| Date |
Text |
| 2022-06-06 09:20:07 | CLIENT EMAILED PLANS WITH CORRECT SIGNATURE. I UPLOADED |
| | THEM TO SIGNATURE FILE 6/6/22. MP |
| 2022-06-03 10:17:49 | SIGNATURE REVIEW FAILED |
| | 1) PLANS TITELED PLAN EXIST, PLAN PROPOSED AND HVAC |
| | APPEAR TO BE COPIES OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES OR DO NOT |
| | HAVE THE REQUIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS OUTLINED BELOW TO CORRECT |
| | THIS ISSUE.FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN |
| | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD |
| | ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY |
| | SEALED AND SIGNED. |
| | |
| | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN |
| | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF |
| | APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, |
| | OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER |
| | ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING |
| | DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RESUBMITTAL FORM. |
| | |
| | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO |
| | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. |
| | PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO |
| | [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS |
| | |
| | MICHAEL PETERSON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6746 |
| | |
| 2022-05-26 11:12:40 | DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON THE MECHANICAL DRAWING IS A COPY |
| | OF THE ORIGINAL DIGITAL SIGNATURE. PROVIDE THE |
| | ORIGIANAL DIGITALLY SIGNED DRAWING. ME |