| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-01 11:03:49 | NEW DUPLEX (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22011186 |
| | 910 4TH ST |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 2-EGRESS WINDOW DISCUSSED WITH ROBERT BROWN, BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL. SINCE THIS IS NEW CONSTRUCTION AND THE |
| | SPECIFIED WINDOW SIZE IS SMALLER THAN TYPICAL EGRESS |
| | SIZE AND THE ARCHITECT'S SPECIFIED WINDOW IS BASED ON |
| | SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER AND SPECIFIC SIZE WITH AN |
| | ADDITIONAL CONDITION TO MEET THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS, |
| | THEN BUILDING OFFICIAL REQUIRES ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO |
| | SPECIFY ON PLANS HOW THE SPECIFIED WINDOW MEETS THE |
| | EGRESS REQUIREMENT. THIS IS REQUIRED IN ORDER FOR |
| | INSPECTOR TO VERIFY THIS CONDITION IN THE FIELD. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. ARCHITECT DOESN'T |
| | SPECIFY ON PLANS ON PLANS THE SPECIAL CONDITION |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE EGRESS WINDOW TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| | EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS |
| | REQUESTED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 16-DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL BE |
| | SUBMITTED AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED: |
| | A)ENTRY WOOD DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | B)WOOD FRENCH DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| | D)WINDOW MULLIONS (NOTE: NEED TO SPECIFY MULLION SIZE |
| | TO VERIFY PRESSURES. SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL). |
| | E)HURRICANE SHUTTERS IF DOORS AND WINDOWS DON'T HAVE |
| | IMPACT GLAZING. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE CITY SAMPLE. |
| | E)SHINGLES. |
| | |
| | 18- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | G)BUILDER TO SIGN AND COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
| | LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED CALCULATIONS |
| | H)ITEM #2 WAS CORRECT BUT IT WAS REVISED AND NOW IS |
| | INCORRECT. IT IS MULTIPLE FAMILY. REVISE AGAIN AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | I)ITEM #3 WAS CORRECT BUT IT WAS REVISED AND NOW IS |
| | INCORRECT. IT IS 2 UNITS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF WHERE AND |
| | HOW THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE |
| | REVIEW PROCESS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
