| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-07 15:04:27 | NEW SFR |
| | REVIEWED BY ROGER MCPHERSON |
| | 561-805-6716 |
| | [email protected] |
| | CODE USED FOR REVIEW - 2020 FBC WITH WPB CHAPTER 1 |
| | AMENDMENT |
| | |
| | CORRECTIONS NEEDED - |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE THE FRONT PAGES OF THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FL10765, FL11002, FL18655, FL21061, |
| | FL21195, FL5259, FL15279, FL6332 AND FL17908. FRONT |
| | PAGES ARE NEEDED TO DETERMINE IF THE PRODUCT IS |
| | APPROVED BY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 2) DOOR AND WINDOW OPENING WIND PRESSURES SHOULD BE |
| | SHOWN - WHEN USING THE WIND DESIGN PRESSURES IN FBC |
| | TABLER301.2(2) - SOME OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | WINDOWS AND DOORS IN WIND ZONE 5 MAY NOT MEET THE |
| | REQUIRED WIND PRESSURES - PLEASE AT LEAST SHOW BUILDING |
| | WIND ZONE 5 LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE DRAWINGS PROVIDED FOR THE OVERHEAD DOOR PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL15279 ARE FOR A 16' WIDE DOOR (DRAWINGS SHOW |
| | DOOR TO BE 18' WIDE) AND DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED WIND |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES PER FBC TABLER301.2(2) |
| | |
| | 4) THE DRAWINGS PROVIDED FOR PRODUCT APPROVAL FL11002 - |
| | CASEMENT WINDOWS DO NOT MEET IMPACT REQUIREMENTS - |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 5) CANNOT FIND PRODUCT APPROVAL FL20107 FOR THE |
| | NANAWALL DOOR IN PROJECTDOX - AS LISTED ON THE DRAWINGS |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 6) DRAWING A403 SAYS TO SEE CUT SECTION A-502 - DRAWING |
| | A-502 IS NOT IN PROJECTDOX. |
| | |
| | 7) DRAWING A-403 SHOWS A GUARD HEIGHT OF 2'10" (PLEASE |
| | SHOW GUARD HEIGHT TO COMPLY WITH FBC R312.1.2) - |
| | DRAWING A-401 SHOWS AN ADDED RAILING WITH A HEIGHT OF |
| | 3' FOR THE GUARD HEIGHT (PLEASE SHOW ALL GUARD RAIL |
| | HEIGHTS) |
| | |
| | 8) PROPOSED ELEVATION OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT |
| | SERVICING THE BUILDING SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS |
| | FBC R322.1.6 |
| | |
| | 9) ELEVATION CERTIFICATE - DOES NOT SHOW AS |
| | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED. |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX NEED TO BE |
| | DIGITALLY/ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED TO BE USED IN |
| | ELECTRONIC PLAN REVIEW. (A CERTIFICATE-BASED DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURE (OFTEN JUST CALLED A DIGITAL SIGNATURE) IS A |
| | SPECIFIC TYPE OF E-SIGNATURE). |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
