| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-15 17:49:18 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION THIRD BUILDING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22010634 |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. |
| | ***IMPORTANT****CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION |
| | IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- LOT DRAINAGE: |
| | PROPOSED WORK AFFECTS THE LOT DRAINAGE. PROVIDE |
| | DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING HOW THE SURFACE DRAINAGE IS KEPT |
| | WITHIN THE LOT AND NOT DIVERTED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | AND SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: DRAINAGE PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | GRADE ELEVATIONS SHOWING HOW KEEPING WATER AWAY FROM |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. THREE TIMES. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3- OK. |
| | 4- OK. |
| | 5- OK. |
| | 6- OK. |
| | 7- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- WIND RESISTANCE OF EXTERIOR SOFFITS: ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR THE SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SEC. R704 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: TYPICAL WALL SECTION ONLY SPECIFIES STUCCO OVER |
| | PAPER BACKED METHAL LATHE. THERE ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS |
| | FOR WHAT KIND OF SHEATHING IS SUPPORTING THE METHAL |
| | LATH. ALSO, REVISE SIZE OF SPECIFIED FASCIA. SIZE |
| | SPECIFIED IS SMALLER THAN THE 2X10 JOISTS. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS RESPONSE: |
| | THERE IS NOT INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR SOFFIT |
| | CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH ASTM C1063. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO CURRENT SUBMITTAL: |
| | REVISED TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET FD-1 ONLY |
| | SPECIFIES "METAL LATHE" AS THE METAL BASE TO SUPPORT |
| | THE STUCCO. THIS METAL BASE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH TABLE 3 |
| | OF ASTM C1063 BASED ON THE CEILING RAFTERS SPACING. SEE |
| | TABLE 3 OF ASTM C1063 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 9- OK. |
| | |
| | 10-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) FLAT ROOF. NOTE: CLEARLY MARK WHICH APPROVED |
| | INSULATED ASSEMBLY AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS IS GOING TO BE |
| | INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. THREE TIMES. NO INFORMATION SUBMITTED. |
| | AND, NOT RESPONSE FROM CONTRACTOR IF SUBMITTING LATER A |
| | A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | B)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)FROSTED GLASS GARAGE DOOR AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES OF GARAGE DOOR ON FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL16545-R13 SUBMITTED DON'T MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT ON SHEET D-1. |
| | NEED TO RESUBMIT. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL OF GARAGE DOOR |
| | THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) INSWING ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. THREE TIMES. NO INFORMATION SUBMITTED. |
| | AND, NOT RESPONSE FROM CONTRACTOR IF SUBMITTING LATER |
| | AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | E)OK. |
| | |
| | F)NEW HORIZONTAL ROLLING WINDOW. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. THREE TIMES. REVISED PLANS SHOW 2 PANEL |
| | WINDOW SIZE 111"X58". NOA 20-0813.06 SUBMITTED DOESN'T |
| | COVER THIS SIZE FOR 2 PANEL WINDOW. REVISE AS REQUIRED |
| | OR PROVIDE ANOTHER PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | G)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS: CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: IF REPLACING WINDOWS IN EXISTING BEDROOMS, THEN |
| | SPECIFY SIZE AND TYPE OF EXISTING WINDOW AND SIZE AND |
| | TYPE OF PROPOSED WINDOW. |
| | |
| | 11-ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 12- PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE ICYNENE R-20 |
| | INSULATION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A) ICC EVALUATION REPORT ESR-2629 IS EXPIRED. THIS |
| | REPORT WAS SUBJECT TO RENEWAL ON 12/2019. NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE CURRENT REPORT. |
| | |
| | B) ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 13-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME, BUILDER'S NAME, PERMIT OFFICE |
| | AND JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION IS 604700). |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY DONE. STILL NEEDS OWNER'S NAME, BUILDER'S |
| | NAME. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)DESIGN LOCATION SPECIFIED ON PAGE 1 IS INCORRECT. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | D)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F)ITEM #5 ON PAGE 1 SPECIFIES WORST CASE SCENARIO. |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SITE SPECIFIC AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 (4) FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | G) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | H)WALL INSULATION R-VALUE SPECIFIED ON ITEM #10(A) FOR |
| | CONCRETE BLOCK WALL DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED INFORMATION IS INCORRECT AGAIN. COORDINATE WITH |
| | ARCHITECT. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | I)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | J)ITEM #16 ON PAGE 1 IS TAKING CREDIT FOR CEILING FANS |
| | AND WHOLE HOUSE FAN. PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY OF THIS. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION |
| | SHOWING HOW THE HOUSE IS COMPLYING WITH THESE CREDITS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED INFORMATION IS NOW IS TAKING CREDIT FOR CEILING |
| | FANS AND CROSS VENTILATION. PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY OF |
| | THIS. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INFORMATION SHOWING HOW THE HOUSE IS COMPLYING WITH |
| | THESE CREDITS. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT TO AVOID MORE |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | K)HOT WATER SYSTEM SPECIFIED ON PAGE 1 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. PLANS SHOW TANKLESS WATER |
| | HEATER. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | L)PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON DOING THE CALCULATIONS |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NO NAME PROVIDED. ONLY INITIALS WERE |
| | PROVIDED. NEED THE NAME OF THE PERSON DOING THE |
| | CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITED SECTION. |
| | |
| | M) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | N)ATTIC VENT INFORMATION ON PAGE 2 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. TYPICALLY, THE RATIO IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. |
| | SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. OR PERSON PREPARING THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON SEC. |
| | R806.2. FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY DONE. THE ATTIC VENT RATIO WAS REVISED BUT |
| | THE ATTIC AREA WAS NOT. SEE PLANS FOR PITCHED ROOF |
| | AREAS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | O)DOORS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | NOTE: GLAZING IN DOORS NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | WINDOW GLAZING AREA. SEE SEC. R405.5.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION). ALSO, CHECK MATERIAL OF SPECIFIED DOORS |
| | (METAL, WOOD, INSULATED FIBERGLASS, ETC.) |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. SEE NOTE ABOUT GLAZING IN DOORS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | P)WINDOWS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | NOTE: GLAZING IN DOORS NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | WINDOW GLAZING AREA. SEE SEC. R405.5.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION). ALSO, CHECK MATERIAL OF SPECIFIED |
| | WINDOWS (VINYL OR METAL). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #13(O) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
