| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-20 16:49:07 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE(R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21120564 518 COLONIAL RD |
| | |
| | 1- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R101.5 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE CALCULATIONS ARE SIGNED BY ALL |
| | THE REQUIRED PARTIES, INCLUDING THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED |
| | AGENT TO AVOID CONFLICT/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED; |
| | A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM R405-2020 IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| | CERTIFIED AT THE BOTTOM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S |
| | ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY |
| | THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM. NEED |
| | OWNER'S NAME, BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C)CEILING R-30 VALUE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 IS INCORRECT. |
| | IT DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION ENTERED ON PAGE 1. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)WINDOWS OVERHANG SEPARATION SPECIFIED ON PAGE 4 IS |
| | INCORRECT. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | CLEAR OPENING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE SIZE OF WINDOW WITH PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED SHEET A-2 WAS NOT RESUBMITTED. UNABLE TO SEE |
| | CHANGES STATED ON ENGINEER'S RESPONSE LETTER. EGRESS |
| | WINDOW COMMENT WAS FOR BEDROOM #1, I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT |
| | BEING SPECIFIC ON MY PREVIOUS COMMENT. |
| | FOR CLARIFICATION SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS (2'-6"X4'-1") |
| | DON'T COMPLY WITH ALL THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. |
| | R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, INCLUDING MINIMUM CLEAR |
| | HEIGHT. |
| | NOTE: IF SPECIFYING CASEMENT WINDOWS, THEN CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY EGRESS HINGE. DEPENDING ON THE WINDOW SIZE NOT |
| | ALL CASEMENT WINDOWS COMPLY, EXCEPT FOR THOSE WITH THE |
| | EGRESS HINGE PROVIDING THE MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 4- OK. |
| | 5- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE. SEC. R807.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED SHEET A-2 WAS NOT RESUBMITTED. UNABLE TO SEE |
| | CHANGES STATED ON ENGINEER'S RESPONSE LETTER. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ON THE |
| | FIRST SUBMITTAL. COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE ALWAYS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. LISTING THE NOA OR |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER ON DRAWINGS DOESN'T |
| | SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. COMMENTS BELOW APPLY TO THOSE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | A)EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE. NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, INCLUDING |
| | THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT |
| | CORRESPONDS TO THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. NOTE: THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT SHOWS |
| | IF PRODUCT IS APPROVED AND CURRENT CODE IN EFFECT. |
| | CHAPTER 553 F.S. |
| | NOTE: THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED. ONE IS A MIAMI DADE NOA AND THE OTHER ONES |
| | ARE TWO FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS. CLARIFY WHICH ONES |
| | ARE GOING TO BE INSTALLED AND WHERE. FOR EXAMPLE, ENTRY |
| | DOOR OR BEDROOM #2. |
| | |
| | B)WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CASEMENT WINDOWS NOA 20-0402.02 SUBMITTED IS |
| | INCOMPLETE. ONLY THE COVER PAGE WAS SUBMITTED. NEED TO |
| | SUBMIT COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | C)WINDOW MULLIONS (NOTE: NEED TO SPECIFY MULLION SIZE |
| | TO AVOID DELAYS/CONFLICTS). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | MULLION SIZE WAS NOT SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | D)ROOF SHINGLES. OK. |
| | |
| | E)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THERMA-TRU FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL LISTED ON SHEET S-2 |
| | DOESN'T MATCH THOSE UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX. COORDINATE |
| | WITH ITEM #7(A) AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 9- HOUSE IS DESIGNED WITH UNVENTED ATTIC. ENGINEER IS |
| | SPECIFYING R-20 SPRAY INSULATION. PROVIDE ICC |
| | EVALUATION REPORT FOR THIS FOAM TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE |
| | REPORT IN WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ONLY THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS WAS |
| | PROVIDED. NEED TO SUBMIT THE ACTUAL ICC CURRENT |
| | EVALUATION REPORT AS REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 10- OK. |
| | 11- OK. |
| | 12- OK. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
