| Date |
Text |
| 2022-01-06 10:12:23 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21071257 |
| | |
| | 1- OK |
| | 2- OK |
| | 3- OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER |
| | RECOMMENDS THE BOTTOM OF THE FOUNDATION TO BE A MINIMUM |
| | OF 18 INCHES BELOW THE LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE TO ASSURE |
| | A SAFETY FACTOR AGAINST BEARING CAPACITY FAILURE. SEE |
| | PAGE 4 OF SOIL TEST REPORT. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO |
| | REVIEW SOIL TEST REPORT AND ACKNOWLEDGE IF GEOTECHNICAL |
| | ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT OR NOT. REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD IS THE ONE WHO NEEDS TO ACKNOWLEDGE |
| | IN WRITING (SIGNING AND SEALING) AND SPECIFYING WHY HE |
| | IS NOT FOLLOWING THE SOIL TEST REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL SECTION ON SHEET 9 OF 12. |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY SIZE AND SPACING OF ATTIC VENT. |
| | SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ATTIC VENT IS NOT CLEAR. REVISED AND RENAMED SHEET 010 |
| | A301 SHOWS TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL SECTION 1/A301 AND |
| | SOFFIT DETAIL 5/A301 WITH DIFFERENT SPECIFICATIONS. ONE |
| | SHOWS A WOOD SOFFIT AND THE OTHER ONE SHOWS AN ALUMINUM |
| | SOFFIT. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | ALSO, DETAIL 1/A301 SPECIFIES ALUMINUM SOFFIT. ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD TO SPECIFY SIZE OF VENT TO BE INSTALLED TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. |
| | R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR SIZES AND DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R703.1.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #5 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 7- ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SCHEDULE ON SHEET 10 OF 12: |
| | A)OK |
| | B)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)REVISE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS BASED |
| | ON REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES ON ITEM #7(B) ABOVE. SEC. |
| | 301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING. ROOF SHEATHING |
| | NEEDS TO BE NAILED AT 4 INCHES O.C. IN THE FIELD AND |
| | EDGES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 AND TABLE |
| | R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: REVISE ROOF SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS OR ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING THAT PROPOSED |
| | NAILING IS EQUAL OR BETTER THAN THE MIN. SPACING |
| | REQUIRED BY THE REFERENCED CODE SECTION. SEC. 107.2.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | D)OK. |
| | E)OK. |
| | |
| | 8-STAIR DETAILS ON SHEET 10 OF 12: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)TREAD DIMENSION CAN NOT BE LESS THAN 10". SEE SEC. |
| | R311.7.5.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: REVISE FLOOR PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED DRAWING 1/G501 SHOWN ON NEW RENAMED SHEET 011 |
| | G501 STILL SHOWS 9" TREAD. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVISE |
| | DETAIL. TREADS ARE MEASURED FROM TIP TO TIP OF NOSING. |
| | SEE SEC. R311.7.5.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR PROPER WAY OF |
| | MEASURING THE TREAD. "THE TREAD DEPTH SHALL BE MEASURED |
| | HORIZONTALLY BETWEEN THE VERTICAL PLANES OF THE |
| | FOREMOST PROJECTION OF ADJACENT TREADS". |
| | |
| | B)OK. |
| | |
| | C)NEW COMMENT BASED ON REVISED SHEET 011 G501 |
| | SUBMITTED: THERE IS A DIMENSION NOTE SPECIFYING "4-1/2" |
| | KNEE WALL W/ TREADS & RISERS BEYOND". THE DIMENSION |
| | GOES FROM THE EDGE OF THE STAIR NOSING TO THE TOP OF |
| | THE BOTTOM RAIL OF THE GUARDRAIL. WHAT IS THIS FOR?. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEE NOTE BELOW. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: CODE REQUIRES THE TRIANGULAR OPENING AT THE OPEN |
| | SIDE OF A STAIR, FORMED BY THE RISER, TREAD AND BOTTOM |
| | RAIL OF A GUARD, SHALL NOT ALLOW PASSAGE OF A SPHERE 6 |
| | INCHES IN DIAMETER. SEE EXCEPTION #1 OF SEC. R312.1.3 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 9- OK. |
| | 10- OK. |
| | |
| | 11-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. AND |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF PRODUCT APPROVAL FL17184-R8 |
| | SUBMITTED DON'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. NEED ANOTHER PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B)SLIDING GLASS DOORS. OK. |
| | C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D)METAL ROOF. AND, CLEARLY SPECIFY FASTENING METHOD. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ACCORDING TO PRODUCT APPROVAL FL27985.06 THE FASTENING |
| | METHOD IS NOT RATED (NR) FOR ROOF ZONES 2 AND 3. A |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR FASTENING AT THESE ROOF ZONES. SEE FASTENING TABLES |
| | ON PAGE 3 OF METAL ROOFING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. |
| | PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED CALCULATIONS OR PROVIDE |
| | ANOTHER PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES. |
| | |
| | E)WINDOW MULLIONS. OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS FOR METAL |
| | ROOFING. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD SPECIFICATIONS ON DETAIL 1/A301. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | G)ALUMINUM SOFFIT AND ROOF VENTS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY SIZE OF VENT TO BE |
| | INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SIZES AND DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | 12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
