISE ALL |
| | SECTIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (D)ROOF VENTS SHOWN ON PROPOSED-ROOF PLAN ON SHEET |
| | A1-4.4 AND PROPOSED-ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A1-4.1 DON'T |
| | MATCH. NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY ONE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN TO |
| | AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 12- RESPONSE LETTER STATES: "PLEASE SEE REVISED SHEET |
| | A1-4.1 INDICATING ROOF PITCH". |
| | THIS IS INCORRECT. THE REQUEST WAS TO SPECIFY ROOF |
| | VENTILATION NOT ROOF PITCH. READ SEC. R806 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION |
| | FOR CROSS VENTILATION FOR ALL ROOF AREAS. (SEE NOTE ON |
| | ITEM #12 ABOVE. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ITEM #9 ABOVE). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE RESPONSE COMMENTS ON ITEM #9 ABOVE AND COORDINATE |
| | AS REQUIRED TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | ROOF CROSS VENTILATION SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SPECIFY VENTS SIZE AND LOCATION FOR FLAT AND PITCHED |
| | ROOFS. |
| | NOTE: THERE ARE FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS. IF DESIGNING |
| | UNVENTED ATTICS, THEN SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH SEC. |
| | R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | REVISE ROOF VENTILATION CALCULATIONS TO INCLUDE THE |
| | FLAT ROOFS IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE DESIGNED AS VENTED |
| | ROOFS. |
| | |
| | 13- DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE: |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL: |
| | A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS. |
| | D)FIXED WINDOWS. |
| | E) REAR SWING DOOR. |
| | F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR. |
| | G) NEW GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | 14- ADDITIONAL DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: IF USING ICYNENE |
| | INSULATION, THEN PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE |
| | ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 17- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | B)CEILING INFORMATION NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH ITEM |
| | #9 ABOVE. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE THERMAL ENVELOPE AND |
| | SPECIFY IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. NOTE: |
| | THERE ARE SOME FLAT ROOFS IN THIS PROJECT THAT NEED TO |
| | BE CONSIDERED ALSO. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS CANNOT BE REVIEWED UNTIL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE |
| | CORRECTED TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTIC |
| | DESIGN FOR FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED TO AVOID MORE |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
