| Date |
Text |
| 2022-03-08 13:10:53 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD AUDIT. |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21090499 |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS AUDIT: |
| | 1- PROPOSED DRAINAGE & SITE PLAN ON SHEET SP-1: |
| | BASED ON THE BOUNDARY SURVEY SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED |
| | DRAINAGE PLAN THIS LOT WILL HAVE FINISH GRADE |
| | ELEVATIONS A COUPLE OF FEET (3 FEET +/-) HIGHER THAN |
| | EXISTING GRADES. PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN IS INCOMPLETE. |
| | IT DOESN'T SHOW ANY RETAINING WALLS SHOWING HOW THIS |
| | ELEVATED SOIL WILL BE SUPPORTED. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. ALSO, THE HOUSE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION |
| | SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN DON'T |
| | MATCH. |
| | NOTE: SEPARATE PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | RETAINING WALLS. ALSO, KEEP IN CONSIDERATION THAT THERE |
| | IS A DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE NORTH WEST SIDE OF THIS |
| | LOT. COORDINATE WITH THE PERTINENT UTILITY TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | (1)REVISED DRAINAGE & SITE PLAN DOESN'T SHOW LOCATION |
| | OF THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. SEC. R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | (2)LOCATION OF THE RETAINING WALL IS NOT SHOWN. |
| | TYPICALLY, THE RETAINING WALL IS LOCATED NEXT TO THE |
| | PROPERTY LINES. IF THIS IS THE CASE, THEN THE PROPOSED |
| | RETAINING WALL DETAIL IS SHOWING A FOOTING ENCROACHING |
| | INTO THE NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. REVISE/CLARIFY AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R401.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | (3)RETAINING WALL DETAIL DOESN'T REFLECT A RETAINING |
| | WALL. THE GRADE ELEVATION IS THE SAME ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE WALL. REVISE THE DETAIL AS REQUIRED TO REFLECT THE |
| | ACTUAL PROPOSED CONDITIONS, INCLUDING THE GRADE |
| | ELEVATION DIFFERENCE. AND, CLEARLY SPECIFY PROPOSED |
| | WALL HEIGHT. |
| | SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R401.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | (4)BOUNDARY SURVEY & SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOW A 12 FOOT |
| | DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL BY THE |
| | PERTINENT ENTITIES (NPBCID AND THE POA) WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (5)BOUNDARY SURVEY & SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOW A 25 FOOT |
| | CONSERVATION EASEMENT ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF THE |
| | PROPERTY. APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL BY |
| | THE PERTINENT ENTITIES (NPBCID AND THE POA) WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (6) SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THE RETAINING WALL. |
| | SINCE THE RETAINING WALL IS PROPOSED FOR THE HOUSE |
| | CONSTRUCTION AND THIS WALL IS CONTINGENT ON THE NPBCID |
| | AND THE POA APPROVAL, THEN THE RETAINING WALL PERMIT IS |
| | REQUIRED AT THIS TIME TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
