| Date |
Text |
| 2022-04-12 16:12:41 | SECOND BUILDING AUDIT FOR PERMIT #21110176 |
| | PRIVATE PROVIDER |
| | SEC. 553.791 F.S. |
| | |
| | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE |
| | CODE IN EFFECT: FBC-RESIDENTIAL,7TH EDITION, 2020. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING SPECIFIED ON SHEET |
| | S-2 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH TABLE R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (A)REPEAT COMMENT. ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF ROOF |
| | DIAGRAMS STILL DON'T COMPLY WITH TABLE R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE TABLE AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (B)ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN |
| | ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF ROOF DIAGRAMS IS MISSING ROOF |
| | ZONE 2N. |
| | SEC. R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | (C)ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN |
| | ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF ROOF DIAGRAMS ARE SHOWING TWO |
| | DIFFERENT NAILING SPACING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROOF ZONE |
| | 2E AND 2R. THIS IS NO CLEAR. PROVIDE ONLY ONE NAILING |
| | SPECIFICATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2- OK. |
| | 3- OK. |
| | 4- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- WIND DESIGN INFORMATION ON SHEET A-1 IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | ULTIMATE WIND SPEED AND NOMINAL WIND SPEED UNDER WALL |
| | PRESSURES DON'T MATCH THE ULTIMATE WIND SPEED AND |
| | NOMINAL WIND SPEED UNDER WIND DESIGN BASIS SHOWN ON THE |
| | SAME SHEET. REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. WHICH ONE IS |
| | THE CORRECT DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THIS HOUSE? SEC. |
| | R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: REVISE WINDOWS/DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES ACCORDINGLY |
| | TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ONE OF THE WINDOWS "C" ON BEDROOM #2 IS LOCATED IN ZONE |
| | 5. THEREFORE, THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THIS WINDOW IS |
| | INCORRECT AS SPECIFIED ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE AND |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL AFFIDAVIT UNDER "DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES". REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)DOOR INFORMATION SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. THERE IS |
| | NOT INSULATED DOOR ON THE SOUTH SIDE. THIS IS A |
| | METAL/GLASS FRENCH DOOR. NOTE: GLAZING IN DOORS NEEDS |
| | TO BE INCLUDED IN THE WINDOW GLAZING AREA. SEE SEC. |
| | R405.5.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. DOOR ON THE SOUTH SIDE WAS CHANGED TO |
| | WOOD. PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DON'T |
| | SPECIFY WOOD DOOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: A METAL DOOR (2.67'X 8.0') WAS ADDED TO THE |
| | WINDOW LIST, THEN IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE IS THE WOOD |
| | DOOR LOCATED AT. PLEASE CHECK, REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | AVOID CONFLICTS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN ON PAGE 3 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-. ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION |
| | INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE FRONT ELEVATION |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D)WINDOW AREA SHOWN ON PAGE 3 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-. ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. WINDOW AREA FOR BEDROOM #2 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
