| Date |
Text |
| 2021-09-23 11:13:01 | REBUILD DUPLEX (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21071231 |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- PERMIT APPLICATION STATES: "REMODEL TWO STORY |
| | BUILDING AS PER PLANS". PLANS SUBMITTED ARE FOR |
| | COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY DUPLEX. NEED TO |
| | REVISE THE SCOPE OF WORK ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION TO |
| | SAY CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TWO STORY DUPLEX. |
| | THE PERMIT TYPE WILL BE CHANGED FROM RESIDENTIAL |
| | REMODEL TO NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | BASED ON REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED, THE SCOPE OF WORK IS |
| | TO REBUILT THE TWO STORY DUPLEX. PERMIT TYPE WAS |
| | CHANGED TO BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL PERMIT. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- BASED ON ITEM #1 ABOVE. VALUATION DECLARED IN THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL |
| | LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $182843.00. OWES $2250.65. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | FEES NEED TO BE PAID WHEN PERMIT IS APPROVED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- NEED TO APPLY FOR A SEPARATE BUILDING DEMOLITION |
| | PERMIT IN ORDER TO DEMOLISH OLD BUILDING. SEC. 105.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | WILL NEED DEMOLITION PERMIT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- NEED TO SPECIFY A LISTED FIRE RATED CEILING /FLOOR |
| | ASSEMBLY TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E119 OR UL263 |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R302.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | 1 HOUR FIRE RATED FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY DETAIL SHOWN |
| | ON SHEET 2-4 IS INCORRECT. UL DESIGN U465 IS FOR WALL |
| | ASSEMBLIES NOT FOR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. NEED TO SPECIFY AN APPROVED FLOOR /CEILING |
| | ASSEMBLY. |
| | ALSO, INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE 1 HOUR FIRE RATED |
| | FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY DETAIL DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SAME SHEET 2-4. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED AND COORDINATE ACCORDINGLY WITH |
| | CORRECT FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY DETAIL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- NEED TO PROVIDE FIRE RATED PENETRATIONS DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FIRE RATED FLOOR CEILING |
| | ASSEMBLY AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R302.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES "INFORMATION HAS BENN |
| | UPDATED ON SHEET 2-4". INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 6- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- LOT DRAINAGE |
| | PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES "THIS IS A REMODEL |
| | PROJECT". THIS IS INCORRECT. BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED |
| | SOIL IS ALTERED FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE |
| | REQUIRED DRAINAGE PLAN. |
| | NOTE: NORTH SIDE OF RECONSTRUCTED BUILDING IS TOO CLOSE |
| | TO THE THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. TAKE THIS INTO |
| | CONSIDERATION WHEN DOING THE DRAINAGE PLAN. WATER CAN |
| | NOT BE DIVERTED TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | 8- ACCORDING TO SURVEY SUBMITTED THE NORTH WALL OF |
| | BUILDING IS LOCATED LESS THAN 3 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE. THE FOLLOWING FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION IS |
| | REQUIRED: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) PROJECTIONS: NEED TO SPECIFY 1 HOUR FIRE RATED |
| | ASSEMBLY ON THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF PROJECTION. TABLE |
| | R302.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION OPENINGS FOR ATTIC |
| | VENTILATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THERE IS NO DETAIL FOR 1 HOUR FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY ON |
| | THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF PROJECTION. |
| | ALSO, THERE IS NO INFORMATION ABOUT THE ATTIC VENTS ON |
| | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET 2-4 SPECIFIES VENTS @ |
| | 8'-0" O.C. VENTS ARE NOT ALLOWED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF |
| | THE BUILDING. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SHOW ON THE ROOF |
| | PLAN HOW PROVIDING THE CROSS VENTILATION AT THE 1/150 |
| | RATIO AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806.1 AND SEC. R806.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED |
| | NUMBER OF VENTS. |
| | |
| | B)OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)PROVIDE FIRE RATED DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY WALL |
| | PENETRATIONS. TABLE R302.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SEE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR |
| | WALL PENETRATIONS. |
| | |
| | 9- STAIRWAY CONSTRUCTION: |
| | A) |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)PROVIDE NOSING DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R311.7.5.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | STAIR DETAIL ON SHEET 3-4 SHOWS 1/2" NOSING PROJECTION. |
| | NEED A NOSING PROJECTION NOT LESS THAN 3/4". REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: STAIR DETAIL SHOWS MARBLE TREADS AND RISERS. |
| | THESE ARE EXTERIOR STAIRS. THERE IS A CONCERN ABOUT |
| | THESE STAIRS BEING TOO SLIPPERY WHEN WET. PROVIDE |
| | DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW TO AVOID SLIPPERY |
| | TREADS. SEC. 101.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) OK. |
| | D) OK. |
| | |
| | E) AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED NEED TO SUBMIT HANDRAIL |
| | AND GUARDRAIL SHOP DRAWINGS APPROVED BY ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD AS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 10- OK |
| | 11- OK. |
| | 12-OK. |
| | 13-OK |
| | |
| | 14- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM. CORRECT ADDRESS IS 929 SELKIRK ST. NOT 923. |
| | PROVIDE OWNER AND BUILDER INFORMATION. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DOWNSTAIR & UPSTAIR UNITS ASSIGNED ADDRESS ARE OK ON |
| | EACH ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. REQUESTED OWNER AND |
| | BUILDER INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | THIS INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | C)OK. |
| | D) OK |
| | E) OK |
| | F) OK |
| | G) OK |
| | H) OK |
| | I) OK |
| | J)OK |
| | K)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | L)PROVIDE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR "WINDOWS" INFORMATION |
| | ON PAGE 3. THERE ARE TWO UNITS. WINDOW OVERHEAD |
| | SEPARATION VARIES FROM FIRST FLOOR UNIT TO SECOND FLOOR |
| | UNIT. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | WINDOW OVERHEAD SEPARATION FOR DOWNSTAIR UNIT (927 |
| | SELKIRK ST) IS INCORRECT. SEE BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
