| Date |
Text |
| 2022-02-19 14:21:17 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 02.19.2022 |
| | PERMIT NO.: 21100715 |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - A CURRENT AND ACCURATE SURVEY |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - A SITE PLAN SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED INDICATING THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 2.1. [ SATISFIED ] - DATE, NORTH ARROW, AND A GRAPHIC |
| | SCALE. |
| | |
| | 2.2. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - VICINITY MAP SHOWING THE |
| | PROPERTY IN RELATION TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. |
| | |
| | 2.3. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE, |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY, PROPOSED/EXISTING EASEMENTS, WATER |
| | COURSES AND OTHER ESSENTIAL FEATURES. |
| | |
| | 2.3.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - SITE PLAN INDICATES A SIX (6) |
| | FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINE; THE |
| | LIMITS OF THE EASEMENT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED. |
| | |
| | 2.4. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - STREETS, DRIVEWAYS, |
| | INTERSECTIONS, CURBS CUTS AND TURNING LANES ADJACENT TO |
| | OR ACROSS FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 2.5. [ SATISFIED ] - THE OUTLINES OF ALL BUILDINGS WITH |
| | USES, SETBACKS, DIMENSIONS, FLOOR AREA, NUMBER OF |
| | STORIES, HEIGHT AND POINTS OF ACCESS. |
| | |
| | 2.6. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL |
| | PERIMETER TREATMENT (SIDEWALKS, FENCES, WALLS, OR |
| | BERMS). |
| | |
| | 2.7. [ SATISFIED ] - MEANS OF VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN |
| | ACCESS TO AND FROM THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 2.8. [ SATISFIED ] - LAYOUT AND LOCATION OF ALL |
| | OFF-STREET PARKING, LOADING AND OTHER VEHICULAR USE |
| | AREAS, INCLUDING WHERE APPLICABLE, THE DISTANCE FROM |
| | THE PRINCIPLE USES. |
| | |
| | 2.9. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - SUPPLY A DATA TABLE THAT |
| | INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 2.9.1. [ SATISFIED ] - EXISTING/PROPOSED LAND USE AND |
| | ZONING. |
| | |
| | 2.9.2. [ SATISFIED ] - TOTAL ACRES OF THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 2.9.3. [ SATISFIED ] - TOTAL GROSS BUILDING SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE. |
| | |
| | 2.9.4. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE, |
| | LANDSCAPING, BUILDING COVERAGE & IMPERMEABLE SURFACE. |
| | |
| | 2.9.5. [ SATISFIED ] - ACRES AND PERCENT OF WATER |
| | BODIES. |
| | |
| | 2.9.6. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - DENSITY AND NUMBER OF |
| | DWELLING UNITS (RESIDENTIAL). |
| | |
| | 2.9.7. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PARKING COMPUTATIONS |
| | (REQUIRED, PROVIDED, ETC.) |
| | |
| | 2.9.8. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR). |
| | |
| | 3. [ SATISFIED ] - FLOOR PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | CLEARLY INDICATING EXISTING AND PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 3.1. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DEMO PLAN DOES NOT ACCURATELY |
| | REFLECT THE FULL SCOPE OF THE DEMOLITION THAT WILL BE |
| | OCCURRING BASED UPON THE PROPOSED FLOOR |
| | PLAN/ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4. [ SATISFIED ] - ELEVATIONS SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY |
| | EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL AS ALL ADDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 5. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - ELEVATIONS SHALL INDICATE THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, AS DEFINED BY THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (GRADE THE MEAN POINT OF |
| | THE PITCHED ROOF). |
| | |
| | 6. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441 |
| | OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | (ZLDRS), BECAUSE THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK EXCEEDS 50 |
| | PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, THE |
| | SITE SHALL BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV |
| | (LANDSCAPING) OF THE ZLDRS. PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED |
| | INDICATING SUCH. IF EXISTING MATERIAL IS SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLANS AND ALL PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV HAVE BEEN MET, |
| | THEN NO ADDITIONAL PERMIT/INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED. IF |
| | THE EXISTING MATERIAL ON SITE DOES NOT CONFORM TO ALL |
| | OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV, THEN ADDITIONAL |
| | MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND |
| | PERMITTED UNDER A LANDSCAPE PERMIT. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | PLANS SHOULD INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 6.1. [ SATISFIED - TO BE REVIEWED AS SEPARATE LANDSCAPE |
| | PERMIT ] - THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | STRUCTURES, IMPROVEMENTS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 6.2. [ SATISFIED - TO BE REVIEWED AS SEPARATE LANDSCAPE |
| | PERMIT ] - THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | TREES, SHRUBS, GROUND COVERS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 6.3. [ SATISFIED - TO BE REVIEWED AS SEPARATE LANDSCAPE |
| | PERMIT ] - THE LOCATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE |
| | EASEMENTS, OVERHEAD LINES, WATER METERS, TRANSFORMERS, |
| | CHECK VALVES, CLEAN OUTS, FIRE HYDRANTS, LIGHT POLES, |
| | ETC. THAT MAY IMPACT LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 6.4. [ SATISFIED - TO BE REVIEWED AS SEPARATE LANDSCAPE |
| | PERMIT ] - TABULATION TABLE INDICATING HOW THE EXISTING |
| | AND PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL COMPLIES WITH ARTICLE XIV. |
| | |
| | 6.5. [ SATISFIED - TO BE REVIEWED AS SEPARATE LANDSCAPE |
| | PERMIT ] - SPECIES, QUANTITY, HEIGHT, SPREAD, SPACING, |
| | AND LOCATION OF THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PLANT |
| | MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | 6.6. [ SATISFIED - TO BE REVIEWED AS SEPARATE LANDSCAPE |
| | PERMIT ] - STATEMENT THAT ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE |
| | PROVIDED WITH A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM, |
| | INCLUDING THE ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY (PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | ANY NEW IRRIGATION SHALL BE DONE UNDER A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT). |
| | |
| | 6.7. [ NEW COMMENT ] - LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF NEW MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS A |
| | SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 7. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY |
| | EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY (IF NECESSARY) A TREE |
| | ALTERATION SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY?S |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | YOU MAY CONTACT RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER, |
| | AT 561.822.1462. |
| | |
| | 7.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - LANDSCAPE PLAN INDICATING REMOVAL |
| | OF EXISTING TREES/PALMS. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8. [ NEW COMMENT ] - SITE PLAN INDICATES A SIX (6) FOOT |
| | CHAIN LINK FENCE WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK; FENCES IN |
| | THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN |
| | HEIGHT. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
