| Date |
Text |
| 2022-03-25 10:55:05 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) THERE IS NO INDICATION NOR DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THE FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS PER F.A.C. |
| | 69 A. |
| | |
| | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, |
| | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE |
| | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF |
| | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR |
| | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER |
| | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) |
| | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS |
| | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 61G15-30.003 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | (1) ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS ARE PREPARED IN THE COURSE OF |
| | PERFORMING ENGINEERING SERVICES. WHEN PREPARED FOR |
| | INCLUSION WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A GENERAL BUILDING |
| | PERMIT, THE DOCUMENTS SHALL MEET ALL ENGINEER?S |
| | RESPONSIBILITY RULES, SET FORTH IN CHAPTERS 61G15-31, |
| | 61G15-32, 61G15-33, AND 61G15-34, F.A.C., AND BE OF |
| | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT |
| | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE, ADOPTED IN SECTION 553.73, F.S., AND APPLICABLE |
| | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED |
| | BY THE AHJ. THE DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE: |
| | |
| | THOUGH A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM |
| | HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, THOSE DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | ATTACHED TO THIS MASTER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE ARE INDICATIONS ON THE LIFE SAFETY SHEETS THAT |
| | A MANUAL FIRE ALARM IS NOT REQUIRED; HOWEVER, WHERE A |
| | FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED IT SHALL BE |
| | MONITORED. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 9 |
| | 9.7.2.1.1 WHERE SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS |
| | ARE REQUIRED |
| | BY ANOTHER SECTION OF THIS CODE, SUPERVISORY |
| | ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE |
| | INSTALLED AND MONITORED FOR INTEGRITY IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH NFPA 72 AND |
| | A DISTINCTIVE SUPERVISORY SIGNAL SHALL BE PROVIDED TO |
| | INDICATE A CONDITION |
| | THAT WOULD IMPAIR THE SATISFACTORY OPERATION OF THE |
| | SPRINKLER SYSTEM. |
| | 9.7.2.1.2 SUPERVISORY SIGNALS SHALL SOUND AND SHALL BE |
| | DISPLAYED EITHER AT |
| | A LOCATION WITHIN THE PROTECTED BUILDING THAT IS |
| | CONSTANTLY ATTENDED BY QUALI FIED PERSONNEL OR AT AN |
| | APPROVED, REMOTELY LOCATED RECEIVING FACILITY. |
| | 9.7.2.2 ALARM SIGNAL TRANSMISSION. |
| | 9.7.2.2.1 WHERE SUPERVISION OF AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER |
| | SYSTEMS IS REQUIRED |
| | BY ANOTHER SECTION OF THIS CODE, WATERFLOW ALARMS SHALL |
| | BE TRANSMITTED |
| | TO AN APPROVED, PROPRIETARY ALARM-RECEIVING FACILITY, A |
| | REMOTE STATION, A |
| | CENTRAL STATION, OR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| | 9.7.2.2.2 THE CONNECTION DESCRIBED IN 9.7.2.2.1 SHALL |
| | BE IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH 9.6.1.3. |
| | |
| | 9.6.1.3 FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE SHALL |
| | BE INSTALLED, |
| | TESTED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF NFPA 70 AND NFPA 72 UNLESS IT IS AN APPROVED |
| | EXISTING INSTALLATION, |
| | WHICH SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE CONTINUED IN USE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE A CLOUDED NOTE OF |
| | ACKNOWLEDGMENT ON THESE PAGES. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
