| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-04 15:56:02 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22050716 |
| | 1222 ALPHA ST |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 1- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | |
| | A)OK. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM. OWNER'S NAME IS INCORRECT. NEED BUILDER'S NAME, |
| | PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION (THIS IS 604700 |
| | JURISDICTION). SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | MISSING THE PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION NUMBER |
| | (604700). ALSO, CORRECT ZIP CODE IS 33401 NOT 33304. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C)OK. |
| | D)OK. |
| | E)OK. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | F)CEILING INSULATION SPECIFIED ON ITEM #11 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, THE CEILING OF |
| | THIS STRUCTURE IS NOT FLAT. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS ITEM HAS TO BE COORDINATED WITH ITEM #2 BELOW. |
| | PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | G)ITEM #11 SPECIFY VENTED CEILING. PROVIDE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE CROSS VENTILATION IS |
| | PROVIDED. PLANS DON'T SHOW THIS. ROOF NEEDS CROSS |
| | VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | R-19 BATT INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON 2X6 ROOF JOISTS. IT |
| | DOESN'T ALLOW ROOF CROSS VENTILATION. SEC. R806.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS STILL SHOW VENTED ATTIC. PLANS |
| | DON'T SHOW ANY ATTIC CROSS VENTILATION. COORDINATE WITH |
| | ITEM # 2 BELOW. |
| | |
| | H)OK. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | I)PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON DOING THE CALCULATIONS |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | J)OK. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | K)ROOF TYPE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | L)OK. |
| | M)OK. |
| | N(OK. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | |
| | 2- IT IS NOT CLEAR IF ENGINEER OF RECORD IS DESIGNING A |
| | VENTED OR UNVENTED ATTIC. ENERGY CALCULATIONS SPECIFY |
| | VENTED ATTIC BUT PLANS DON'T SHOW VENT INFORMATION. |
| | ENGINEER TO READ SEC. R806 BC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | AND PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON PLANS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ATTIC CROSS VENTILATION SEC. R806.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL OR ENGINEER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INFORMATION ON PLANS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH UNVENTED |
| | ATTIC SEC. R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ENGINEER TO SPECIFY |
| | TYPE OF INSULATION AND R-VALUE. |
| | NOTE: IF USING BATT INSULATION, 2X6 ROOF RAFTERS DON'T |
| | HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO ALLOW INSULATION CLEARANCE FOR |
| | CROSS VENTILATION (SEE SEC. R806.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL). |
| | TYPICALLY SPRAY FOAM INSULATION (LIKE ICYNENE) IS USED |
| | FOR UNVENTED ATTICS. IF ENGINEER IS DESIGNING UNVENTED |
| | ATTIC THEN PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE |
| | ICYNENE INSULATION (OR ANY OTHER ONE SPECIFIED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL (NOTE: ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE |
| | THE REPORT IN WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS |
| | OFFICE). |
| | |
| | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE REVISED FOR WORST CASE |
| | SCENARIO. THIS IS NOT ALLOWED. ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED |
| | TO BE SITE SPECIFIC AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 (4) |
| | FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
