| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-10 15:36:36 | RESIDENTIAL(R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22010709 |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1-PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1106 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R101.5 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE FORM IS PROPERLY SIGNED BY ALL |
| | REQUIRED PARTIES AND IS COORDINATED WITH PLANS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | A)REPEAT COMMENT. FORM R402-2020 WAS NOT SIGNED AT THE |
| | OWNER/AGENT BOTTOM LINE AS REQUESTED. ALSO, IF ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD IS SIGNING THE FORM, THEN HE NEEDS TO PROVIDE |
| | HIS SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 WHEN |
| | SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE TO PROVIDE HARD COPY WITH |
| | ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SEAL/SIGNATURE OR SUBMIT FORM |
| | ELECTRONICALLY WITH ENGINEER'S VERIFIABLE DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURE TO AVOID MORE DELAYS. |
| | |
| | B) INSTALLED CEILING R-VALUE WAS ON PAGE 1 UNDER |
| | "INSULATION AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS BY COMPONENT" |
| | CHANGED TO R-38. THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH |
| | INFORMATION GIVEN IN THE PLANS PREPARED BY THE SAME |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | ENGINEER TO COORDINATE INFORMATION TO AVOID MORE |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C)INSTALLED WOOD FRAME WALL R-VALUE ON PAGE 1 UNDER |
| | "INSULATION AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS BY COMPONENT" |
| | IS INCORRECT. THE PROPOSED ADDITION IS NOT WOOD FRAME. |
| | THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION GIVEN IN THE |
| | PLANS PREPARED BY THE SAME ENGINEER OF RECORD PREPARING |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE |
| | INFORMATION TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)INSTALLED MASONRY WALL R-VALUE ON PAGE 1 UNDER |
| | "INSULATION AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS BY COMPONENT" |
| | WAS CHANGED TO THE R-VALUE REQUIRED FOR CLIMATE ZONE 2. |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CLARIFY WHY USING THIS VALUE AND |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PLANS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE REVISED VALUE. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE INFORMATION |
| | TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.1 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E)INSTALLED FLOOR R-VALUE ON PAGE 1 UNDER "INSULATION |
| | AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS BY COMPONENT" WAS CHANGED |
| | FROM N/A TO 13. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CLARIFY WHY USING |
| | THIS VALUE AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PLANS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE REVISED VALUE. ENGINEER TO |
| | COORDINATE INFORMATION TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | F)ENGINEER OF RECORD SPECIFIED A WATER HEATER UNDER THE |
| | INSTALLED EFFICIENCY LEVEL COLUMN ON PAGE 2, BUT ON |
| | MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS ON PAGE 3 THE ENGINEER CHANGED |
| | THE CHECKED MARK TO N/A. ENGINEER TO CLARIFY REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE INFORMATION |
| | TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.1 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- FOUNDATION PLAN DOESN'T SPECIFY FOOTING SIZE. |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD NEEDS TO PROVIDE FOOTING DETAIL AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R401.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | FOOTING TYPE AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON FOUNDATION |
| | PLAN LAYOUT 1/S3 AND FOOTING TYPE AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWN ON BATHROOM TYPICAL WALL SECTION 2/S3 DON'T |
| | MATCH. ENGINEER TO COORDINATE INFORMATION TO AVOID MORE |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- ROOF FRAMING PLAN DETAIL 2/S3 AND HOUSE BATH SOUTH |
| | SIDE VIEW DETAIL 5/S4 ARE INCOMPLETE. ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR HAND FRAMED ROOF SYSTEM. SPECIFY TOP RAFTERS |
| | SPACING AND STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS, CONNECTION TO 2X8 |
| | RIDGE, 2X4 OUTRIGGERS SPACING AND CONNECTORS. NEED TO |
| | SPECIFY BOTTOM CHORD OF HAND FRAMED ROOF SYSTEM AND |
| | STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS AT EACH END. NEED TO SPECIFY |
| | FRAMING AND CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING ROOF. |
| | SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | ROOF FRAMING IS NOT CLEAR. SPECIFIED STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTORS DON'T SEEM TO BE THE PROPER CONNECTORS FOR |
| | THE PROPOSED CONNECTION. ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ACTUAL |
| | DETAIL SHOWING HOW THE CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON DETAIL |
| | 2/S2 ARE INSTALLED. SHOW HOW THE 2"X4" BOTTOM CHORD IS |
| | CONNECTED WITH THE META16 SIMPSON CONNECTOR IF THIS |
| | CONNECTOR HAS A 12" METAL STRAP. ALSO, HOW IS THE 2"X4" |
| | BOTTOM CORD ATTACHED TO THE 2"X6" RAFTER WITH A H2.5A |
| | SIMPSON CONNECTOR. HOW IS THE 2"X4" COLLAR BEAM |
| | ATTACHED TO THE 2"X6". HOW ARE THE OUTRIGGERS CONNECTED |
| | TO THE 2"X6" RAFTERS. HOW ARE THE 2"X6" RAFTERS |
| | CONNECTED TO THE 2"X6" RIDGE BOARD IF THE SPECIFIED |
| | HANGER IS HAS A HEIGHT GREATER THAN THE RIDGE BOARD. |
| | ETC. HOW IS THE GABLE END BRACED. ETC. SEC. 107.2.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: ENGINEER NEEDS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CLEAR ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN. COORDINATE ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND |
| | CONNECTORS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- PROVIDE COMPLETE GABLE END CONSTRUCTION. IS MASONRY |
| | OR WOOD FRAMED. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R601.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. |
| | R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. COMPLETE GABLE END DETAIL IS NOT |
| | PROVIDED. THERE IS NOT DETAIL ON PAGE S3 AS SPECIFIED |
| | BY THE ENGINEER ON THE RESPONSE LETTER. PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE DETAIL SHOWING COMPLETE CONTINUOUS ATTACHMENT |
| | OF GABLE END FRAMING TO THE MASONRY WALL. ALSO, THERE |
| | IS NOT INFORMATION SHOWING HOW THE GABLE END IS BRACED |
| | TO RESIST THE LATERAL WIND LOADS. SEC. R301.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 5-OK. |
| | 6-OK. |
| | |
| | 7- TITLE SHEET: REVISE WIND LOAD SCHEDULE: |
| | A)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)REVISE ROOF AREAS TO MATCH CURRENT ASCE 7-16 AND |
| | FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL REVISED ROOF AREAS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. SEE FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | AND REVISE ROOF DIAGRAM AND ROOF AREAS. |
| | |
| | C)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D)THE "AREA OF COMPONENTS" NEEDS TO BE REVISED. |
| | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING LOADS ARE BASED ON THE |
| | EFFECTIVE WIND AREA. SEE FOOTNOTE "A" OF TABLE |
| | R301.2(2) FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. SEE TABLE R301.2(2)FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND |
| | TABLE R301.2(2)FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: CHECK ROOF TYPE AND PITCH. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- PROVIDE PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN OF EXISTING HOUSE |
| | IDENTIFYING ROOM WHERE PROPOSED ADDITION IS GOING TO BE |
| | BUILT. NEED TO VERIFY EGRESS COMPLIANCE IF THE ROOM IS |
| | A BEDROOM. SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD NEEDS TO SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | HOUSE BATHROOM ROOF FRAME DETAIL 1/S2 SPECIFIES "NEW |
| | OPENING FOR NEW WINDOW 36"X36" TO BE INSTALL". THIS |
| | ROOM IS A BEDROOM. THIS OPENING SIZE DOESN'T SEEM TO |
| | PROVIDE THE SIZE REQUIRED FOR AN EMERGENCY WINDOW SIZE |
| | TO COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH DETAIL 5/S1. |
| | |
| | 9- OK. |
| | 10- OK. |
| | 11- OK. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 12- ROOF NEEDS CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R806.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ENGINEER TO SPECIFY VENT SIZE |
| | AND SPACING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | DETAIL 4/S2 SHOWS CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENTILATION. THIS |
| | DETAIL CAN NOT BE APPLIED TO THIS PROJECT. ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN SHOWS A RIDGE BOARD. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ALSO, DETAIL 3/S2 SPECIFIES "4X16 SCREENED VENT 8'O.C. |
| | ON SELF FURRING METHAL LATH & 1"STUCCO". ENGINEER TO |
| | CLARIFY HOW INSTALLING VENTS AT 8' O.C. IF THE WALL IS |
| | ONLY 8' LONG AND HOW PROVIDING THE REQUIRED CROSS |
| | VENTILATION TO COMPLY. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 13-WIND RESISTANCE OF EXTERIOR SOFFITS: ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR THE SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R704 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | DETAIL 3/S2 AND DETAIL 2/S3 SPECIFY "SELF FURRING |
| | METHAL LATH & 1"STUCCO" FOR SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION. |
| | ENGINEER TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPE OF METAL |
| | PLASTER BASE FOR CEILINGS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE |
| | 3 OF ASTM C1063 OR ENGINEER TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | SHOWING HOW THE SPECIFIED SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION WILL |
| | PROVIDE WIND RESISTANCE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 14- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. DRAWINGS WITH ORIGINAL SEAL/SIGNATURE |
| | AND PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. |
| | ENGINEER TO REVIEW/APPROVED ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 15- OK. (ALUMINUM SOFFIT WAS DELETED) |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 16- REVISED PLANS DON'T SPECIFY ROOF SHEATHING. PROVIDE |
| | ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPECIFICATIONS TO COMPLY WITH |
| | NEW 2020 FBC-RESIDENTIAL SPECIFICATIONS. NEED NAIL |
| | TYPE, SIZE AND SPACING. NEED TO USE RING SHANK NAILS |
| | AND ROOF SHEATHING NEEDS TO BE NAILED AT 4 INCHES O.C. |
| | IN THE FIELD AND EDGES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 |
| | AND TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | REVISE DETAIL 3/S2, DETAIL 2/S3 AND DETAIL 7/S2. NEED |
| | TO SPECIFY NEEDS TO BE NAILED AT 4 INCHES O.C. IN THE |
| | FIELD AND EDGES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 AND |
| | TABLE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFY 5/8" ROOF SHEATHING AS REQUIRED |
| | BY TABLE R803.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 17- REVISED PLANS DON'T SPECIFY ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT. |
| | PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW COMPLYING WITH THE |
| | NEW 2020 CODE REQUIREMENT FOR ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT. |
| | SEC. R905.1.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY WHICH METHOD OF SEC. R905.1.1.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL IS GOING TO BE USED. AND PROVIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY F.A.C. 61G20-3.001 |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO 2ND REVISED SUBMITTAL: |
| | DETAIL 7/S2 SPECIFIES "UNDERLAYMENT GRACE ICE & WATER |
| | SHIELD" AND ALSO SPECIFIES "ASPHALT SHINGLES (2) LAYER |
| | OF 30# FELT IN TAGGED". CLEARLY SPECIFY WHICH |
| | UNDERLAYMENT IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | 18- HOUSE BATHROOM NORTH SIDE VIEW DETAIL 5/S2. |
| | ENGINEER TO CLARIFY WHAT ARE THE 4 LITTLE SQUARES SHOWN |
| | ON THE ELEVATION. ARE THESE GLASS BLOCKS?. IF SO |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND PROVIDE |
| | CORRESPONDING PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. FAC 61G20.3.001 |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
