| Date |
Text |
| 2022-01-11 11:08:29 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21080730 |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | ****ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | BEFORE PROVISO. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- DRAWINGS WERE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT |
| | AND ENGINEER OF RECORD. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 481 F.S. AND CHAPTER |
| | 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC |
| | RECORDS. |
| | SUBMIT DRAWINGS ELECTRONICALLY WITH |
| | ARCHITECT'S/ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR PROVIDE |
| | HARD COPY PLANS WITH ARCHITECT'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND |
| | SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THE FOLLOWING DRAWINGS WERE NOT SIGNED & SEALED: C-01, |
| | SP-01, A-00, A-02, A-03, A-04, S1, S3, S4, S5. |
| | |
| | 2- OK. |
| | 3- OK. |
| | 4- OK. |
| | |
| | 5-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)HIP & RIDGE METAL SUPPORT TO BE USED. AND, CLEARLY |
| | MARK SPECIFIC METAL CHANNEL TO BE INSTALLED. SEE |
| | PERFORMANCE LIMITATIONS TABLES ON PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT FL14317-R12 SUBMITTED: CLEARLY MARK |
| | WHICH TESTED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. SEE |
| | SEC. 5.8.2 AND SEC. 5.8.3 OF PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | THERE ARE 6 ASSEMBLIES. SPECIFY WHICH ASSEMBLY FROM |
| | SEC. 5.8.3.1 IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | STILL NOT CLEAR WHICH ASSEMBLY TO BE USED. TABLE 2 ON |
| | PAGE 4 OF 6 OF PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS MARKED, BUT IT |
| | DOESN'T CLARIFY IF USING ASTM D226 TYPE II FELT OR |
| | CITADEL PLUS AS THE SUBSTRATE. I F USING ASTM D226 FELT |
| | , THEN PROVIDE FRSA/TRI PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD USED. IF |
| | USING CITADEL PLUS , THEN CIRCLE WHICH ASSEMBLY IS |
| | GOING TO BE USED. SEE SEC. 5.8.2 OF PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 6- OK. |
| | 7- OK. |
| | 8- OK. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
