| Date |
Text |
| 2022-05-26 06:20:30 | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | THIS REVIEW IS BEING DONE UNDER BUILDING SO THE |
| | THRESHOLD REVIEW CAN BE FOCUSED ON THE SPECIAL |
| | INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. |
| | |
| | FS553.79(9)(D): |
| | |
| | (D)?ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE |
| | ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM |
| | BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY STANDARDS |
| | AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633. |
| | |
| | FOR 300 BANYAN, BLISSY & NYITRAY (STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS) |
| | HAS THIS STATEMENT ON THIS OFFICE HIGH RISE: |
| | |
| | TO THE BEST OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE |
| | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE |
| | MINIMUM BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | I UNDERSTAND THAT THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MAY OBJECT TO |
| | STATING COMPLIANCE WITH A CODE THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW |
| | (FS633), SO IT APPEARS THAT THIS WOULD BE REQUIRED OF |
| | THE ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | TO RESOLVE - FOR THE FOUNDATION PERMIT, PLEASE REVISE |
| | **ONE** PAGE TO INCLUDE THE THRESHOLD STATEMENT AND |
| | EMAIL TO ME. PLEASE DO NOT SELECT A PAGE THAT HAS BEEN |
| | STAMPED BY ANOTHER DISCIPLINE. THIS REVIEW WILL THEN BE |
| | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: |
| | |
| | ISSUED AT APPLICANT'S RISK |
| | A CURSORY REVIEW HAS BEEN DONE ON THE EXIT STRATEGY, |
| | REMOTENESS OF EXITS |
| | NO REVIEW WAS DONE OF THE DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE AND |
| | PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS. REDUCED OPENINGS OR FIRE RATED |
| | OPENINGS MAY BE REQUIRED UPON A THOROUGH BUILDING |
| | REVIEW |
| | PROVISO: WHEN RESUBMITTING OR SUBMITTING ANY PAGES, |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE THE THRESHOLD STATEMENT AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
