| Date |
Text |
| 2022-01-26 14:52:45 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 7TH EDITION (2020) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | BRIGHT BIKE DOCKING STATIONS (MASTER) PLAN REVIEW. |
| | 501 EVERNIA ST. |
| | STATUS: DENIED |
| | |
| | BUILDING/STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | 1) THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS FOR DECO BIKE IS NOT DIGITALLY |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER. ELECTRONICALLY |
| | SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE ARCHITECT |
| | OR ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON THEM. YOU ALSO HAVE |
| | THE OPTION TO SUBMIT THE SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER |
| | VERSION OF DRAWINGS. AFTER THE ELECTRONIC PLANS HAVE |
| | BEEN APPROVED, YOU CAN SUBMIT THE CORRESPONDING PAPER |
| | DRAWINGS AT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO BE VERIFIED. THE |
| | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE |
| | AND SEAL IS REQUIRED TO BE ON THE DRAWINGS. NO |
| | PHOTOCOPY OR OTHER FACSIMILES OF THE SIGNATURE ARE |
| | ACCEPTABLE. FS 481 & 61G1 OR FS 471 & 61G15 |
| | 2) THE WIND LOAD ANALYSIS IS BASED ON ASCE 7-10 AND THE |
| | PROJECT IS UNDER THE 2020 FBC WHICH REFERENCES ASCE |
| | 7-16. PLEASE UPDATE. FBC CHAPTER 35 |
| | 3) THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY SPECIFIED IS C. DUE TO THIS |
| | BEING A MASTER PLAN, THE LOCATIONS OF ALL DOCKING |
| | STATIONS NEED TO BE EVALUATED AND THE WORST CASE SHOULD |
| | BE TO DETERMINE THE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS. FBC |
| | 1609.4.3 |
| | 4) THE CALCULATIONS FOR DECO BIKE LLC USES THE WIND |
| | DESIGN SPEED OF 165 MPH AND EXPOSURE CATEGORY B. |
| | BECAUSE THIS WILL BE A MASTER PERMIT, THE LOCATIONS OF |
| | ALL DOCKING STATIONS NEED TO BE EVALUATED AND THE WORST |
| | CASE WIND SPEED AND EXPOSURE CATEGORY SHOULD BE TO |
| | DETERMINE THE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS. FBC 1609.4.3 |
| | 5) THERE IS A NOTE ON PAGE 3 OF THE CALCULATIONS WHICH |
| | STATES THE CALCULATIONS ARE FOR THE DECO BIKE DOCK |
| | STANDS TO RESIST HURRICANE WIND LOADS AND ALL OTHER |
| | ITEMS, BIKES, KIOSK WILL BE REMOVED IN THE EVENT OF A |
| | HURRICANE. A STORM PREPARATION PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | WHICH SPECIFIES THE ITEMS THAT WILL BE REMOVED, WHEN |
| | THE ITEMS WILL BE REMOVED (AT WHICH TIME PRIOR TO THE |
| | WIND EVENT), WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING THEM |
| | (PROVIDE CONTACT INFORMATION) AND WHERE THEY WILL BE |
| | STORED. FBC AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | 6) INFORMATIONAL - SEPARATE PERMITS ALONG WITH A |
| | SURVEY/SITE PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH LOCATION. |
| | FBC AMENDMENTS 107.2.5 |
| | 7) THE PROPOSED ANCHORING METHOD FOR THE EQUIPMENT IS |
| | TO BE PROVIDED WITH EACH SEPARATE APPLICATION DEPENDING |
| | ON THE TYPE OF BASE SUBSTRATE AT THAT LOCATION. FBC |
| | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | 8) THE DECO BIKE RATIONAL ANALYSIS ENGINEERING IS BASED |
| | ON A 6? CONCRETE SLAB. MOST OF THE SIDE WALKS AND |
| | EXISTING SLABS ARE TYPICALLY 4?. MAKE SURE THE |
| | ENGINEERING MATCHES THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE |
| | SITE. FBC AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| | 9) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH |
| | OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | INFO ONLY - THIS WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE FOLLOWING |
| | LOCATIONS: |
| | |
| | STATION 1 - 22010670 |
| | STATION 2 - 22010671 |
| | STATION 3 - 22010672 |
| | STATION 4 - 22010673 |
| | STATION 5 - 22010674 |
| | STATION 6 - 22010676 |
| | STATION 7 - 22010677 |
| | STATION 8 - 22010678 |
| | STATION 9 - 22010680 |
| | STATION 11 - 22010681 |
| | STATION 12 - 22010683 |
| | STATION 13 - 220100685 |
| | STATION 14 - 22010686 |
| | STATION 16 - 22010687 |
| | STATION 17 - 22010688 |
| | STATION 19 - 22010689 |
| | |
| | |
