| Date |
Text |
| 2023-02-06 17:24:32 | WCF |
| | |
| | INSUFFICIENT |
| | |
| | 1) THE POLE HAS BEEN MOVED FROM ITS PRIOR LOCATION THAT |
| | WAS APPROVED BY ZONING. SINCE THE SOUTH BUILDING ON THE |
| | PROPERTY AT 1401 NORTH SAPODILLA IS A MIXED-USE |
| | BUILDING, THE PROVISION OF NOT BEING LOCATED DIRECTLY |
| | IN FRONT OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING DOES NOT APPLY FOR |
| | THE POLE LOCATION ON 13TH STREET. THE STATE HISTORIC |
| | PRESERVATION REVIEW THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THIS SITE STILL APPLIES. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SURVEY NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE POLE HEIGHTS FOR THE |
| | UTILITY POLES IN THE 13TH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SO THAT |
| | STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED 28-FOOT TALL POLE IS |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE UTILITY POLE HEIGHTS WITHIN THE |
| | 13TH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | 3) PLEASE REVIEW THE SURVEY AND SITE PLAN LOCATIONS FOR |
| | THE PROPOSED HANDHOLE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 13TH |
| | STREET AND SAPODILLA. COMPARING THE SURVEY AND THE PLAN |
| | TO THE STREET VIEW SEEMS TO INDICATE THAT THE HANDHOLE |
| | WILL BE LOCATED WITH THE RAMP THAT TRANSITIONS FROM THE |
| | SIDEWALK HEIGHT TO THE STREET GRADE AND THUS WOULD NOT |
| | BE IN ADA COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 4) THE HANDHOLE LOCATION SEEMS TO CONTRADICT THE |
| | ENGINEERING DIVISION COMMENT REGARDING THE PROXIMITY TO |
| | THE CITY'S WATER LINE. |
| | |
| | 5) THE REVISED POLE PLACEMENT SHOWS A GAS LINE WITHIN |
| | 1-FOOT OF THE BORE PIT DIG AT THE BASE OF THE NEW POLE |
| | LOCATION. PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED PUBLIC UTILITY |
| | LETTER OF NO OBJECTION FROM FPU FOR THIS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 6) THE POLE STYLE AND COLOR MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 561-822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
