| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-26 11:19:59 | RESIDENTIAL(R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION FOURTH BUILDING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22050916 |
| | 372 FOREST HILL BLVD |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 9- BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS |
| | TO DEPICT THE BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE. NEED TO |
| | SPECIFY INSULATION MATERIALS AND THEIR R-VALUES.(ROOF, |
| | WALLS, RAISED FLOOR ABOVE GARAGE, ETC.) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | NOTE: KEEP IN MIND THERE ARE FLAT ROOFS AND PITCHED |
| | ROOFS. AND, COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO |
| | AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | PROPOSED SECTION 01/A1-4.3 ON SHEET A1-4.3 SHOWS |
| | ICYNENE INSULATION IN THE PITCHED AND FLAT ROOF AREAS. |
| | IT LOOKS LIKE ARCHITECT IS DESIGNING AN UNVENTED ATTIC. |
| | IF SPECIFYING UNVENTED ATTIC THEN ARCHITECT TO CLARIFY |
| | WHY SPECIFYING ROOF ATTIC VENTILATION ON DETAIL |
| | 03/A1-4.3 AND DETAIL 04/A1-4.3 ON THE SAME SHEET? |
| | PROVIDE ICYNENE INSULATION ICC EVALUATION REPORT. |
| | ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE EVALUATION REPORT PRIOR |
| | TO SUBMITTAL. (NOTE: THIS REPORT MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER |
| | AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSTALLATION). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES "EXISTING ROOF IS VENTED, PLEASE |
| | SEE SHEET A1-4.4 FOR VENT LOCATION, CALCULATION AND |
| | SIZES. ALSO, PLEASE SEE MEPS ENERGY CALC SHEET |
| | CORRECTIONS. ICYNENE INSULATION REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NEW FLAT ROOF IS UNVENTED |
| | BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE AN ATTIC." |
| | |
| | ARCHITECT AND MEP ENGINEER NEED TO COORDINATE PLANS AND |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND DELAYS |
| | AND AVOID THE PLAN REVIEW FEE PER FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | 553.80(2)(B). |
| | CROSS SECTIONS AND DETAILS SHOWN ON REVISED SHEET |
| | A1-4.2 SHOW ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION ON THE ROOF THERMAL |
| | ENVELOPE (BELOW ROOF SHEATHING) FOR EXISTING PITCHED |
| | ROOF. ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION IS TYPICALLY USED WHEN |
| | THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS DESIGNING AN UNVENTED ATTIC. |
| | IF SPECIFYING UNVENTED ATTIC THEN CLARIFY WHY |
| | SPECIFYING ROOF ATTIC VENTILATION ON PROPOSED ROOF PLAN |
| | ON SHEET A1-4.4?. SEE SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR |
| | VENTED AND UNVENTED ATTICS INFORMATION AND REVISE PLANS |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | FLAT ROOF IS OK AS AN UNVENTED ATTIC WITH THE ICYNENE |
| | R-30 INSULATION. |
| | |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE REVISED TO REFLECT THE |
| | CORRECT INFORMATION. FIRST, NEED TO COORDINATE WITH |
| | ARCHITECT IF EXISTING ROOF IS GOING TO BE VENTED OR NOT |
| | AND NEED TO ADD THE UNVENTED FLAT ROOF AREAS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 10- ROOF WITH LESS THAN 6" EAVES REQUIRES GUTTERS WITH |
| | DOWNSPOUTS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R318.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SPECIFY GUTTERS ON PLANS. PROVIDE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING TERMINATION OF DOWNSPOUTS. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | REVISE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN (SHEET A1-4.1). THERE IS A |
| | FLAT ROOF (REAR AND FRONT AREAS). NEED TO SPECIFY |
| | SCUPPERS AT THE PERIMETER OF THE ROOF WHERE THE EAVE IS |
| | LESS THAN 6". THE ONLY EXCEPTION WHERE GUTTER IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED IS FOR GABLE ROOFS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A1-4.4 ONLY SHOWS GUTTERS ON |
| | TWO SIDES OF THE REAR FLAT ROOF. NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | GUTTERS AT THE PERIMETER OF THE FLAT ROOF WHERE THE |
| | EAVE IS LESS THAN 6" AS REQUESTED ON THE PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT. THE ONLY EXCEPTION WHERE GUTTER IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED IS FOR GABLE ROOFS. |
| | NOTE: IF THE NEW FLAT ROOF ON THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE |
| | HAS AN EAVE OF LESS THAN 6" ON THE WEST SIDE, THEN NEED |
| | TO PROVIDE GUTTERS AS WELL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 12- DESIGNER OF RECORD OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF |
| | VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SPECIFY VENT SIZE AND LOCATION. |
| | NOTE: THERE ARE FLAT AND PITCHED ROOFS. IF DESIGNING |
| | UNVENTED ATTICS, THEN SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH SEC. |
| | R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES: "PLEASE SEE REVISED SHEET |
| | A1-4.1 INDICATING ROOF PITCH". |
| | THIS IS INCORRECT. THE REQUEST WAS TO SPECIFY ROOF |
| | VENTILATION NOT ROOF PITCH. READ SEC. R806 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION |
| | FOR CROSS VENTILATION FOR ALL ROOF AREAS. (SEE NOTE ON |
| | ITEM #12 ABOVE. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH ITEM #9 ABOVE). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE RESPONSE TO COMMENT #9 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 13- DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS (NOTE: |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW AFTER PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE BUT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL: |
| | A)FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | B)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | C)HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS. |
| | D)FIXED WINDOWS. |
| | E) REAR SWING DOOR. |
| | F)SLIDING GLASS DOOR. |
| | G) NEW GABLE END VENT SHOWN ON EXTERIOR WEST ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 14- ADDITIONAL DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PROVIDE ICC |
| | EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE ICYNENE R-30 INSULATION TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 17- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)CEILING INFORMATION NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH ITEM |
| | #9 ABOVE. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE THERMAL ENVELOPE AND |
| | SPECIFY IF DESIGNING VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTICS. NOTE: |
| | THERE ARE SOME FLAT ROOFS IN THIS PROJECT THAT NEED TO |
| | BE CONSIDERED ALSO. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD IS SPECIFYING ICYNENE ATTIC INSULATION. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE ARCHITECT IS DESIGNING UNVENTED ATTICS. ITEM |
| | #11(B) SPECIFIES A VENTED ATTIC. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | MATCH PLANS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #9 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE RESPONSE TO COMMENT #9 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
