| Date |
Text |
| 2022-05-26 09:49:23 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22020140 |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1-LOT DRAINAGE |
| | PROPOSED WORK AFFECTS THE LOT DRAINAGE. PROVIDE |
| | DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING HOW THE SURFACE DRAINAGE IS KEPT |
| | WITHIN THE LOT AND NOT DIVERTED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING SECTIONS: R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. |
| | 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS AND SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NO DRAINAGE PLAN WITH GRADE ELEVATIONS WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 2- OK. |
| | 3- OK. |
| | 4- OK. |
| | 5- OK. |
| | 6- OK. |
| | 7- OK. |
| | 8- OK. |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)OK. |
| | B)OK. |
| | C)OK. |
| | D)OK |
| | |
| | E)FRENCH DOOR NOA SUBMITTED IS FOR NON-IMPACT DOORS. |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE GLAZING IMPACT PROTECTION AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R301.2.1.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHUTTERS TO BE |
| | USED. ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE SHUTTERS COMPLETE |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED BY CITY |
| | IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD FOR WIND-BORNE DEBRIS IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION FOR THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. SEE CITY |
| | SAMPLE. ALL THE COLUMNS NEED TO BE COMPLETED. |
| | ALTERNATIVELY, YOU MAY PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE IN ANY OTHER FORMAT AS LONG AS ALL THE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: ANOTHER DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED (FL |
| | 17347-R4). CLARIFY WHERE IS THIS DOOR GOING TO BE |
| | INSTALLED? |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: ENGINEER OF RECORD SUBMITTED A LETTER WITH A |
| | GENERAL STATEMENT STATING "I HAVE REVIEWED THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR DOORS, WINDOWS AND ROOFING. THEY ARE |
| | ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT." |
| | THIS LETTER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THIS LETTER IS TOO |
| | GENERAL AND DOESN'T IDENTIFY WHICH SPECIFIC PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED. ENGINEER TO EITHER |
| | PROVIDE APPROVAL STAMP OR IN WRITING ON THE FRONT PAGE |
| | OF EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL OR CLEARLY IDENTIFY EACH |
| | PRODUCT WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER AND SPECIFIC |
| | MODEL. |
| | |
| | 11- OK. |
| | 12- OK. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
