| Date |
Text |
| 2021-08-24 13:46:11 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21071257 |
| | |
| | 1- LOT DRAINAGE |
| | PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2- CLEARLY SPECIFY SIZE OF BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS |
| | (WIDTH AND HEIGHT) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, SPECIALLY FOR SECOND FLOOR |
| | EGRESS WINDOWS. PLANS ONLY SPECIFY 25SH EGRESS BUT NO |
| | SIZE. |
| | |
| | 3- WIND INFORMATION ON SHEET 2 OF 12: |
| | A)MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS INCORRECT. SEE PLANS AND REVISE. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | B)SPECIFY THE SECOND FLOOR TRUSSES LIVE LOAD AS |
| | REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY DEAD |
| | LOADS ALSO. |
| | C)SPECIFY ROOF TRUSSES DEAD AND LIVE LOADS. CLEARLY |
| | SPECIFY TOP AND BOTTOM LOADS. INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE |
| | LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 4- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER |
| | RECOMMENDS THE BOTTOM OF THE FOUNDATION TO BE A MINIMUM |
| | OF 18 INCHES BELOW THE LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE TO ASSURE |
| | A SAFETY FACTOR AGAINST BEARING CAPACITY FAILURE. SEE |
| | PAGE 4 OF SOIL TEST REPORT. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO |
| | REVIEW SOIL TEST REPORT AND ACKNOWLEDGE IF GEOTECHNICAL |
| | ENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT OR NOT. REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL SECTION ON SHEET 9 OF 12. |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY SIZE AND SPACING OF ATTIC VENT. |
| | SEC. R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R703.1.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 7- ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SCHEDULE ON SHEET 10 OF 12: |
| | A)CLARIFY WHY THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ZONE 2E AND 3E |
| | ARE LOWER THAN THAN THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ZONE 2R? |
| | SEC. 301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B)ACCORDING TO TABLE R301.2(2) FBC-RESIDENTIAL THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ZONES 2E, 2R AND 3 ARE THE SAME. |
| | CLARIFY WHY SHOWING DIFFERENT DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | THESE ZONES. |
| | |
| | C)REVISE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS BASED |
| | ON REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES ON ITEM #7(B) ABOVE. SEC. |
| | 301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | D)ACCORDING TO FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL, THERE |
| | IS NOT ZONE #3E ON HIP ROOFS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | E)REVISE EDGE DIMENSION. ACCORDING TO FIGURE R301.2(7) |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, THE MIN. EDGE DIMENSION "A" IS 4'-0" |
| | NOT 3'-0". SEE FOOTNOTE "A" ON FIGURE R301.2(7) AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8-STAIR DETAILS ON SHEET 10 OF 12: |
| | A)TREAD DIMENSION CAN NOT BE LESS THAN 10". SEE SEC. |
| | R311.7.5.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: REVISE FLOOR PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | B)RISER HEIGHT IS NOT CLEAR. STAIR DETAIL SAYS 7-3/4" |
| | RISER TYP. , WHILE NOTE ADJACENT TO THE STAIR DETAIL |
| | SAYS STAIR RISER=7.65. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | ALSO, NUMBER OF RISER SPECIFIED NEXT TO THE STAIR |
| | DETAIL (18) DOESN'T MATCH NUMBER OF RISERS SHOWN ON |
| | FLOOR PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9-DOOR/WINDOW BUCK DETAIL ON SHEET 10 OF 12 SPECIFIES |
| | 2"X4" BUCK FOR DOORS. REVISE THE SIZE OF THE STRUCTURAL |
| | BUCK. STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | THE DOOR FRAME AND NEED TO EXTEND BEYOND THE INTERIOR |
| | FACE OF THE WINDOW OR DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. 2X4 BUCK IS SMALLER THAN |
| | THE DOOR FRAME. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: BEVELED BUCKS ARE NOT ALLOWED EITHER. |
| | |
| | 10- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER'S AND BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B)PROVIDE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR ITEM #2. THE QUESTION |
| | ON THIS ITEM IS SINGLE FAMILY OR MULTIPLE FAMILY?. |
| | "DETACHED IS NOT THE ANSWER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C)ROOF TYPE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 5 IS INCORRECT. |
| | THERE IS NOT GABLE OR SHED ROOF. SEE PLANS AND REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 5. |
| | TYPICALLY, THE RATIO IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | E)REVISE DOOR INFORMATION PAGE 3 OF 5. ONLY THE SIDE |
| | DOOR IS INSULATED. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVAL AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | NOTE: GLAZING IN ENTRY DOOR NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | WINDOW GLAZING AREA. SEE SEC. R405.5.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION) |
| | |
| | F) BUILDER TO SIGN AND COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
| | LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 11-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)ENTRY DOOR WITH SIDELITES THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. AND |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE. |
| | |
| | B)SLIDING GLASS DOORS. PROVIDE COMPLETE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | PAGE. |
| | |
| | C) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. PROVIDE COMPLETE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | PAGE. |
| | |
| | D)METAL ROOF. AND, CLEARLY SPECIFY FASTENING METHOD. |
| | |
| | E)WINDOW MULLIONS (NOTE: NEED TO SPECIFY MULLION SIZE |
| | TO AVOID DELAYS/CONFLICTS). |
| | |
| | F)ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS FOR METAL |
| | ROOFING. |
| | |
| | G)ALUMINUM SOFFIT AND ROOF VENTS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | H)HURRICANE SHUTTERS IF DOORS AND WINDOWS DON'T HAVE |
| | IMPACT GLAZING. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE CITY SAMPLE. |
| | |
| | 12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
