| Plan Review Notes For Permit 22050876 |
| Permit Number |
22050876 |
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
| Sequence Number |
2 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-01 13:27:59 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT | | | PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY (21120302) MUST BE APPROVED | | | PRIOR TO THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. THE PLANS ON THIS | | | ELECTRIC PERMIT AND THE ONES ULTIMATELY RESUBMITTED | | | WITH THE WCF ROW PERMIT NEED TO MATCH. THE COMMENTS | | | BELOW MIRROR THOSE PROVIDED WITH THE WCF ROW REVIEW. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE LOCATION OF THE HANDHOLE AND THE | | | INSTALL EXCAVATION SHOWN ADJACENT TO THE POLE SUPPLYING | | | POWER WILL DAMAGE THE ROOT SYSTEM OF THE EXISTING LARGE | | | STREET TREE IF INSTALLED IN THE LOCATION SHOWN ON SHEET | | | P-1. THE HANDHOLE MAY NOT BE INSTALLED AT THIS | | | LOCATION. *** THE EXCAVATION PIT CONTINUES TO BE SHOWN | | | LESS THEN 5 FEET FROM THE TREE, WHICH IS TOO CLOSE. IT | | | NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 10 FEET AWAY, ESPECIALLY GIVEN THE | | | SIZE OF THE TREE, IF THE HANDHOLE WILL BE LOCATED | | | WITHIN THE GRASS AREA. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE HANDHOLE | | | BE INSTALLED UNDER THE SIDEWALK SO THAT IT, AND THE | | | EXCAVATION, ARE FURTHER AWAY FROM THE TREE AND IN AN | | | AREA THAT TYPICALLY SEES LESS ROOT ZONE EXPANSION. | | | | | | 3) THE POLE STYLE AND HEIGHT MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. | | | THE POLE COLOR AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE RAL/RAYCAP | | | 7042 TRAFFIC GREY A. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
