| Date |
Text |
| 2022-11-02 17:22:38 | RESIDENTIAL (R3)ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22031580 |
| | 849 ARDMORE RD |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- DRAWINGS WERE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT |
| | AND ENGINEERS OF RECORD. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 481 F.S. AND CHAPTER |
| | 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC |
| | RECORDS. |
| | NOTE: SUBMIT DRAWINGS ELECTRONICALLY WITH VERIFIABLE |
| | DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NEED DRAWINGS WITH VERIFIABLE DIGITAL SIGNATURE. SEE |
| | SIGNATURE REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS |
| | 61G1-16.005 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND |
| | SEALING AND FOR ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTING PLANS, |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | ENGINEERS |
| | 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND |
| | SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2- OK. |
| | 3- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ON SHEET A103 SHOWS PROPOSED |
| | BEDROOM #1 WITH A CEILING HEIGHT OF 6'8". THIS ROOM |
| | DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM CEILING HEIGHT OF 7'-0" |
| | REQUIRED FOR HABITABLE ROOMS. THEREFORE, THIS ROOM |
| | CANNOT BE USED AS A HABITABLE ROOM. SEC. R305.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CEILING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ON SHEET A103 ARE NOT CLEAR. |
| | A CEILING HEIGHT IS TAKEN FROM FINISH FLOOR TO CEILING. |
| | CEILING HEIGHT AT HEADER AND CEILING HEIGHT AT HEAD |
| | HEIGHT DON'T SPECIFY THE ACTUAL CEILING HEIGHT OF THE |
| | ROOM. BASED ON DRAWING SUBMITTED AND PICTURES ON THE |
| | WEBSITE WHEN THE HOUSE WAS FOR SALE, THIS IS A |
| | CONTINUOUS CEILING. BASED ON THE PICTURES, IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE SLOPED CEILING IS TOO SLOW TO BE CONSIDERED A |
| | HABITABLE ROOM. ONLY THE AREAS COMPLYING WITH THE |
| | MINIMUM CEILING HEIGHT AND HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS ARE |
| | CONSIDERED FOR THE ROOM TO BE CONSIDERED AS BEDROOM. |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE CROSS SECTION OF THIS BEDROOM WITH |
| | DIMENSIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM AREAS OF |
| | SEC. R304.1, SEC. R304.2 AND R304.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- NONE OF THE WINDOWS OF PROPOSED BEDROOM #1 COMPLY |
| | WITH THE BEDROOMS EMERGENCY ESCAPE SEC. R310.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL (NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #4 ABOVE). |
| | ALSO, SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING WINDOWS TO BE |
| | REPLACED ON PROPOSED BEDROOM #2 AND TYPE AND SIZE OF |
| | PROPOSED WINDOWS TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOW W5 (4'-2" X 5'-0") DOESN'T SEEM TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM CLEAR HEIGHT OPENING |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. |
| | NOTE: TYPICALLY, 63" HIGH SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS ARE THE |
| | ONES THAT PROVIDE THE 24" CLEAR HEIGHT OPENING. VERIFY |
| | WITH MANUFACTURER. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- SHEET S1: SPECIFY PROTECTION AGAINST WOOD DECAY FOR |
| | THE FLOOR JOISTS OF THE COVERED DECK AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R37 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY DONE. ENGINEER IS SPECIFYING PRESSURE TREATED |
| | WOOD JOISTS FOR PERIMETER BEAMS BUT THERE ARE NO |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INTERIOR FLOOR JOISTS OF THE |
| | DECK. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET S3: |
| | A) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES ARE TOO LOW |
| | BASED ON SPECIFIED BUILDING EXPOSURE AND HEIGHT, DOORS |
| | AND WINDOWS ARE LOW. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE |
| | ACTUAL CALCULATIONS. |
| | SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET S1 ARE TOO LOW FOR |
| | WINDOWS LOCATED IN THE END ZONE. ENGINEER TO REVIEW |
| | REVISED DRAWING A102 FOR CORRECT WINDOW SIZES. ALSO, |
| | THE HEIGHT FOR THIS BUILDING IS NOT 10 FEET. SEE |
| | ELEVATIONS AND REVISE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: THERE ARE THREE WINDOWS IN THE BAY AREA OF |
| | BEDROOM #1, NOT JUST ONE WINDOW. |
| | |
| | 8- OK. |
| | 9- OK. |
| | 10-OK. |
| | 11-OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 12- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)INSWING ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT DRAWING A102 |
| | WAS REVISED TO SHOW OUTSWING DOOR. DRAWING A102 WAS NOT |
| | REVISED. CLARIFY IF USING SAME NOA 19-0918.03 FOR ENTRY |
| | DOOR AND COVERED DECK DOORS. |
| | |
| | B)FRENCH DOORS. |
| | RESPONSE: OK IF USING SAME NOA 19-0918.03. |
| | |
| | C)OK. |
| | D)OK. |
| | |
| | E)WINDOW MULLIONS (NOTE: NEED TO SPECIFY MULLION SIZE |
| | TO VERIFY PRESSURES. SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL). |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | MULLION SIZE WAS NOT SPECIFIED AND NOA 20-1118.13 |
| | SUBMITTED DOESN'T SHOW MULLION FOR BAY WINDOWS ON |
| | BEDROOM #1. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CORNER |
| | MULLIONS OR PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL MULLION |
| | DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BAY WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | F)OK. |
| | G)OK. |
| | |
| | H) FLAT ROOF. AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOA 18-0919.12 DOESN'T SPECIFY WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| | IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED AND NEED TO PROVIDE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA. |
| | NOTE: ASSEMBLIES WITH GENERAL LIMITATION #9 CANNOT BE |
| | USED. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #9 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA. |
| | |
| | NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED: |
| | I) HORIZONTAL SLIDER WINDOW SPECIFIED ON REVISED PLANS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 13- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS NOT REVIEWED/APPROVED. |
| | |
| | B)GUARDRAIL ICC EVALUATION REPORT ESR-4945 SUBMITTED |
| | WAS NOT REVIEWED/APPROVED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 14- HANDRAILS AND HANDRAILS: DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS |
| | TO PROVIDE THE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5, SEC. R311.7.8 AND SEC. R312.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: SUBSEQUENT SHOP DRAWINGS ARE TO CONFIRM THAT |
| | DESIGN DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE MET. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THE FIBERON INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS SUBMITTED DON'T |
| | CORRESPOND TO FIBERON ICC EVALUATION REPORT ESR-4945 |
| | SUBMITTED. THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT RAILINGS SYSTEMS. |
| | SUBMIT ONLY THE ICC EVALUATION REPORT AND DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD TO REVIEW/APPROVE IT. |
| | |
| | 15-OK. |
| | 16-OK. |
| | |
| | 17- HARD COPY OF STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED HAVE |
| | A COPY OF THE ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE. DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE PRINTED. ALL DOCUMENTS |
| | PREPARED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER NEED TO HAVE THE |
| | ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.004 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 |
| | F.S. |
| | NOTE: SUBMIT CALCULATIONS ELECTRONICALLY WITH DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURE |
| | |
| | ENGINEERS |
| | 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND |
| | SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
