| Date |
Text |
| 2022-06-08 16:31:17 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF THE EXIT DOORS FROM THE |
| | AMENITY DECK SWINGING OUT AGAINST THE PATH OF EXIT |
| | TRAVEL |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101 CH 12 & CH 7 |
| | |
| | 12.2.2.2 DOORS. |
| | 12.2.2.2.1 DOORS COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1 SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.4.2* DOOR LEAF SWING DIRECTION. DOOR LEAVES |
| | REQUIRED TO BE OF |
| | THE SIDE-HINGED OR PIVOTED-SWINGING TYPE SHALL SWING IN |
| | THE DIRECTION |
| | OF EGRESS TRAVEL UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: |
| | (1) WHERE SERVING A ROOM OR AREA WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | OF 50 OR MORE, |
| | EXCEPT UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: |
| | (A) DOOR LEAVES IN HORIZONTAL EXITS SHALL NOT BE |
| | REQUIRED TO SWING |
| | IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL WHERE PERMITTED BY |
| | 7.2.4.3.8.1 |
| | OR 7.2.4.3.8.2. |
| | (B) DOOR LEAVES IN SMOKE BARRIERS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | TO SWING |
| | IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL IN EXISTING HEALTH |
| | CARE OCCUPAN CIES, AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 19. |
| | (2) WHERE THE DOOR ASSEMBLY IS USED IN AN EXIT |
| | ENCLOSURE, UNLESS THE |
| | DOOR OPENING SERVES AN INDIVIDUAL LIVING UNIT THAT |
| | OPENS DIRECTLY |
| | INTO AN EXIT ENCLOSURE |
| | (3) WHERE THE DOOR OPENING SERVES A HIGH-HAZARD |
| | CONTENTS AREA |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1A) THE DOOR HARDWARE OF THE EXIT DOORS FROM THE |
| | AMENNITY DECK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101 CH 12 & 7 |
| | |
| | 12.2.2.2.3 ANY DOOR IN A REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS FROM |
| | AN AREA HAVING |
| | AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR MORE PERSONS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE PRO VIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK ONLY IF |
| | THE LATCH OR LOCK IS PANIC HARDWARE OR |
| | FIRE EXIT HARDWARE COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.7, UNLESS |
| | OTHERWISE PERMITTED |
| | BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO DELAYED-EGRESS |
| | ELECTRICAL LOCK ING SYSTEMS AS PERMITTED IN 12.2.2.2.5. |
| | (2) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO SENSOR-RELEASE |
| | OF ELECTRICAL |
| | LOCKING SYSTEMS AS PERMITTED IN 12.2.2.2.6. |
| | 12.2.2.2.4 LOCKING DEVICES COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.5.5 |
| | SHALL BE PERMITTED |
| | TO BE USED ON A SINGLE DOOR OR A SINGLE PAIR OF DOORS |
| | IF BOTH OF THE FOL LOWING CONDITIONS APPLY: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OR PAIR OF DOORS SERVE AS THE MAIN EXIT |
| | AND THE ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANCY HAS AN OCCUPANT LOAD NOT GREATER THAN 500. |
| | (2) ANY LATCHING DEVICES ON SUCH A DOOR(S) FROM AN |
| | ASSEMBLY OCCU PANCY HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR |
| | MORE ARE RELEASED BY |
| | PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.7* PANIC HARDWARE AND FIRE EXIT HARDWARE |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.7.1 WHERE A SIDE-HINGED OR PIVOTED-SWINGING DOOR |
| | ASSEMBLY IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE EQUIPPED WITH PANIC OR FIRE EXIT |
| | HARDWARE, SUCH HARDWARE |
| | SHALL MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: |
| | (1) IT SHALL CONSIST OF A CROSS BAR OR A PUSH PAD, WITH |
| | THE LENGTH OF THE |
| | ACTUATING PORTION OF THE CROSS BAR OR PUSH PAD NOT LESS |
| | THAN ONE-HALF |
| | OF THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR LEAF. |
| | (2) IT SHALL BE MOUNTED AS FOLLOWS: |
| | (A) NEW INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 34 IN. |
| | (865 MM), AND |
| | NOT MORE THAN 48 IN. (1220 MM), ABOVE THE FLOOR. |
| | (B) EXISTING INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 30 |
| | IN. (760 MM), |
| | AND NOT MORE THAN 48 IN. (1220 MM), ABOVE THE FLOOR. |
| | (3) IT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO THAT A HORIZONTAL FORCE |
| | NOT TO EXCEED 15 LBF |
| | (66 N) ACTUATES THE CROSS BAR OR PUSH PAD AND LATCHES |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT |
| | |
| | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
