| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-05 17:39:29 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #22010353 |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY SEC. 605 AND SEC. 1001.2.1, SEC. |
| | 604 AND SEC. 901.2, SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | ALL NEW WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND |
| | METHODS REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LEVEL 3 ALTERATION. SEC. 604 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | SEC. 901.2 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. SEC. 801.3 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, |
| | COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- ENTRY DOOR DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE MIN. CLEAR WIDTH |
| | OF 32" AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOW DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE |
| | MINIMUM CLEAR HEIGHT OPENING REQUIREMENT OF SEC. |
| | R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- THIS IS A CHANGE OF USE FROM GARAGE TO LIVABLE |
| | SPACE. TYPICALLY, GARAGES ARE BUILT WITHOUT A FLOOR |
| | VAPOR BARRIER. ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO PROVIDE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONCRETE SLAB VAPOR BARRIER AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R506.2.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- EXTERIOR WALL: NEED TO SPECIFY TWO LAYERS OF WATER |
| | RESISTIVE BARRIERS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. SEC. R703.7.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- ARCHITECT TO REVISE DESCRIPTION OF WORK ON SHEET |
| | G001. THIS IS A CHANGE OF USE FROM GARAGE TO LIVABLE |
| | SPACE (SEC. 605 FBC FBC-EXISTING BUILDING). AND THIS IS |
| | ALTERATION LEVEL 3 (SEC. 604 FBC FBC-EXISTING BUILDING) |
| | NOT ALTERATION LEVEL 2. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- REVISE WINDOWS AND DOORS STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAILS. |
| | REVISE STRUCTURAL BUCK SIZE. STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO |
| | PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ALSO, BEVELED BUCKS |
| | ARE NOT LONGER ALLOWED. REVISE ALL DETAILS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- NO SURE IF ROOF SHINGLES ARE GOING TO BE REPLACED OR |
| | NOT. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SAY NO CHANGES BUT |
| | CONTRACTOR'S CONTRACT SUBMITTED INCLUDE ROOFING. |
| | CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. |
| | IF REPLACING ROOF SHINGLES, THEN ARCHITECT OF RECORD |
| | NEEDS TO SPECIFY HOW COMPLYING WITH THE NEW 2020 CODE |
| | REQUIREMENT FOR ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT. SEC. R905.1.1.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY WHICH METHOD OF SEC. R905.1.1.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL IS GOING TO BE USED. AND PROVIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY F.A.C. 61G20-3.001. |
| | ROOFING SUB-PERMIT IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | A) ROOF SHINGLES ( IF REPLACED) |
| | B) ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | (INCLUDING THOSE ALREADY SUBMITTED) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
