| Date |
Text |
| 2022-06-02 17:09:17 | 6/3 - REVIEW OF AFFIDAVIT WILL BE DONE AFTER APPLICANT |
| | HAS UPLOADED ALL PLANS TO SATISFY OUTSIDE ENTITIES AND |
| | AFTER ENGINEERING, FIRE, ZONING HAVE APPROVED THOSE |
| | PLANS/THEIR REVIEWS. THERE ARE CURRENTLY TWO DIFFERENT |
| | VERSIONS OF CIVIL PLANS UPLOADED SO IT IS NOT CLEAR |
| | WHAT ENGINEERING, FIRE, ZONING REVIEWED. THE MULTIPAGE |
| | PDF WAS UPLOADED IN A MANNER THAT MADE THE SUBMITTAL |
| | EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO FIND. THE NEW ENGINEERING PLAN |
| | WAS UPLOADED AFTER ZONING PASSED THE REVIEW ON 4/8 BUT |
| | BECAUSE THE OLD CIVIL PAGES WERE NOT SUPERSEDED AS |
| | REQUIRED, IT WAS NOT ROUTED TO ZONING AND FIRE REVIEW. |
| | YOU CANNOT HAVE TWO DIFFERENT VERSIONS/DESIGNS OF THE |
| | SAME PAGES UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX. |
| | |
| | |
| | ****************************************************** |
| | 6/1 - AFFIDAVIT REVIEW IN PROGRESS (NOT COMPLETE) |
| | |
| | 1. THIS PROJECT CANNOT GO TO BUILDING DIVISION AUDIT |
| | UNTIL THE ENGINEERING ISSUE IS RESOLVED. ENGINEERING |
| | PASSED THE REVIEW WITH PROVISO TO UPLOAD THE APPROVED |
| | ENGINEERING PLANS. THERE ARE 28 CIVIL PAGES UPLOADED TO |
| | PROJECTDOX THAT ARE OUTDATED (PER ENGINEERING). THEY |
| | WERE UPLOADED IN MARCH AND ARE NOT THE APPROVED PLANS. |
| | A MULTIPAGE PDF (30 PAGES) WAS UPLOADED TO THE DRAWINGS |
| | FOLDER RATHER THAN SUPPORTING DOCS. DUE TO THE NAME |
| | THAT THE FILE WAS NAMED (APPROVED ENGINEERING PLANS), |
| | THIS FILE WAS NUMBER 765 IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER IN |
| | PROJECTDOX. THIS DOES NOT MEET ENGINEER'S PROVISO AND |
| | WAS ALSO NOT SEEN BY ZONING AND FIRE. ZONING PASSED THE |
| | PROJECT ON 4/8, THE NEW ENGINEERING PLANS UPLOADED ON |
| | 4/27. |
| | |
| | 2. SEE PREVIOUS LIST, A-821 IS NOT IN PROJECTDOX, NOT |
| | ON THE AFFIDAVIT, BUT IT IS INCLUDED IN THE INDEX. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
