| Date |
Text |
| 2021-11-09 17:53:09 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21091020 |
| | |
| | NOTE; |
| | THIS COMMENTS APPLY TO MAIN HOUSE ONLY. CONTRACTOR WILL |
| | SUBMIT PLANS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR |
| | THE GARAGE CONVERSION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- COVER SHEET (CVR): |
| | |
| | A) OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) REVISE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING INFORMATION TO MATCH |
| | ACTUAL CONDITIONS. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT, ROOF GEOMETRIC AND |
| | ROOF SLOPE ARE INCORRECT. THIS IS A TWO STORY BUILDING. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ACTUAL BUILDING |
| | DESCRIPTION. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | BUILDING MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS INCORRECT AGAIN. THIS IS A |
| | TWO STORY HOUSE. IT CAN NOT BE 16 FEET. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) AREA CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT. PROVIDE BUILDING |
| | DIMENSIONS AND REVISE AREA CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. AREA CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | INCORRECT. IT LOOKS LIKE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS TAKING |
| | THE AREA CALCULATIONS FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISER. THE FOOTPRINT SHOWN ON SHEET A-1 AND THE |
| | FOOTPRINT SHOWN ON THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISER WEBSITE DON'T MATCH. THEREFORE, CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE INCORRECT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL |
| | CALCULATIONS OF THE BUILDING SHOWN ON SHEET A-1. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
