| Plan Review Notes For Permit 22040649 |
| Permit Number |
22040649 |
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2022-05-24 13:59:09 | 5/25/22 NEW PLAN WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE NOW IN FILE.MP | | | | | | SIGNATURE REVIEW FAILED | | | | | | IT APPEARS THE DRAWING SUBMITTED IS NOT SEALED AND | | | SIGNED AS REQUIRED. | | | PLANS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY MUST BE DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT OF RECORD. | | | PLEASE FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS OUTLINED BELOW TO CORRECT | | | THIS ISSUE. | | | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR | | | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE | | | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND | | | SIGNED. | | | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN | | | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF | | | APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, | | | OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER | | | ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING | | | DEPARTMENT. | | | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN | | | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RESUBMITTAL FORM. | | | | | | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO | | | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED | | | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. | | | PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO | | | [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS | | | MICHAEL PETERSON | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
