| Date |
Text |
| 2022-06-07 07:13:33 | THIS REVIEW WAS ADDED TO PROVIDE FURTHER CLARIFICATION |
| | FOR THE PRIVATE PROVIDER PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 22030685 (MASTER) - SHEET IA-310 PREPARED BY DIEGO |
| | ROBERTO MARTINEZ ([email protected]), AR99036. THE |
| | PLAN SUBMITTED IS DATED 11/23/21. |
| | |
| | THE PAGE SUBMITTED FOR 22040335 HAS A DIFFERENT DATE, |
| | CLIENT REVISIONS 12/7/2021, IS OF POOR QUALITY (APPEARS |
| | TO BE A SCAN), AND IS NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. BECAUSE THE |
| | PAGE SUBMITTED IS A SCAN RATHER THAN A PDF FROM THE |
| | ARCHITECT'S OFFICE, WE CANNOT EASILY DETERMINE CTHE |
| | CHANGS TO SEE IF A REVISION SHOULD BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | TWO PAGES WERE UPLOADED, ONE WAS THE POOR QUALITY |
| | REVISED PLAN, THE SECOND PAGE IS THE SAME PAGE FROM THE |
| | ISSUED PERMIT, VERSION 11/23/21. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY |
| | THAT WAS SUBMITTED, PLEASE EMAIL |
| | [email protected] AND REQUEST THAT IT BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | THE AFFIDAVIT IS NOT CORRECT FOR THE PAGE SUBMITTED, |
| | REFERS TO WRONG VERSION. |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT A REVISION IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | THE AFFIDAVIT FOR THE MASTER WAS EVALUATED ONLY FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE AFFIDAVIT AND THE PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED. HOWEVER IN REEVALUATION, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY |
| | AN ELECTRICAL PAGE WOULD APPEAR ON THE BUILDING |
| | REVIEWER'S AFFIDAVIT. SHEET IA-310 IS LOW VOLTAGE AND |
| | ELECTRICAL, NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF A BUILDING PLANS |
| | EXAMINER LICENSE. |
| | |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
