| Date |
Text |
| 2022-10-14 15:15:54 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE A SURVEY OF THE |
| | PROPERTY WHICH INCLUDES THE EXISTING SIGN LOCATIONS. |
| | THE SURVEY IS TO SHOW ALL OF THE EXISTING EASEMENTS AND |
| | THAT THE SIGNS ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE EASEMENTS. |
| | *** WHILE IT IS NOT A SURVEY, IT APPEARS THAT THE PLAN |
| | SHEET SHOWING ONLY SIGNS E-072 AND E-072 DID USE A |
| | CUT/PASTE FROM A SURVEY AS ITS BASE INFORMATION. THE |
| | OVERALL SITE PLAN IS NOT A SURVEY, NOR IS THE BASE |
| | INFORMATION CUT/PASTE FROM A SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 2) SIGN E-001 |
| | |
| | A. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE TO THE SIGN. A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET IS |
| | REQUIRED. *** CONTRARY TO THE RESPONSE, NO SHEET HAS |
| | BEEN SUBMITTED SHOWING THE SIGN SETBACK. |
| | B. SIZE CONFORMS TO THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM. |
| | |
| | 3) SIGN E-002: |
| | |
| | A. UPDATED COMMENT: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE JFK NORTH |
| | CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THIS DIRECTIONAL SIGN |
| | MUST INCLUDE INFORMATION ON NAVIGATING TO BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CAMPUS (EX. THE |
| | PAVILION) SO THAT PATIENTS CAN KNOW WHICH DIRECTION TO |
| | GO WITHOUT USING THE ONE-WAY SOUTH LANE BY THE ER. *** |
| | THE SIGN FAILS TO DIRECT USERS TO HEAD WEST (SIDE A) IF |
| | THEY ARE GOING TO THE BUILDING CURRENTLY SIGNED AS |
| | PAVILION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CAMPUS. NOTE: IF SIGN |
| | E-03 IS UPDATED TO HAVE USERS HEAD WEST TO THE |
| | PAVILION, THIS WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED ON THIS SIGN. |
| | C. SIZE CONFORMS TO THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM. |
| | |
| | 4) SIGN E-003 |
| | |
| | A. SEE COMMENT 3)A. REGARDING THE REQUIRED WAYFINDING |
| | TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CAMPUS. IT SHOULD BE ON SIDE A |
| | OF THIS SIGN, BUT IF NOT, IT WILL NEED TO BE ON SIGN |
| | E-002.. |
| | B. SIZE CONFORMS TO THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM. |
| | |
| | 4) SIGN E-013 - APPROVED |
| | |
| | SOUTH FACADE |
| | |
| | PERMITTED SIGNAGE: 689 SF |
| | PROPOSED SIGN: 104.75 SF |
| | |
| | 5) SIGN E-035 |
| | |
| | A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PHOTO SHOWING THE NORTH FACADE |
| | OF THE BUILDING SHOWS AT LEAST ONE OTHER SIGN ON THE |
| | NORTH FACADE. YOU MUST SUPPLY A BETTER PHOTO(S) WHICH |
| | SHOWS THE ENTIRE FACADE, NOT BLOCKED BY TREES, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF ALL THE SIGNS THAT CURRENTLY |
| | EXIST. *** WHILE THE INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THE |
| | EXISTING SIGN INDICATES THAT THE ALLOWED SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | WILL NOT BE EXCEEDED, STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY SINCE |
| | THE NEW ELEVATION DRAWING REFERENCED IN THE RESPONSE |
| | COMMENTS WAS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | NORTH FACADE |
| | |
| | PERMITTED SIGNAGE: 689 SF |
| | EXISTING OUTPATIENT SIGN: 94.95 SF |
| | PROPOSED SIGN: 41 SF |
| | TOTAL SIGNAGE: 135.95 SF |
| | |
| | 6) SIGN E-051 - APPROVED |
| | |
| | PERMITTED SIGNAGE: 145.5 SF |
| | PROPOSED SIGN: 40.35 SF |
| | |
| | 7) SIGN E-061 - APPROVED |
| | |
| | 8) SIGN E-064 - REMOVED FROM SCOPE. |
| | |
| | 9) SIGN E-068 - REMOVED FROM SCOPE. |
| | |
| | 10) SIGN E-072 - APPROVED |
| | |
| | 11) SIGN E-073 - APPROVED |
| | |
| | 12) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE MISSING A |
| | REQUIRED DIRECTIONAL SIGN ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE, |
| | GENERALLY AT THE TERMINUS OF THE SOUTHERN ENTRY DRIVE |
| | THAT DIRECTS DRIVERS TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CAMPUS. |
| | THIS SIGN WAS INSTALLED UNDER PERMIT 21061422 AND |
| | PASSED INSPECTION ON DECEMBER 3, 2021. IF THIS SIGN HAS |
| | BEEN REMOVED (AS INDICATED IN THE RESPONSE LETTER), |
| | THEN THE SITE IS IN VIOLATION OF ITS DEVELOPMENT ORDER |
| | AND STAFF WILL NOT APPROVE THIS PERMIT UNLESS IT |
| | INCLUDES A REPLACEMENT SIGN. IF THE RESPONSE WAS IN |
| | ERROR AND THE SIGN STILL EXISTS AND WILL BE CHANGED OUT |
| | AT A LATER DATE, YOU MUST PROVIDE A PHOTO OF THE |
| | EXISTING SIGN. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
