| Date |
Text |
| 2022-04-08 14:47:28 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 7 TH REVIEW: FBC SEVENTH EDITION (2020) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | NOTE: IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CITY BUILDING DIVISION |
| | THAT THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS PROPOSED FOR THE ROOF |
| | TOP GAZEBO ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED BY THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | 1) NOT RESOLVED. [ SUBMIT NEW ENGINEERING FOR OPENING |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES. SEE COMMENT #2. ] PROVIDE A LETTER |
| | FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER AFFIRMING THAT THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF THESE ROLL-UP STORM SHUTTERS WILL NOT |
| | HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE HOST STRUCTURE WHEN IN |
| | USE DURING A WIND EVENT. FBC 1604.2 & 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 2) NOT RESOLVED. [ THE DESIGN PRESSURES IN THE LATEST |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AND THE UPDATED DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FROM STORM SMART DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE OPENING |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FROM THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER |
| | (ENGINEERING EXPRESS). BECAUSE THIS IS A HIGHRISE |
| | BUILDING SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERING FROM A FLORIDA |
| | LICENSED P.E. FOR THE WINDLOAD DATA AND OPENING DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES IS REQUIRED. ] PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER |
| | EXPLAIN THE SUBSTANTIAL PRESSURE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR OPENING #1 AND THE OTHER OPENINGS. |
| | ESPECIALLY OPENING #5 WHICH IS IN THE SAME WALL ZONE |
| | AND IS 134.5 SQFT COMPARED TO 202.5 SQFT. FBC 1604.2 |
| | |
| | 3) RESOLVED. A NEW INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: THE OPENING SIZES AND DESIGN PRESSURES WILL HAVE |
| | TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ENGINEERING. FBC AMENDMENTS |
| | 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) RESOLVED. OPENIING SIZE WAS CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | 5) PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH |
| | OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
